Early Christian Thought and the Classical Tradition

出版者:Oxford University Press, USA

作者:Henry Chadwick

页数:182

出版时间:1984-04-26

价格:USD 50.00

装帧:Paperback

isbn号码:9780198266730

图书标签:基督教Christianity西洋古代西方“古典”学英文原版早期教会文化研究教育研究

The historian of western culture cannot travel far without discovering that the roots of many twentieth-century questions lie in the ancient dialogue between the early Christians and culture of the old classical world. This book takes three Christian thinkers: Justin, clement of Alexandria, and Origen, and shows what the debate looked like from the Christian side. It draws on the pagan critics of the church to illustrate the case the Christians had to answer. The examination of the Christian synthesis illustrates the extent to which penetrating criticism of the classical tradition was combined with a profound acceptance of its humanism.

用户评价

与Early Christianity and Greek Paideia第三至五讲可对读。以前自己太忽视查士丁了，虽然读完觉得第21页那个并不太高的总结仍然非常合适；Clement的部分重视“身体”的讨论，可惜自己想看教育问题；Origen是全书的亮点，不愧是Contra Celsum译者，文笔很好把Origen写得有学问又任性，相比之下Clement简直是刻板绅士嘛哈哈~第四讲结尾讨论Origen与正统的部分值得好好分析。以及书名只写这仨人有点对不起贯穿全书的Celsus嗯。查士丁对希腊哲学的吸纳谈得还不太清楚，是本书一个弱点。瑕不掩瑜，还是非常值得一读的。

与Early Christianity and Greek Paideia第三至五讲可对读。以前自己太忽视查士丁了，虽然读完觉得第21页那个并不太高的总结仍然非常合适；Clement的部分重视“身体”的讨论，可惜自己想看教育问题；Origen是全书的亮点，不愧是Contra Celsum译者，文笔很好把Origen写得有学问又任性，相比之下Clement简直是刻板绅士嘛哈哈~第四讲结尾讨论Origen与正统的部分值得好好分析。以及书名只写这仨人有点对不起贯穿全书的Celsus嗯。查士丁对希腊哲学的吸纳谈得还不太清楚，是本书一个弱点。瑕不掩瑜，还是非常值得一读的。

It is a fantastic intro to some prominent figures in the patristic period. To understand ancient interpreters, we need to note their context where Greek thought was dominant. The tension and accommodation between philosophy and Christianity are inevitable. The notion that Christianity is the fulfillment of all philosophy originated in this period.

与Early Christianity and Greek Paideia第三至五讲可对读。以前自己太忽视查士丁了，虽然读完觉得第21页那个并不太高的总结仍然非常合适；Clement的部分重视“身体”的讨论，可惜自己想看教育问题；Origen是全书的亮点，不愧是Contra Celsum译者，文笔很好把Origen写得有学问又任性，相比之下Clement简直是刻板绅士嘛哈哈~第四讲结尾讨论Origen与正统的部分值得好好分析。以及书名只写这仨人有点对不起贯穿全书的Celsus嗯。查士丁对希腊哲学的吸纳谈得还不太清楚，是本书一个弱点。瑕不掩瑜，还是非常值得一读的。

It is a fantastic intro to some prominent figures in the patristic period. To understand ancient interpreters, we need to note their context where Greek thought was dominant. The tension and accommodation between philosophy and Christianity are inevitable. The notion that Christianity is the fulfillment of all philosophy originated in this period.