发表于2024-11-05
Takings 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
For many of the American founding generation, originalism is an odd idea. Thomas Paine wrote in 1791 that “[t]he vanity and presumption of governing beyond the grave is the most ridiculous and insolent of all tyrannies.” For Paine every age and generatio...
评分For many of the American founding generation, originalism is an odd idea. Thomas Paine wrote in 1791 that “[t]he vanity and presumption of governing beyond the grave is the most ridiculous and insolent of all tyrannies.” For Paine every age and generatio...
评分For many of the American founding generation, originalism is an odd idea. Thomas Paine wrote in 1791 that “[t]he vanity and presumption of governing beyond the grave is the most ridiculous and insolent of all tyrannies.” For Paine every age and generatio...
评分For many of the American founding generation, originalism is an odd idea. Thomas Paine wrote in 1791 that “[t]he vanity and presumption of governing beyond the grave is the most ridiculous and insolent of all tyrannies.” For Paine every age and generatio...
评分For many of the American founding generation, originalism is an odd idea. Thomas Paine wrote in 1791 that “[t]he vanity and presumption of governing beyond the grave is the most ridiculous and insolent of all tyrannies.” For Paine every age and generatio...
图书标签: 薛兆丰 自由主义 法经济学 法学 richard legal epstein R.Epstein
If legal scholar Richard Epstein is right, then the New Deal is wrong, if not unconstitutional. Epstein reaches this sweeping conclusion after making a detailed analysis of the eminent domain, or takings, clause of the Constitution, which states that private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation. In contrast to the other guarantees in the Bill of Rights, the eminent domain clause has been interpreted narrowly. It has been invoked to force the government to compensate a citizen when his land is taken to build a post office, but not when its value is diminished by a comprehensive zoning ordinance. Epstein argues that this narrow interpretation is inconsistent with the language of the takings clause and the political theory that animates it. He develops a coherent normative theory that permits us to distinguish between permissible takings for public use and impermissible ones. He then examines a wide range of government regulations and taxes under a single comprehensive theory. He asks four questions: What constitutes a taking of private property? When is that taking justified without compensation under the police power? When is a taking for public use? And when is a taking compensated, in cash or in kind? Zoning, rent control, progressive and special taxes, workers' compensation, and bankruptcy are only a few of the programs analyzed within this framework. Epstein's theory casts doubt upon the established view today that the redistribution of wealth is a proper function of government. Throughout the book he uses recent developments in law and economics and the theory of collective choice to find in the eminent domain clause a theory of political obligation that he claims is superior to any of its modern rivals.
最低程度的Takings(包括decrease in value without physical intrusion)都应该全额补偿。否则就是偷就是抢。也不符合国家成立时保障个人自然权利的初衷。这一年已经被libertarianism彻底洗脑了。Epstein可以一小时不间断地高速讲话,都不带喘气的,且句式繁复,与他书的写作风格倒是一致。
评分最低程度的Takings(包括decrease in value without physical intrusion)都应该全额补偿。否则就是偷就是抢。也不符合国家成立时保障个人自然权利的初衷。这一年已经被libertarianism彻底洗脑了。Epstein可以一小时不间断地高速讲话,都不带喘气的,且句式繁复,与他书的写作风格倒是一致。
评分最低程度的Takings(包括decrease in value without physical intrusion)都应该全额补偿。否则就是偷就是抢。也不符合国家成立时保障个人自然权利的初衷。这一年已经被libertarianism彻底洗脑了。Epstein可以一小时不间断地高速讲话,都不带喘气的,且句式繁复,与他书的写作风格倒是一致。
评分最低程度的Takings(包括decrease in value without physical intrusion)都应该全额补偿。否则就是偷就是抢。也不符合国家成立时保障个人自然权利的初衷。这一年已经被libertarianism彻底洗脑了。Epstein可以一小时不间断地高速讲话,都不带喘气的,且句式繁复,与他书的写作风格倒是一致。
评分最低程度的Takings(包括decrease in value without physical intrusion)都应该全额补偿。否则就是偷就是抢。也不符合国家成立时保障个人自然权利的初衷。这一年已经被libertarianism彻底洗脑了。Epstein可以一小时不间断地高速讲话,都不带喘气的,且句式繁复,与他书的写作风格倒是一致。
Takings 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书