This study of the policy-making process in China during the Sino–French controversy of 1880–1885 adds a new dimension to our understanding of China’s response to the West in the nineteenth century. The implicit threat presented by French efforts to extend her control into northern Vietnam was the catalyst in Chinese policy decisions, and Lloyd Eastman traces the dramatic process by which the problem was eventually resolved. Analyzing the complicated balance of internal political forces in the Ch’ing dynasty in the late nineteenth century, he makes the first thorough study of the factors which shaped Chinese foreign policy in this period.
Three major power groups affected the decision-making process: the throne, high administrative officials, and lesser officials whose role was largely ideological. Eastman shows the considerable extent to which the throne’s power was limited by the interests of the officials (or mandarins); discusses the role of ch’ing-i, or literati opinion; and emphasizes the importance of the conservative, low-ranking officials who stood overwhelmingly in opposition to the few proponents of reform and modernization and strongly influenced the course of Chinese policy. Discussing the diplomatic objectives involved—preservation of hegemony in Vietnam, reluctance to fight a war that might expose its military weakness, desire to save face—as manifestations of underlying cultural assumptions and values, Eastman offers a fresh perspective on the formulation of policy during the Ch’ing government’s confrontation with the Western powers.
發表於2024-11-17
Throne and Mandarins 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: 易勞逸 國際關係史 中國近代史
海外學界關於中法戰爭的好書。 在晚清決策過程中聚焦於帝後、李鴻章、清議人士三大持份者,再結閤地方督撫檢視政策執行力與帝後決策調整之關係。由此構成分析中法戰爭時期清廷對外政策的一條線索。 相比起那些堆砌史料說故事,同時又混雜著民族主義的述史方式,Eastman先生這部50多年前的作品讀起來要有趣多瞭。 大大方方承認失敗就好瞭,莫要執拗地堅持甚麽「不敗而敗,不勝而勝」的想法。
評分海外學界關於中法戰爭的好書。 在晚清決策過程中聚焦於帝後、李鴻章、清議人士三大持份者,再結閤地方督撫檢視政策執行力與帝後決策調整之關係。由此構成分析中法戰爭時期清廷對外政策的一條線索。 相比起那些堆砌史料說故事,同時又混雜著民族主義的述史方式,Eastman先生這部50多年前的作品讀起來要有趣多瞭。 大大方方承認失敗就好瞭,莫要執拗地堅持甚麽「不敗而敗,不勝而勝」的想法。
評分海外學界關於中法戰爭的好書。 在晚清決策過程中聚焦於帝後、李鴻章、清議人士三大持份者,再結閤地方督撫檢視政策執行力與帝後決策調整之關係。由此構成分析中法戰爭時期清廷對外政策的一條線索。 相比起那些堆砌史料說故事,同時又混雜著民族主義的述史方式,Eastman先生這部50多年前的作品讀起來要有趣多瞭。 大大方方承認失敗就好瞭,莫要執拗地堅持甚麽「不敗而敗,不勝而勝」的想法。
評分海外學界關於中法戰爭的好書。 在晚清決策過程中聚焦於帝後、李鴻章、清議人士三大持份者,再結閤地方督撫檢視政策執行力與帝後決策調整之關係。由此構成分析中法戰爭時期清廷對外政策的一條線索。 相比起那些堆砌史料說故事,同時又混雜著民族主義的述史方式,Eastman先生這部50多年前的作品讀起來要有趣多瞭。 大大方方承認失敗就好瞭,莫要執拗地堅持甚麽「不敗而敗,不勝而勝」的想法。
評分海外學界關於中法戰爭的好書。 在晚清決策過程中聚焦於帝後、李鴻章、清議人士三大持份者,再結閤地方督撫檢視政策執行力與帝後決策調整之關係。由此構成分析中法戰爭時期清廷對外政策的一條線索。 相比起那些堆砌史料說故事,同時又混雜著民族主義的述史方式,Eastman先生這部50多年前的作品讀起來要有趣多瞭。 大大方方承認失敗就好瞭,莫要執拗地堅持甚麽「不敗而敗,不勝而勝」的想法。
Throne and Mandarins 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載