Genevieve Lloyd is at the University of New South Wales.
In this lucid and elegantly written book, Genevieve Lloyd reads Spinoza's philosophy as a profound articulation of ideas of individuality, selfhood, and freedom. Focusing on Spinoza's Ethics, Lloyd illuminates as well his transformation of Descartes's concepts of substance, mind, and body, and the relations between Spinoza's metaphysics and his ethical views. Spinoza's doctrine of the uniqueness of substance has been interpreted as absorbing individual self-consciousness into an all-embracing whole. Here, Lloyd addresses the dilemmas posed by the Cartesian legacy of what it means to be a self: the sense of isolation of a contained intellectual substance trying to establish contact with an "external" world, the limitations of an idea of knowledge that sharply distinguishes between reason and the passions, problems in thinking about time and mortality in ways that allow no middle ground between an afterlife and annihilation, and tensions in ideals of personhood that claim to transcend sexual difference. Throughout, Lloyd emphasizes the ethical importance of Spinoza's metaphysics. Out of his treatment of substance and its modes emerge new ways of thinking about self-consciousness, freedom, gender difference, the passions, and time. As the influence of Descartes wanes, Lloyd suggests that Spinoza's philosophy may help us rethink some of the most troubling issues surrounding our understanding of the self.
發表於2024-11-23
Part of Nature 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: Spinoza 哲學注疏
比較有意思的對斯賓諾莎《倫理學》的主題式梳理,核心在於指齣斯賓諾莎與笛卡爾主義的背離之處:在笛卡爾看來,人在自然之外,因而能夠自由地、依於意誌地在種種可能性中作齣選擇;而對斯賓諾莎而言,人是自然的一部分,與自然服從相同的必然規律,其自由恰在於從統治自然和自我的可悲幻想中解放齣來。
評分比較有意思的對斯賓諾莎《倫理學》的主題式梳理,核心在於指齣斯賓諾莎與笛卡爾主義的背離之處:在笛卡爾看來,人在自然之外,因而能夠自由地、依於意誌地在種種可能性中作齣選擇;而對斯賓諾莎而言,人是自然的一部分,與自然服從相同的必然規律,其自由恰在於從統治自然和自我的可悲幻想中解放齣來。
評分比較有意思的對斯賓諾莎《倫理學》的主題式梳理,核心在於指齣斯賓諾莎與笛卡爾主義的背離之處:在笛卡爾看來,人在自然之外,因而能夠自由地、依於意誌地在種種可能性中作齣選擇;而對斯賓諾莎而言,人是自然的一部分,與自然服從相同的必然規律,其自由恰在於從統治自然和自我的可悲幻想中解放齣來。
評分比較有意思的對斯賓諾莎《倫理學》的主題式梳理,核心在於指齣斯賓諾莎與笛卡爾主義的背離之處:在笛卡爾看來,人在自然之外,因而能夠自由地、依於意誌地在種種可能性中作齣選擇;而對斯賓諾莎而言,人是自然的一部分,與自然服從相同的必然規律,其自由恰在於從統治自然和自我的可悲幻想中解放齣來。
評分比較有意思的對斯賓諾莎《倫理學》的主題式梳理,核心在於指齣斯賓諾莎與笛卡爾主義的背離之處:在笛卡爾看來,人在自然之外,因而能夠自由地、依於意誌地在種種可能性中作齣選擇;而對斯賓諾莎而言,人是自然的一部分,與自然服從相同的必然規律,其自由恰在於從統治自然和自我的可悲幻想中解放齣來。
Part of Nature 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載