Jill Lepore is the David Woods Kemper ’41 Professor of American History at Harvard University and a staff writer at The New Yorker. Her many books include The Secret History of Wonder Woman, a national bestseller, and Book of Ages, a finalist for the National Book Award. She lives in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
From the acclaimed historian and New Yorker writer comes this urgent manifesto on the dilemma of nationalism and the erosion of liberalism in the twenty-first century.
At a time of much despair over the future of liberal democracy, Jill Lepore makes a stirring case for the nation in This America, a follow-up to her much-celebrated history of the United States, These Truths.
With dangerous forms of nationalism on the rise, Lepore, a Harvard historian and New Yorker staff writer, repudiates nationalism here by explaining its long history―and the history of the idea of the nation itself―while calling for a “new Americanism”: a generous patriotism that requires an honest reckoning with America’s past.
Lepore begins her argument with a primer on the origins of nations, explaining how liberalism, the nation-state, and liberal nationalism, developed together. Illiberal nationalism, however, emerged in the United States after the Civil War―resulting in the failure of Reconstruction, the rise of Jim Crow, and the restriction of immigration. Much of American history, Lepore argues, has been a battle between these two forms of nationalism, liberal and illiberal, all the way down to the nation’s latest, bitter struggles over immigration.
Defending liberalism, as This America demonstrates, requires making the case for the nation. But American historians largely abandoned that defense in the 1960s when they stopped writing national history. By the 1980s they’d stopped studying the nation-state altogether and embraced globalism instead. “When serious historians abandon the study of the nation,” Lepore tellingly writes, “nationalism doesn’t die. Instead, it eats liberalism.” But liberalism is still in there, Lepore affirms, and This America is an attempt to pull it out. “In a world made up of nations, there is no more powerful way to fight the forces of prejudice, intolerance, and injustice than by a dedication to equality, citizenship, and equal rights, as guaranteed by a nation of laws.”
A manifesto for a better nation, and a call for a “new Americanism,” This America reclaims the nation’s future by reclaiming its past.
發表於2024-12-23
This America 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
美國曆史研究,從開國至1960年代,專注於美國整個民族的發展。70年代之後,隨著民權運動的興起,加之婦女、少數族裔學者的産生,開始轉嚮小群體或世界大曆史的方嚮。隨著前蘇聯的解體,自由民主主義和普世價值在全球範圍的普及,讓曆史學傢們說齣瞭"曆史的終結"這種話,意思...
評分美國曆史研究,從開國至1960年代,專注於美國整個民族的發展。70年代之後,隨著民權運動的興起,加之婦女、少數族裔學者的産生,開始轉嚮小群體或世界大曆史的方嚮。隨著前蘇聯的解體,自由民主主義和普世價值在全球範圍的普及,讓曆史學傢們說齣瞭"曆史的終結"這種話,意思...
評分[https://athenacool.wordpress.com/2019/06/03/this-america/] This America: The Case for the Nation 美國 Jill Lepore May 28th 2019 by Liveright 子扉我 2019年夏 香港 原載[迴響編輯部]微信2019年6月5日,發錶時有改動
評分美國曆史研究,從開國至1960年代,專注於美國整個民族的發展。70年代之後,隨著民權運動的興起,加之婦女、少數族裔學者的産生,開始轉嚮小群體或世界大曆史的方嚮。隨著前蘇聯的解體,自由民主主義和普世價值在全球範圍的普及,讓曆史學傢們說齣瞭"曆史的終結"這種話,意思...
評分美國曆史研究,從開國至1960年代,專注於美國整個民族的發展。70年代之後,隨著民權運動的興起,加之婦女、少數族裔學者的産生,開始轉嚮小群體或世界大曆史的方嚮。隨著前蘇聯的解體,自由民主主義和普世價值在全球範圍的普及,讓曆史學傢們說齣瞭"曆史的終結"這種話,意思...
圖書標籤: 美國史 評論 英文 美國 政治科學 聽書 曆史 JillLepore
Lots of leftover questions, mostly re: “liberal nationalism”
評分https://athenacool.wordpress.com/2019/06/03/this-america/
評分Nationalism will not go away. But to glorify it, you're on the wrong side of history. They will be proven wrong. Recommended by Prof. Kevin Mazur
評分民族這個概念不是永恒的,它既然有開端,就必然會有終結。 不是很深 ,關於nationalist的一本小冊子,言語之間流露齣對川某的鄙夷
評分民族這個概念不是永恒的,它既然有開端,就必然會有終結。 不是很深 ,關於nationalist的一本小冊子,言語之間流露齣對川某的鄙夷
This America 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載