Socialist Cosmopolitanism

Nicolai Volland is assistant professor of Chinese and comparative literature at the Pennsylvania State University.

出版者:Columbia University Press

作者:Nicolai Volland

页数:304

出版时间:2017-3-28

价格:USD 60.00

装帧:Hardcover

isbn号码:9780231183109

图书标签:比较文学海外中国研究PRC文化研究历史中苏中国文学新书记

承接 住宅 自建房 室内改造 装修设计 免费咨询 QQ：624617358 一级注册建筑师 亲自为您回答、经验丰富，价格亲民。无论项目大小，都全力服务。期待合作，欢迎咨询！QQ：624617358

Socialist Cosmopolitanism offers an innovative interpretation of literature from the Mao era, proposing to read Chinese socialist literature as world literature. China after 1949 engaged with the world beyond its borders in myriad ways and on many levels—political and economic, cultural as well as literary. Far from rejecting the worldliness of earlier eras, Nicolai Volland demonstrates, the young People's Republic developed its own cosmopolitanism. Rather than a radical break with the past, Chinese socialist literature should be seen as an integral and important chapter of China's long search to find a place within world literature. Socialist Cosmopolitanism revisits a range of genres, from poetry and land reform novels to science fiction and children's literature, and shows how Chinese writers and readers alike saw their own literary production as part of a much larger literary universe. This literary space, reaching from Beijing to Berlin, from Prague to Pyongyang, from Warsaw to Moscow to Hanoi, allowed authors and texts to travel, in the course reinventing the meaning of world literature. Chinese socialist literature is driven by a hugely ambitious—and ultimately doomed—attempt to redraw the literary world map.

用户评价

才华横溢

这书一上市我就买来看，五十多刀呀，没想到这么快就出pdf了

才华横溢

這是一個「英特納雄耐爾還是柯夢波丹」的問題。導論對世界文學的介入非常好。晚近北美世界文學論的問題就是把「世界」形容成一個貨暢其流的網絡，只不過有華勒斯坦式的「中心－邊陲」之分。本書提醒我們在冷戰期間「世界」曾經一分為二，兩陣營各自建構自己的文學世界觀，兩者卻又都認為自己的那套是唯一的世界觀，於是形成了一種既單一又二元的悖反。不過既然當時社會主義陣營通用的用語是「國際主義」，為什麼本書採用「世界主義」？用語的選擇本身也是一種後冷戰的癥候。書中對兒童文學的討論可以看成晚近對普羅文學新的關注方向，Samuel Perry 的 Recasting Red Culture in Proletarian Japan 也有專章討論。

标准的博士论文写法，序言部分关于世界主义，国际主义，社会主义世界主义几个线索梳理得较清楚，之后就是标准的文学史，冯至，王蒙……除了理论路径，似乎也没有特别多的新……事实上socialist coms包含的面向更丰富，第三世界在其中又在其外，中国是要做第五罗马的。本书鲜有涉及，甚至都没有一次提到“第三世界”、“亚非拉”这些关键词，可能还是资料和视野的问题。