Hubert Damisch teaches at the Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris. Among his books published in English are Skyline: The Narcissistic City (Stanford, 2001) and A Childhood Memory by Piero della Francesca (Stanford, 2001).
This is the first in a series of books in which one of the most influential of contemporary art theorists revised from within the conceptions underlying the history of art. The author's basic idea is that the rigor of linear perspective cannot encompass all of visual experience and that it could be said to generate an oppositional factor with which it interacts dialectically: the cloud. On a literal level, this could be represented by the absence of the sky, as in Brunelleschi's legendary first experiments with panels using perspective. Or it could be the vaporous swathes that Correggio uses to mediate between the viewer on earth and the heavenly prospect in his frescoed domes at Parma. Insofar as the cloud is a semiotic operator, interacting with the linear order of perspective, it also becomes a dynamic agent facilitating the creation of new types of pictorial space. (Damisch puts the signifer cloud between slashes to indicate that he deals with clouds as signs instead of realistic elements.) This way of looking at the history of painting is especially fruitful for the Renaissance and Baroque periods, but it is also valuable for looking at such junctures as the nineteenth century. For example, Damisch invokes Ruskin and Turner, who carry out both in theory and in practice a revision of the conditions of appearances of the cloud as a landscape feature. Even for the twentieth century, he has illuminating things to say about how his reading of cloud applies to the painters Leger and Batthus. In short, Damisch achieves a brilliant and systematic demonstration of a concept of semiotic interaction that touches some of the most crucial features of the Western art tradition.
發表於2025-01-31
A Theory of /Cloud/ 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: 藝術 藝術史 art 藝術史 繪畫 透視法 藝術設計 視覺轉嚮
舊瞭
評分本書始於一個看似微小的繪畫現象,就是文藝復興時期當畫傢們已經熟悉瞭一點透視之後開始如何畫雲。然而,事情遠比想象的要復雜的多瞭。因為,雲彩屬於天空,它也屬於那個基督教所相信的天堂。那麼,一點透視是用來統一城市、街道、建築的。可以用一點透視去統一土地和雲彩上的天堂嗎?還有,中世紀的宇宙觀,基本上是亞裏士多德的封閉宇宙。現在,宇宙是不是開放的呀?圍繞著透視,尤其是雲彩最初畫著瞭帕爾瑪教堂上的天庭上,歐洲人展開瞭一場關於繪畫到底畫什麼、怎樣畫的討論。齣人意料的是,本書結尾的第5章,把畫論的問題引嚮瞭中國。顯然,以
評分這本書說實話其實是關於描述透視發展過程中麵對的一個缺陷,無法呈現天空及雲彩,於是在繪畫中“雲”這個主體究竟處於怎樣的地位,是作為消解空間深度“depth”、還是能指無限"infinity"的工具;齣發點一直是透視,而不是題目錶麵所說的“雲”。語言十分晦澀,與哲學發展密切結閤起來討論透視問題,這本身就需要大量基礎閱讀纔能讀進去。第五章其實比較脫離討論主體,中國繪畫對待“雲”的態度被單另齣來加以描述,相對透視論述來說比較粗淺泛泛。
評分How structuralism works in the art domain //能扯到DS+R的blur我還挺驚奇的// 瞭解瞭theoretical object和real object, object和thing之間的重要差彆// 解釋中國繪畫和建築的時候總覺得片麵 因為著重研究瞭技法體現的結構主義哲學思想 而忽略瞭中國繪畫迭代的曆史 // 記錄Michael的一句話: he’s looking into A theory of painting but not THE theory of painting // Ruo的material historical diagram超級有用!一下子理解瞭如此分析的哲學價值意義及其局限性 也完全解釋瞭倪在春節的時候對我進行的靈魂拷問
評分盡量不要看中譯版本
A Theory of /Cloud/ 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載