Discipline & Punish

Michel Foucault acknowledged as the preeminent philosopher of France in the 1970s and 1980s, continues to have enormous impact throughout the world in many disciplines. He died in 1984.

出版者:T Vintage Books USA

作者:Michel Foucault

页数:333

译者:Alan Sheridan

出版时间:1979

价格:US$ 11.00

装帧:Paperback

isbn号码:9780394727677

图书标签:Foucault哲学Sociology福柯权力theoryPower理论基础

承接 住宅 自建房 室内改造 装修设计 免费咨询 QQ：624617358 一级注册建筑师 亲自为您回答、经验丰富，价格亲民。无论项目大小，都全力服务。期待合作，欢迎咨询！QQ：624617358

In this brilliant work, the most influential philosopher since Sartre suggests that such vaunted reforms as the abolition of torture and the emergence of the modern penitentiary have merely shifted the focus of punishment from the prisoner's body to his soul.

.

Annotation

Argues that prison as discipline has spread since the 17th century when torture of the body gave way to punishment of the soul through rehabilitation.

读后感

该书的副题是监狱的诞生，但是，本书的视野却不局限于监狱，而是以回溯的姿态考察了刑罚的系谱，我们顺着作者“考古”的足迹一路走来，中世纪末和“旧制度”时期作为王权武器的酷刑；古典时期人道主义改革者的梦想；体现现代规训权力技术的监狱和规范化监督。这一幕幕图景折射...  

鉴于福柯之危险性，本熊的文章纯属脑洞。 ------------------------- @杜冷丁 老弟回答得不错。他的思路是从福柯后期谈康德的那篇文本入手，这样做当然比我更有学术深度。熊阅后只能借鸡生蛋，对福柯思想做一个全面宽泛的推导式解读。 ------------------------- 在讨论福柯之...  

觉得福柯所有的论证就是为了说明全景敞视主义世界的到来，而世界确实如此。两个地方可以证明 一是监控摄像头；而是社交网络。 我们不自愿的处在全景敞视社会中——因为有无处不在的监控摄像头（它的大量存在以致使其迷失了原始的目的——是控制犯罪还是监视每一个人，让隐私无...  

用户评价

The panopticon architecture that exists and functions as the social credit system and the censorship system (in China) has surpass the its own architectural influence. It transformed into every day life so as to sustain the relationship between the power and discipline.

The panopticon architecture that exists and functions as the social credit system and the censorship system (in China) has surpass the its own architectural influence. It transformed into every day life so as to sustain the relationship between the power and discipline.

物化象征~统一人性

I only read the chapter "The means of correct training" . This is the second time I read it. Really great!

犹记得第一次读福柯，英文比现在还差，那种茫茫然看完之后一片空白的感觉至今挥之不去。如今重读福柯，兼读受他影响的其他人的作品，反复消化之后，总算对他和后结构主义有了清晰一些的认识。他的观点现在看来不过尔尔，不过当时应该的确是摧枯拉朽的。