Hubert Damisch teaches at the Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris. Among his books published in English are Skyline: The Narcissistic City (Stanford, 2001) and A Childhood Memory by Piero della Francesca (Stanford, 2001).
发表于2024-11-21
A Theory of /Cloud/ 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
图书标签: 艺术 艺术史 art 藝術史 绘画 透视法 艺术设计 视觉转向
This is the first in a series of books in which one of the most influential of contemporary art theorists revised from within the conceptions underlying the history of art. The author's basic idea is that the rigor of linear perspective cannot encompass all of visual experience and that it could be said to generate an oppositional factor with which it interacts dialectically: the cloud. On a literal level, this could be represented by the absence of the sky, as in Brunelleschi's legendary first experiments with panels using perspective. Or it could be the vaporous swathes that Correggio uses to mediate between the viewer on earth and the heavenly prospect in his frescoed domes at Parma. Insofar as the cloud is a semiotic operator, interacting with the linear order of perspective, it also becomes a dynamic agent facilitating the creation of new types of pictorial space. (Damisch puts the signifer cloud between slashes to indicate that he deals with clouds as signs instead of realistic elements.) This way of looking at the history of painting is especially fruitful for the Renaissance and Baroque periods, but it is also valuable for looking at such junctures as the nineteenth century. For example, Damisch invokes Ruskin and Turner, who carry out both in theory and in practice a revision of the conditions of appearances of the cloud as a landscape feature. Even for the twentieth century, he has illuminating things to say about how his reading of cloud applies to the painters Leger and Batthus. In short, Damisch achieves a brilliant and systematic demonstration of a concept of semiotic interaction that touches some of the most crucial features of the Western art tradition.
最後居然是一個馬克思主義的結尾, 只能說totally did not see that coming。本來已經想好了評語: The Cloud Sermon,雲的佈道。討論繪畫的物質性沒有問題,但如果是這樣,用如此長的篇幅剖析文藝復興繪畫中的象徵關係,而幾乎完全忽略繪畫的材料和技法,以及它們的意義是否於結論有點偏離?「芥子園畫論」應該不算繪畫理論,而是技法教學吧。相較之下討論中國山水畫的時候很大的篇幅都在談技法材料而非意義。可能是能獲取的資料有限的緣故。然而這個限制卻符合了Damisch的結論。讀完了我還是很不清楚Damisch的結論和Greenberg看起來如初一轍啊。但是Greenberg的論證方法偏重物質性並強調審美的感覺而非形式的意義。另外引用中國畫論小錯誤很多。
评分尽量不要看中译版本
评分本书始于一个看似微小的绘画现象,就是文艺复兴时期当画家们已经熟悉了一点透视之后开始如何画云。然而,事情远比想象的要复杂的多了。因为,云彩属于天空,它也属于那个基督教所相信的天堂。那么,一点透视是用来统一城市、街道、建筑的。可以用一点透视去统一土地和云彩上的天堂吗?还有,中世纪的宇宙观,基本上是亚里士多德的封闭宇宙。现在,宇宙是不是开放的呀?围绕着透视,尤其是云彩最初画着了帕尔玛教堂上的天庭上,欧洲人展开了一场关于绘画到底画什么、怎样画的讨论。出人意料的是,本书结尾的第5章,把画论的问题引向了中国。显然,以
评分尽量不要看中译版本
评分很早之前读的 山水那章
A Theory of /Cloud/ 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书