邁剋爾·紮剋特(Michael Zuckert,1942-),美國著名的政治理論傢,芝加哥大學哲學博士,聖母大學政治科學係講座教授,《美國政治思想》期刊創刊人,曾任教於康奈爾大學、明尼蘇達大學和密歇根大學。先後獲得美國自由製度研究協會(ASFI)奬(2010)、傑剋米勒中心(JMC)主席終身成就奬(2011),是洛剋政治思想、美國政治思想和憲法研究最為著名的學者之一。除瞭本書外,主要著名作還有《自然權利與新共和主義》(Natural Rights and the New Republicanism,1994)、《自然權利的共和國》(The Natural Rights Republic,1997)、《施特勞斯的真相:政治哲學與美國民主》(The Truth about Leo Strauss:Polittical Philosphy and American Democracy,2006)等。
In this volume, prominent political theorist Michael Zuckert presents an important and pathbreaking set of meditations on the thought of John Locke. In more than a dozen provocative essays, many appearing in print for the first time, Zuckert explores the complexity of Locke's engagement with his philosophical and theological predecessors, his profound influence on later liberal thinkers, and his amazing success in transforming the political understanding of the Anglo-American world. At the same time, he also demonstrates Locke's continuing relevance in current debates involving such prominent thinkers as Rawls and MacIntyre. Zuckert's careful reconsideration of Locke's role as "launcher" of liberalism involves a sustained engagement with the hermeneutical issues surrounding Locke, an innovator who faced special rhetorical needs in addressing his contemporaries and the future. It also involves highlighting the novelty of Locke's position by examining his stance toward the philosophical and religious traditions in place when he wrote. Zuckert argues that neither of the dominant ways of understanding Locke's relations to his predecessors and contemporaries is adequate; he is not well seen as a follower of any orthodoxy nor of any anti-orthodoxy of his day, either philosophical or theological. He found a path to innovation that was philosophically radical but which was also able to connect with prevailing and accepted traditions. This path allowed him to exercise a practical influence in history rarely, if ever, matched by any other philosopher. Zuckert illustrates that influence by showing how William Blackstone used Lockean philosophy to reshape the common law and how the Americans of the eighteenth century used Lockean philosophy to reshape Whig political thought. Zuckert argues that Locke's philosophy has continuing philosophic and political force, a proposition he demonstrates by arguing that Locke presents a form of political philosophy superior to that of the liberal theorists of our day and that he has solid rejoinders to contemporary critics of liberalism.
發表於2025-04-27
Launching Liberalism 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
中譯本第68頁第一次提到瞭帕多瓦的馬西裏烏斯及其權力分離學說假設,但並未給齣對應羅馬文原名。 第75頁再次提到馬西略(Marsilius),這次一句帶過卻給齣瞭長達五行的中譯注釋,搞得像是第一次碰到一樣,並且馬西裏烏斯已經變成瞭馬西略。 第81頁再次提...
評分[美]邁剋爾·紮剋特.洛剋政治哲學研究[M].石碧球 等譯.人民齣版社.2013 導論(洛剋與霍布斯) ·自然權利觀 霍布斯認為自由在於每個人對每種事物都擁有權利,甚至彼此的身體;所以不可能有財産這樣的排他性主張。而洛剋斷言每個人對其人格有一種所有權;權利並非純粹自由,而是...
評分[美]邁剋爾·紮剋特.洛剋政治哲學研究[M].石碧球 等譯.人民齣版社.2013 導論(洛剋與霍布斯) ·自然權利觀 霍布斯認為自由在於每個人對每種事物都擁有權利,甚至彼此的身體;所以不可能有財産這樣的排他性主張。而洛剋斷言每個人對其人格有一種所有權;權利並非純粹自由,而是...
評分[美]邁剋爾·紮剋特.洛剋政治哲學研究[M].石碧球 等譯.人民齣版社.2013 導論(洛剋與霍布斯) ·自然權利觀 霍布斯認為自由在於每個人對每種事物都擁有權利,甚至彼此的身體;所以不可能有財産這樣的排他性主張。而洛剋斷言每個人對其人格有一種所有權;權利並非純粹自由,而是...
評分中譯本第68頁第一次提到瞭帕多瓦的馬西裏烏斯及其權力分離學說假設,但並未給齣對應羅馬文原名。 第75頁再次提到馬西略(Marsilius),這次一句帶過卻給齣瞭長達五行的中譯注釋,搞得像是第一次碰到一樣,並且馬西裏烏斯已經變成瞭馬西略。 第81頁再次提...
圖書標籤: 自由主義 洛剋 霍布斯 施特勞斯
裏麵的文章因為各種機緣斷斷續續讀瞭好長時間
評分裏麵的文章因為各種機緣斷斷續續讀瞭好長時間
評分裏麵的文章因為各種機緣斷斷續續讀瞭好長時間
評分裏麵的文章因為各種機緣斷斷續續讀瞭好長時間
評分裏麵的文章因為各種機緣斷斷續續讀瞭好長時間
Launching Liberalism 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載