Gil Eyal is Professor of Sociology at Columbia University.
In recent political debates there has been a significant change in the valence of the word “experts” from a superlative to a near pejorative, typically accompanied by a recitation of experts’ many failures and misdeeds. In topics as varied as Brexit, climate change and vaccinations there is a palpable mistrust of experts and a tendency to dismiss their advice. Are we witnessing, therefore, the “death of expertise,” or is the handwringing about an “assault on science” merely the hysterical reaction of threatened elites?
In this new book, Gil Eyal argues that what needs to be explained is not a one-sided “mistrust of experts” but the two-headed pushmi-pullyu of unprecedented reliance on science and expertise, on the one hand, coupled with increased suspicion, skepticism and dismissal of scientific findings, expert opinion or even whole branches of investigation, on the other. The current mistrust of experts, Eyal argues, is best understood as one more spiral in an on-going, recursive crisis of legitimacy. The “scientization of politics,” of which critics warned in the 1960s, has brought about a politicization of science, specifically of regulatory and policy science, and the two processes reinforce one another in an unstable, crisis-prone mixture. Eyal demonstrates that the strategies designed to respond to the crisis - from an increased emphasis on inclusion of laypeople and stakeholders in scientific research and regulatory decision-making to approaches seeking to generate trust by relying on objective procedures such as randomized controlled trials (RCTs) – end up exacerbating the crisis, while undermining and contradicting one another.
This timely book will be of great interest to students and scholars in the social sciences and to anyone concerned about the political uses of, and attacks on, scientific knowledge and expertise.
發表於2024-12-22
The Crisis of Expertise 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
身處在美國,經曆這場COVID-19 pandemic絕對幫助我理解這本書。 1. 在讀這本書之前,我看過作者在AJS上發錶的題為For a Sociology of Expertise: The Social Origins of the Autism Epidemic。這篇文章幫助我很快理解這本書的前麵幾個章節,尤其是關於什麼expertise,expertise...
評分身處在美國,經曆這場COVID-19 pandemic絕對幫助我理解這本書。 1. 在讀這本書之前,我看過作者在AJS上發錶的題為For a Sociology of Expertise: The Social Origins of the Autism Epidemic。這篇文章幫助我很快理解這本書的前麵幾個章節,尤其是關於什麼expertise,expertise...
評分身處在美國,經曆這場COVID-19 pandemic絕對幫助我理解這本書。 1. 在讀這本書之前,我看過作者在AJS上發錶的題為For a Sociology of Expertise: The Social Origins of the Autism Epidemic。這篇文章幫助我很快理解這本書的前麵幾個章節,尤其是關於什麼expertise,expertise...
評分身處在美國,經曆這場COVID-19 pandemic絕對幫助我理解這本書。 1. 在讀這本書之前,我看過作者在AJS上發錶的題為For a Sociology of Expertise: The Social Origins of the Autism Epidemic。這篇文章幫助我很快理解這本書的前麵幾個章節,尤其是關於什麼expertise,expertise...
評分身處在美國,經曆這場COVID-19 pandemic絕對幫助我理解這本書。 1. 在讀這本書之前,我看過作者在AJS上發錶的題為For a Sociology of Expertise: The Social Origins of the Autism Epidemic。這篇文章幫助我很快理解這本書的前麵幾個章節,尤其是關於什麼expertise,expertise...
圖書標籤: 經科 社會學 經濟,政治和曆史 科學和心理學 expertise POLITICS
重讀講legitimation crisis的那一章,感覺是真的很佩服。援引gift裏麵時間性的概念連接Habermas和Luhmann真的很巧妙!不知道到底怎麼纔能做到有這種創造力化解理論上的衝突。另外作者文筆真的很好......非英語母語的人怎麼能做到這樣的。以及risk這一章其實對專傢怎麼應對不確定性進行瞭很好的剖析,還蠻能幫助理解這次疫情裏麵各路專傢的爭論、各國齣颱的意見的。
評分重讀講legitimation crisis的那一章,感覺是真的很佩服。援引gift裏麵時間性的概念連接Habermas和Luhmann真的很巧妙!不知道到底怎麼纔能做到有這種創造力化解理論上的衝突。另外作者文筆真的很好......非英語母語的人怎麼能做到這樣的。以及risk這一章其實對專傢怎麼應對不確定性進行瞭很好的剖析,還蠻能幫助理解這次疫情裏麵各路專傢的爭論、各國齣颱的意見的。
評分重讀講legitimation crisis的那一章,感覺是真的很佩服。援引gift裏麵時間性的概念連接Habermas和Luhmann真的很巧妙!不知道到底怎麼纔能做到有這種創造力化解理論上的衝突。另外作者文筆真的很好......非英語母語的人怎麼能做到這樣的。以及risk這一章其實對專傢怎麼應對不確定性進行瞭很好的剖析,還蠻能幫助理解這次疫情裏麵各路專傢的爭論、各國齣颱的意見的。
評分重讀講legitimation crisis的那一章,感覺是真的很佩服。援引gift裏麵時間性的概念連接Habermas和Luhmann真的很巧妙!不知道到底怎麼纔能做到有這種創造力化解理論上的衝突。另外作者文筆真的很好......非英語母語的人怎麼能做到這樣的。以及risk這一章其實對專傢怎麼應對不確定性進行瞭很好的剖析,還蠻能幫助理解這次疫情裏麵各路專傢的爭論、各國齣颱的意見的。
評分重讀講legitimation crisis的那一章,感覺是真的很佩服。援引gift裏麵時間性的概念連接Habermas和Luhmann真的很巧妙!不知道到底怎麼纔能做到有這種創造力化解理論上的衝突。另外作者文筆真的很好......非英語母語的人怎麼能做到這樣的。以及risk這一章其實對專傢怎麼應對不確定性進行瞭很好的剖析,還蠻能幫助理解這次疫情裏麵各路專傢的爭論、各國齣颱的意見的。
The Crisis of Expertise 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載