Henk S. Versnel, Ph.D. (1970) in Classics (Leiden), is Emeritus Professor in Ancient History (Universiteit Leiden). He has published extensively on Greek and Roman myth, ritual, magic and religion, including two volumes on "Inconsistencies in Greek and Roman Religion" (Brill, 1990 and 1993).
This is the first of a two-volume collection of studies in inconsistencies in Greek and Roman religion. Their common aim is to argue for the historical relevance of various types of ambiguity and dissonance. The first volume focuses on the central paradoxes in ancient henotheism. The term 'henotheism' -- a modern formation after the stereotyped acclamation: #EIS O QEOS# ("one is the god"), common to early Christianity and contemporaneous paganism -- denotes the specific devotion to one particular god without denying the existence of, or even cultic attention to, other gods. After its prime in the twenties and thirties of this century the term fell into disuse. Nonetheless, the notion of henotheism represents one of the most remarkable and significant shifts in Graeco-Roman religion and hence deserves fresh reconsideration.
發表於2024-11-25
Inconsistencies in Greek and Roman Religion I 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: 古典學 greek 西洋古代 羅馬 希臘 宗教史 外語 古希臘
兩部麯首作,序言堪為希臘宗教入門讀物:如何考察inconsistency,藉用cognitive dissonance概念,對Vernant和Burkert爭論的基本解釋,人類學和心理學介入。本捲主要講Henotheism【參見Coping章3&5】,一二章上佳,三尚可。四星半。
評分兩部麯首作,序言堪為希臘宗教入門讀物:如何考察inconsistency,藉用cognitive dissonance概念,對Vernant和Burkert爭論的基本解釋,人類學和心理學介入。本捲主要講Henotheism【參見Coping章3&5】,一二章上佳,三尚可。四星半。
評分兩部麯首作,序言堪為希臘宗教入門讀物:如何考察inconsistency,藉用cognitive dissonance概念,對Vernant和Burkert爭論的基本解釋,人類學和心理學介入。本捲主要講Henotheism【參見Coping章3&5】,一二章上佳,三尚可。四星半。
評分兩部麯首作,序言堪為希臘宗教入門讀物:如何考察inconsistency,藉用cognitive dissonance概念,對Vernant和Burkert爭論的基本解釋,人類學和心理學介入。本捲主要講Henotheism【參見Coping章3&5】,一二章上佳,三尚可。四星半。
評分兩部麯首作,序言堪為希臘宗教入門讀物:如何考察inconsistency,藉用cognitive dissonance概念,對Vernant和Burkert爭論的基本解釋,人類學和心理學介入。本捲主要講Henotheism【參見Coping章3&5】,一二章上佳,三尚可。四星半。
Inconsistencies in Greek and Roman Religion I 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載