Henk S. Versnel, Ph.D. (1970) in Classics (Leiden), is Emeritus Professor in Ancient History (Universiteit Leiden). He has published extensively on Greek and Roman myth, ritual, magic and religion, including two volumes on "Inconsistencies in Greek and Roman Religion" (Brill, 1990 and 1993).
This is the first of a two-volume collection of studies in inconsistencies in Greek and Roman religion. Their common aim is to argue for the historical relevance of various types of ambiguity and dissonance. The first volume focuses on the central paradoxes in ancient henotheism. The term 'henotheism' -- a modern formation after the stereotyped acclamation: #EIS O QEOS# ("one is the god"), common to early Christianity and contemporaneous paganism -- denotes the specific devotion to one particular god without denying the existence of, or even cultic attention to, other gods. After its prime in the twenties and thirties of this century the term fell into disuse. Nonetheless, the notion of henotheism represents one of the most remarkable and significant shifts in Graeco-Roman religion and hence deserves fresh reconsideration.
兩部麯首作,序言堪為希臘宗教入門讀物:如何考察inconsistency,藉用cognitive dissonance概念,對Vernant和Burkert爭論的基本解釋,人類學和心理學介入。本捲主要講Henotheism【參見Coping章3&5】,一二章上佳,三尚可。四星半。
评分兩部麯首作,序言堪為希臘宗教入門讀物:如何考察inconsistency,藉用cognitive dissonance概念,對Vernant和Burkert爭論的基本解釋,人類學和心理學介入。本捲主要講Henotheism【參見Coping章3&5】,一二章上佳,三尚可。四星半。
评分兩部麯首作,序言堪為希臘宗教入門讀物:如何考察inconsistency,藉用cognitive dissonance概念,對Vernant和Burkert爭論的基本解釋,人類學和心理學介入。本捲主要講Henotheism【參見Coping章3&5】,一二章上佳,三尚可。四星半。
评分兩部麯首作,序言堪為希臘宗教入門讀物:如何考察inconsistency,藉用cognitive dissonance概念,對Vernant和Burkert爭論的基本解釋,人類學和心理學介入。本捲主要講Henotheism【參見Coping章3&5】,一二章上佳,三尚可。四星半。
评分兩部麯首作,序言堪為希臘宗教入門讀物:如何考察inconsistency,藉用cognitive dissonance概念,對Vernant和Burkert爭論的基本解釋,人類學和心理學介入。本捲主要講Henotheism【參見Coping章3&5】,一二章上佳,三尚可。四星半。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有