Anthony Grafton is Henry Putnam University Professor of History at Princeton University, and one of the most distinguished and influential cultural historians writing today. His many previous publications include The Footnote (Harvard University Press, 1997), Leon Battista Alberti (Harvard University Press and Penguin, 2000), and Christianity and the Transformation of the Book (Harvard University Press, 2006).
[Product Description]
From the late-fifteenth century onwards, scholars across Europe began to write books about how to read and evaluate histories. These pioneering works - which often take surprisingly modern-sounding positions - grew from complex early modern debates about law, religion, and classical scholarship. In this book, based on the Trevelyan Lectures of 2005, Anthony Grafton explains why so many of these works were written, why they attained so much insight - and why, in the centuries that followed, most scholars gradually forgot that they had existed. Elegant and accessible, What Was History? is a deliberate evocation of E. H. Carr's celebrated and icononclastic Trevelyan Lectures on What Is History?, and will appeal to a broad readership of students, scholars and historical enthusiasts. Anthony Grafton is one of the most celebrated historians writing in English today, and What Was History? is a powerful and imaginative exploration of some central themes in the history of European ideas.
[Book Description]
One of the world's leading cultural historians explores the numerous treatises on how to read and write history that appeared throughout early modern Europe. What Was History? is based on the Trevelyan Lectures of 2005, and is a deliberate evocation of E. H. Carr's celebrated Trevelyan Lectures on What Is History?
發表於2024-12-20
What was History? 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: 曆史學 EarlyModernEurope 推薦 史學理論&史學史 史學史 曆史學與曆史哲學 曆史 history
magistra historia vitae; “ars historica” / “ars critica”; why was “ars historica” tradition forgotten in the 18th c.?
評分magistra historia vitae; “ars historica” / “ars critica”; why was “ars historica” tradition forgotten in the 18th c.?
評分Different approaches to history itself. Nice annotation. Meh.
評分Different approaches to history itself. Nice annotation. Meh.
評分Different approaches to history itself. Nice annotation. Meh.
What was History? 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載