Neil Brenner is Professor of Urban Theory at the Graduate School of Design at Harvard University. Brenner is among the most widely cited contemporary urban theorists. Previous books include New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood; Implosions/Explosions: Towards a Study of Planetary Urbanization (editor); and Critique of Urbanization. Brenner has made influential contributions to scholarly debates on critical urban theory, the critique of capitalist urbanization, urban restructuring, state space, the political economy of rescaling, variegated neoliberalization and planetary urbanization.
The urban condition is today being radically transformed. Urban restructuring is accelerating, new urban spaces are being consolidated, and new forms of urbanization are crystallizing. In New Urban Spaces, Neil Brenner argues that understanding these mutations of urban life requires not only concrete research, but new theories of urbanization. To this end, Brenner proposes an approach that breaks with inherited conceptions of the urban as a bounded settlement unit-the city or the metropolis-and explores the multiscalar constitution and periodic rescaling of the capitalist urban fabric. Drawing on critical geopolitical economy and spatialized approaches to state theory, Brenner offers a paradigmatic account of how rescaling processes are transforming inherited formations of urban space and their variegated consequences for emergent patterns and pathways of urbanization. The book also advances an understanding of critical urban theory as radically revisable: key urban concepts must be continually reinvented in relation to the relentlessly mutating worlds of urbanization they aspire to illuminate.
發表於2024-12-19
New Urban Spaces 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: 城市研究 urban theory 城市規劃 技術創新
Brenner很會寫,但真沒必要寫這麼冗雜。相關理論結閤John Agnew和Susan Strange的著作看更有意義,後兩者補充瞭被B忽視(或者說刻意弱化)的領域維度。另外許多人批評B的理論裏麵沒有行動者,這一點本人持保留意見,state在他的文本中其實是具有行動者和地理空間雙重含義的,隻可惜並沒有明確區分開
評分Brenner很會寫,但真沒必要寫這麼冗雜。相關理論結閤John Agnew和Susan Strange的著作看更有意義,後兩者補充瞭被B忽視(或者說刻意弱化)的領域維度。另外許多人批評B的理論裏麵沒有行動者,這一點本人持保留意見,state在他的文本中其實是具有行動者和地理空間雙重含義的,隻可惜並沒有明確區分開
評分Brenner很會寫,但真沒必要寫這麼冗雜。相關理論結閤John Agnew和Susan Strange的著作看更有意義,後兩者補充瞭被B忽視(或者說刻意弱化)的領域維度。另外許多人批評B的理論裏麵沒有行動者,這一點本人持保留意見,state在他的文本中其實是具有行動者和地理空間雙重含義的,隻可惜並沒有明確區分開
評分Brenner很會寫,但真沒必要寫這麼冗雜。相關理論結閤John Agnew和Susan Strange的著作看更有意義,後兩者補充瞭被B忽視(或者說刻意弱化)的領域維度。另外許多人批評B的理論裏麵沒有行動者,這一點本人持保留意見,state在他的文本中其實是具有行動者和地理空間雙重含義的,隻可惜並沒有明確區分開
評分Brenner很會寫,但真沒必要寫這麼冗雜。相關理論結閤John Agnew和Susan Strange的著作看更有意義,後兩者補充瞭被B忽視(或者說刻意弱化)的領域維度。另外許多人批評B的理論裏麵沒有行動者,這一點本人持保留意見,state在他的文本中其實是具有行動者和地理空間雙重含義的,隻可惜並沒有明確區分開
New Urban Spaces 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載