Between State and Market

出版者:Brill Academic Pub

作者:Jane DeBevoise

页数:312

出版时间:2014-6-30

价格:USD 133.00

装帧:Hardcover

isbn号码:9789004268012

图书标签:艺术史文化研究中国艺术史藝術市場社会史藝術史英文版英文原版

Between State and Market: Chinese Contemporary Art in the Post-Mao Era examines the shift in the system of support for contemporary art in China between 1979 and 1993, from state patronage to the introduction of the market, and the hybrid space that developed in between. Today, soaring prices for contemporary art have triggered a debate about the deleterious effect of the market on art. Yet Jane DeBevoise argues that, in the post-Mao period, the imaginary of the marketplace was liberating, offering artists an alternative framework of legitimacy and support. Based on primary research, DeBevoise explores the entangled role of the state and the market, and how experimental artists and their champions in China negotiated to find a creative space between the two systems to produce and promote their work.

读后感

DeBevoise’ research departs from Andrews (1994, 2012) and Krauss’s (1991, 2004) analysis of the relationship between politics and cultural production in China during 1970s-1980s, and seeks to provide a socio-economic context to the nascent, rapidly evolvi...

DeBevoise’ research departs from Andrews (1994, 2012) and Krauss’s (1991, 2004) analysis of the relationship between politics and cultural production in China during 1970s-1980s, and seeks to provide a socio-economic context to the nascent, rapidly evolvi...  

DeBevoise’ research departs from Andrews (1994, 2012) and Krauss’s (1991, 2004) analysis of the relationship between politics and cultural production in China during 1970s-1980s, and seeks to provide a socio-economic context to the nascent, rapidly evolvi...  

DeBevoise’ research departs from Andrews (1994, 2012) and Krauss’s (1991, 2004) analysis of the relationship between politics and cultural production in China during 1970s-1980s, and seeks to provide a socio-economic context to the nascent, rapidly evolvi...  

DeBevoise’ research departs from Andrews (1994, 2012) and Krauss’s (1991, 2004) analysis of the relationship between politics and cultural production in China during 1970s-1980s, and seeks to provide a socio-economic context to the nascent, rapidly evolvi...

用户评价

用經濟發展史的編年體寫法寫藝術史還蠻有趣的。但因為想要糾正藝術史主要以紀傳體的敘述構架而不太容易跟其他學科對接的問題，硬要按時間順序展開，反而削弱了對藝術風格演進脈絡的梳理。

用經濟發展史的編年體寫法寫藝術史還蠻有趣的。但因為想要糾正藝術史主要以紀傳體的敘述構架而不太容易跟其他學科對接的問題，硬要按時間順序展開，反而削弱了對藝術風格演進脈絡的梳理。

用經濟發展史的編年體寫法寫藝術史還蠻有趣的。但因為想要糾正藝術史主要以紀傳體的敘述構架而不太容易跟其他學科對接的問題，硬要按時間順序展開，反而削弱了對藝術風格演進脈絡的梳理。

用經濟發展史的編年體寫法寫藝術史還蠻有趣的。但因為想要糾正藝術史主要以紀傳體的敘述構架而不太容易跟其他學科對接的問題，硬要按時間順序展開，反而削弱了對藝術風格演進脈絡的梳理。

用經濟發展史的編年體寫法寫藝術史還蠻有趣的。但因為想要糾正藝術史主要以紀傳體的敘述構架而不太容易跟其他學科對接的問題，硬要按時間順序展開，反而削弱了對藝術風格演進脈絡的梳理。