Anthea Roberts is Associate Professor in the School of Regulation and Global Governance (RegNet) at the Australian National University. She specializes in public international law, investment treaty law and arbitration, and comparative international law. Anthea previously taught at the London School of Economics as well as Columbia and Harvard Law Schools. She is on the Editorial Boards of the American Journal of International Law, ICSID Review, and the Journal of World Investment and Trade, and blogs for EJIL: Talk! She has twice won the Francis Deák Prize for the best AJIL article by a younger scholar. Anthea serves as a Reporter for the Restatement (Fourth) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States, and has experience serving as an arbitrator, counsel, and expert in international disputes.
This book takes the reader on a sweeping tour of the international legal field to reveal some of the patterns of difference, dominance, and disruption that belie international lawâs claim to universality.
Pulling back the curtain on the âdivisible college of international lawyers,â Anthea Roberts shows how international lawyers in different states, regions, and geopolitical groupings are often subject to distinct incoming influences and outgoing spheres of influence in ways that reflect and reinforce differences in how they understand and approach international law. These divisions manifest themselves in contemporary controversies, such as debates about Crimea and the South China Sea.
Not all approaches to international law are created equal, however. Using case studies and visual representations, the author demonstrates how actors and materials from some states and groups have come to dominate certain transnational flows and forums in ways that make them disproportionately influential in constructing the âinternational.â This point holds true for Western actors, materials, and approaches in general, and for Anglo-American (and sometimes French) ones in particular.
However, these patterns are set for disruption. As the world moves past an era of Western dominance and toward greater multipolarity, it is imperative for international lawyers to understand the perspectives and approaches of those coming from diverse backgrounds. By taking readers on a comparative tour of different international law academies and textbooks, the author encourages them to see the world through the eyes of others?an essential skill in this fast changing world of shifting power dynamics and rising nationalism.
發表於2024-12-23
Is International Law International? 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: 國際法 比較國際法 國際秩序 外國法 國內法 南海仲裁案 剋裏米亞
作者從比較國際法的視角,以“區彆(difference)” “主導(dominance)”、“攪局(disruption)”為主題,以五大常任理事國國內的國際法研究、教學與實踐為研究對象,揭開籠罩在普世性(universality)麵紗下各國國際法特徵機理,固有局限與競爭優勢
評分與其說是國際法作品不如說是國際法社會學作品。作者本著一顆極其謙虛謹慎中立客觀的學術心研究瞭五大國的國際法生態。雖有許多我等國際法邊緣國傢耳熟能詳的某些國傢的大國心態結論,但通過painful的數據收集整理後得到的結論能予人以不同觀感。尤其是給美國讀者吧。
評分Dumping data (without quantitative research though) to confirm something that everyone knew, and reinforcing an impression that damages the reputation of international law without bringing up alternatives.
評分Dumping data (without quantitative research though) to confirm something that everyone knew, and reinforcing an impression that damages the reputation of international law without bringing up alternatives.
評分與其說是國際法作品不如說是國際法社會學作品。作者本著一顆極其謙虛謹慎中立客觀的學術心研究瞭五大國的國際法生態。雖有許多我等國際法邊緣國傢耳熟能詳的某些國傢的大國心態結論,但通過painful的數據收集整理後得到的結論能予人以不同觀感。尤其是給美國讀者吧。
Is International Law International? 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載