Xiaobin Yang is Croft Assistant Professor of Chinese Language and Literature in the Department of Modern Languages at the University of Mississippi, where he teaches contemporary Chinese literature, film, cultural theory, and comparative cultural studies. His academic publications include Lishi yu xiuci (History and rhetoric: Essays on contemporary Chinese literature) and Fouding de meixue (Negative aesthetics: Literary theory and cultural criticism of the Frankfurt school). An active researcher, Yang was a 2001 recipient of the prestigious Fulbright-Hays Faculty Research Abroad Grant awarded by the United States Department of Education.
发表于2024-11-25
The Chinese Postmodern 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
五四作家运用作者介入(authorial intervention)的手法,把表现主体(representational subject)总体化(totalize)成一个理想的历史主体,但在建构这个形象叙事过程中常常存在一种反讽,造成一种反效果。他们在德勒兹的概念中属于妄想狂(paranoid),把集中和统一的体系强加给不同...
评分五四作家运用作者介入(authorial intervention)的手法,把表现主体(representational subject)总体化(totalize)成一个理想的历史主体,但在建构这个形象叙事过程中常常存在一种反讽,造成一种反效果。他们在德勒兹的概念中属于妄想狂(paranoid),把集中和统一的体系强加给不同...
评分五四作家运用作者介入(authorial intervention)的手法,把表现主体(representational subject)总体化(totalize)成一个理想的历史主体,但在建构这个形象叙事过程中常常存在一种反讽,造成一种反效果。他们在德勒兹的概念中属于妄想狂(paranoid),把集中和统一的体系强加给不同...
评分五四作家运用作者介入(authorial intervention)的手法,把表现主体(representational subject)总体化(totalize)成一个理想的历史主体,但在建构这个形象叙事过程中常常存在一种反讽,造成一种反效果。他们在德勒兹的概念中属于妄想狂(paranoid),把集中和统一的体系强加给不同...
评分五四作家运用作者介入(authorial intervention)的手法,把表现主体(representational subject)总体化(totalize)成一个理想的历史主体,但在建构这个形象叙事过程中常常存在一种反讽,造成一种反效果。他们在德勒兹的概念中属于妄想狂(paranoid),把集中和统一的体系强加给不同...
图书标签: 现当代文学 中国文学 文学研究 后现代 先锋文学 Postmodern 文学批评 中国当代文学
The Chinese Postmodern is a pioneering study of contemporary Chinese avant-garde fiction from the perspective of cultural and literary postmodernity, historical trauma, and rhetorical irony. Showcasing the talents of such major writers as Can Xue, Ge Fei, Ma Yuan, Mo Yan, Xu Xiaohe, and Yu Hua, this volume focuses on the interplay between historical psychology and representational mode and between political discourse and literary rhetoric.
Xiaobin Yang draws on a number of theories, psychoanalysis and deconstruction in particular, and incorporates them into the sociohistorical approach to illuminate the nuances of literary and cultural phenomena. Revealing the hidden connection between the deconstructive mode of writing and the post-traumatic historical experience, The Chinese Postmodern shows how avant-garde literature brings about a heterogeneous literary paradigm that defies the dominant, subject-centered one in twentieth-century China.
Skillfully examining the problem of Chinese postmodernity against the background of culturo-political modernity in twentieth-century China, The Chinese Postmodern redefines Chinese modernity and postmodernity through textual analyses of canonical and avant-garde works.
In addition to being a pioneering study of contemporary Chinese avant-garde fiction, this challenging work is also an attempt to delineate the changes of literary paradigms in modern Chinese literature. By way of characterizing avant-garde fiction, it provides a macroscopic picture of twentieth-century Chinese literature that registers the sociohistorical trends of intellectual and cultural (post-)modernity. In this regard, it is also a theorization of the intellectual history of modern China.
如何定义后毛和后邓时期的中国本土语境下的后现代主义?毛和邓的政治范式(political paradigm)并不存在时间范畴(teleological)上的区别,所不同的是建立在物质价值观念上的乌托邦话语取代了作为精神层面乌托邦的共产主义。毛一系列的政治话语强调二元对立,以此来塑造历史的一体性与政权的合法性,其所体现出来的rationalization和totalization的模式,可以视为文学现代性的表征。鉴于此,一方面,后现代主义意图消解宏大的历史话语,以此来建立新的不让步的启蒙(uncompromising demystification);另一方面,主体的自我反思成为后毛邓时期后现代主义最明显的特质,文学的后现代性探索历史的暴力以及内在的被掩盖的个体。
评分卟噜……
评分卟噜……
评分如何定义后毛和后邓时期的中国本土语境下的后现代主义?毛和邓的政治范式(political paradigm)并不存在时间范畴(teleological)上的区别,所不同的是建立在物质价值观念上的乌托邦话语取代了作为精神层面乌托邦的共产主义。毛一系列的政治话语强调二元对立,以此来塑造历史的一体性与政权的合法性,其所体现出来的rationalization和totalization的模式,可以视为文学现代性的表征。鉴于此,一方面,后现代主义意图消解宏大的历史话语,以此来建立新的不让步的启蒙(uncompromising demystification);另一方面,主体的自我反思成为后毛邓时期后现代主义最明显的特质,文学的后现代性探索历史的暴力以及内在的被掩盖的个体。
评分如何定义后毛和后邓时期的中国本土语境下的后现代主义?毛和邓的政治范式(political paradigm)并不存在时间范畴(teleological)上的区别,所不同的是建立在物质价值观念上的乌托邦话语取代了作为精神层面乌托邦的共产主义。毛一系列的政治话语强调二元对立,以此来塑造历史的一体性与政权的合法性,其所体现出来的rationalization和totalization的模式,可以视为文学现代性的表征。鉴于此,一方面,后现代主义意图消解宏大的历史话语,以此来建立新的不让步的启蒙(uncompromising demystification);另一方面,主体的自我反思成为后毛邓时期后现代主义最明显的特质,文学的后现代性探索历史的暴力以及内在的被掩盖的个体。
The Chinese Postmodern 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书