In Defense of Legal Positivism 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书

☆☆☆☆☆
简体网页||繁体网页

In Defense of Legal Positivism 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书著者简介

In Defense of Legal Positivism 电子书图书目录

下载链接在页面底部

点击这里下载

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 复制链接

想要找书就要到本本书屋

onlinetoolsland.com

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

发表于2024-11-22

In Defense of Legal Positivism 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书

喜欢 In Defense of Legal Positivism 电子书的读者还喜欢

In Defense of Legal Positivism 电子书读后感

评分☆☆☆☆☆

类似图书点击查看全场最低价

出版者:Oxford University Press, USA

作者:Matthew H. Kramer

出品人:

页数:324

译者:

出版时间:2003-05-22

价格:USD 55.00

装帧:Paperback

isbn号码:9780199264834

丛书系列:

图书标签: 法哲学英文原版

In Defense of Legal Positivism 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书图书描述

In Defense of Legal Positivism is an uncompromising defence of legal positivism that insists on the separability of law and morality. After distinguishing among three facets of morality, Matthew Kramer explores a variety of ways in which law has been perceived as integrally connected to each of those facets. Some of the chapters pose arguments against other major theorists such as David Lyons, Lon Fuller, Joseph Raz, Michael Detmold, Ronald Dworkin, Nigel Simmonds, John Finnis, Philip Soper, neil McCormick, gerald Postema, Stephen Perry, and Michael Moore, while others extend rather than defend legal positivism; they refine the insights of legal positivism and develop the implications of those insights in strikingly novel directions. The book concludes with a detailed discussion of the obligation to obey the lae- a discussion that highlights the strengths of legal positivism in the domain of political philosophy as much as in the domain of jurisprudence.

In Defense of Legal Positivism 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书

想要找书就要到本本书屋

onlinetoolsland.com

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

In Defense of Legal Positivism 2024 pdf epub mobi 用户评价

评分☆☆☆☆☆

只翻了上半部。Kramer文本解读功夫是一流的，非常细致地核心文献梳理和剖析，但是他似乎没有抓住实证主义核心立场或者说持有一种非常极端的立场，认为法律和道德在任何意义上不应当有关联。在剖析德沃金学说时，Kramer显然没有切中后者与哈特讨论的关键。在批评Raz时很可能误伤了实证主义对法律规范性的解释力。唯有在讨论富勒时，比较成功。

评分☆☆☆☆☆