发表于2024-11-21
Action in Perception 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
图书标签: 心灵哲学 哲学 现象学 分析哲学 theory perception 艺术心理学 心智哲学
"Perception is not something that happens to us, or in us," writes Alva Noe. "It is something we do." In Action in Perception, Noe argues that perception and perceptual consciousness depend on capacities for action and thought -- that perception is a kind of thoughtful activity. Touch, not vision, should be our model for perception. Perception is not a process in the brain, but a kind of skillful activity of the body as a whole. We enact our perceptual experience.To perceive, according to this enactive approach to perception, is not merely to have sensations; it is to have sensations that we understand. In Action in Perception, Noe investigates the forms this understanding can take. He begins by arguing, on both phenomenological and empirical grounds, that the content of perception is not like the content of a picture; the world is not given to consciousness all at once but is gained gradually by active inquiry and exploration. Noe then argues that perceptual experience acquires content thanks to our possession and exercise of practical bodily knowledge, and examines, among other topics, the problems posed by spatial content and the experience of color. He considers the perspectival aspect of the representational content of experience and assesses the place of thought and understanding in experience. Finally, he explores the implications of the enactive approach for our understanding of the neuroscience of perception.
虽然长得像打手心思倒是很细腻,很多细节具有深刻反思性,并不做空洞地冒进,很好地结合了欧陆和英美并能在行文上保持清晰和准确,对不同理论的逐条反驳气势可谓排山倒海。不足是过于按照自己的论证顺序而忽视了成书后的分布顺序导致经常需要返回去看,结构性不够。几个分问题(空间、色彩、视角、知觉概念)都很精彩。但不得不说noe的知觉观有点过度实在论,因而他那里的身体和生物学意义的身体几乎没有区别 故否定存在personal和subpersonal这一区分 因而危险地忽视了人的第一视角锁定问题。最末的神经科学问题还得重看,还不是很明白
评分看出作者尤其喜欢维特根斯坦了
评分虽然长得像打手心思倒是很细腻,很多细节具有深刻反思性,并不做空洞地冒进,很好地结合了欧陆和英美并能在行文上保持清晰和准确,对不同理论的逐条反驳气势可谓排山倒海。不足是过于按照自己的论证顺序而忽视了成书后的分布顺序导致经常需要返回去看,结构性不够。几个分问题(空间、色彩、视角、知觉概念)都很精彩。但不得不说noe的知觉观有点过度实在论,因而他那里的身体和生物学意义的身体几乎没有区别 故否定存在personal和subpersonal这一区分 因而危险地忽视了人的第一视角锁定问题。最末的神经科学问题还得重看,还不是很明白
评分虽然长得像打手心思倒是很细腻,很多细节具有深刻反思性,并不做空洞地冒进,很好地结合了欧陆和英美并能在行文上保持清晰和准确,对不同理论的逐条反驳气势可谓排山倒海。不足是过于按照自己的论证顺序而忽视了成书后的分布顺序导致经常需要返回去看,结构性不够。几个分问题(空间、色彩、视角、知觉概念)都很精彩。但不得不说noe的知觉观有点过度实在论,因而他那里的身体和生物学意义的身体几乎没有区别 故否定存在personal和subpersonal这一区分 因而危险地忽视了人的第一视角锁定问题。最末的神经科学问题还得重看,还不是很明白
评分乏善可陈
Action in Perception 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书