Hegel's Elements of the Philosophy of Right

出版者:Cambridge University Press

作者:David James

页数:252

出版时间:2017-2-23

价格:USD 99.99

装帧:Hardcover

isbn号码:9781107077928

具体描述

Hegel's Elements of the Philosophy of Right, one of the classic texts of German Idealism, is a seminal work of legal, social and political philosophy that has generated very different interpretations since its publication in 1821. Written with the advantage of historical distance, the essays in this volume adopt a fresh perspective that makes readers aware of the breadth and depth of this classic work. The themes of the essays reflect the continuing relevance of the text, and include Hegel's method, the concept of property, Hegel's view of morality, the concept of Sittlichkeit, the modern family, the nature and tensions of civil society, and the question of the modernity of the Hegelian state. The volume will be of interest to all scholars and students of German Idealism and the history of political thought.

作者简介

David James is Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of Warwick. His publications include Fichte's Republic: Idealism, History and Nationalism (Cambridge, 2015), Rousseau and German Idealism: Freedom, Dependence and Necessity (Cambridge, 2013), and Fichte's Social and Political Philosophy: Property and Virtue (Cambridge, 2011). He is co-editor of The Cambridge Companion to Fichte (with Günter Zöller, Cambridge, 2016).

目录信息

The Method of the Philosophy of Right
16
Property Use and Value in Hegels Philosophy of Right
37
Hegel on Morality
58
Hegelian Conscience as Reflective Equilibrium and
77
Wives Husbands and Children
97
Bifurcation Bildung
116
Rights Markets and States
137
Hegel Rabble and Consequences
160
Practical Necessity and the Logic of Civil Society
177
How Modern is the Hegelian State?
197
Bibliography
219
Index
227
· · · · · · (收起)

用户评价

Warwick大学集体show，篇1与3颇见老一代前辈功力；篇目2洞见槽点一样多，草译一下开批，所谓逻辑必然性模糊不清；篇8谈“贱民”细微而深刻，但将穷人/贱民与马克思的工人阶级/无产阶级并列，还需深思；篇9编者讨论实践必然性，可与篇2参照，但恐怕还需与理性的狡计一起思考。

Warwick大学集体show，篇1与3颇见老一代前辈功力；篇目2洞见槽点一样多，草译一下开批，所谓逻辑必然性模糊不清；篇8谈“贱民”细微而深刻，但将穷人/贱民与马克思的工人阶级/无产阶级并列，还需深思；篇9编者讨论实践必然性，可与篇2参照，但恐怕还需与理性的狡计一起思考。

Warwick大学集体show，篇1与3颇见老一代前辈功力；篇目2洞见槽点一样多，草译一下开批，所谓逻辑必然性模糊不清；篇8谈“贱民”细微而深刻，但将穷人/贱民与马克思的工人阶级/无产阶级并列，还需深思；篇9编者讨论实践必然性，可与篇2参照，但恐怕还需与理性的狡计一起思考。

Warwick大学集体show，篇1与3颇见老一代前辈功力；篇目2洞见槽点一样多，草译一下开批，所谓逻辑必然性模糊不清；篇8谈“贱民”细微而深刻，但将穷人/贱民与马克思的工人阶级/无产阶级并列，还需深思；篇9编者讨论实践必然性，可与篇2参照，但恐怕还需与理性的狡计一起思考。

Warwick大学集体show，篇1与3颇见老一代前辈功力；篇目2洞见槽点一样多，草译一下开批，所谓逻辑必然性模糊不清；篇8谈“贱民”细微而深刻，但将穷人/贱民与马克思的工人阶级/无产阶级并列，还需深思；篇9编者讨论实践必然性，可与篇2参照，但恐怕还需与理性的狡计一起思考。