Do moral questions have objective answers? In this great debate, Gilbert Harman explains and argues for relativism, emotivism, and moral scepticism. In his view, moral disagreements are like disagreements about what to pay for a house; there are no correct answers ahead of time, except in relation to one or another moral framework.
Independently, Judith Jarvis Thomson examines what she takes to be the case against moral objectivity, and rejects it; she argues that it is possible to find out the correct answers to some moral questions. In her view, some moral disagreements are like disagreements about whether the house has a ghost.
Harman and Thomson then reply to each other. This important, lively accessible exchange will be invaluable to all students of moral theory and meta-ethics.
值得思考的是:为什么现在这个世界正在向着二元对立的结构发展? Case study: LGBT rights protests surrounding the 2014 Winter Olympics
评分值得思考的是:为什么现在这个世界正在向着二元对立的结构发展? Case study: LGBT rights protests surrounding the 2014 Winter Olympics
评分值得思考的是:为什么现在这个世界正在向着二元对立的结构发展? Case study: LGBT rights protests surrounding the 2014 Winter Olympics
评分值得思考的是:为什么现在这个世界正在向着二元对立的结构发展? Case study: LGBT rights protests surrounding the 2014 Winter Olympics
评分值得思考的是:为什么现在这个世界正在向着二元对立的结构发展? Case study: LGBT rights protests surrounding the 2014 Winter Olympics
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有