Michel Foucault was one of the most influential thinkers in the contemporary world. Social scientist and historian of ideas, Foucault was Professor of History of Systems of Thought at the College de France. He wrote frequently for French newspapers and reviews, and edited Critique. Among his many publications are Madness and Civilization (1961), The Archaeology of Knowledge (1972), The Birth of the Clinic (1973), Discipline and Punish (1975), and three volumes of the History of Sexuality: Volume One, the Will to Knowledge (1976); Volume Two, The Use of Pleasure (1984); and Volume Three: The Care for the Self (1984). Professor Foucault died in 1984.
In the middle ages there were gaols and dungeons, but punishment was for the most part a spectacle. The economic changes and growing popular dissent of the eighteenth century made necessary a more systematic control over the individual members of society, and this in effect meant a change from punishment, which chastised the body, to reform, which touched the soul.
Foucault shows in fascinating detail the development of the Western system of prisons, police organizations, administrative and legal hierarchies of social control --- and the growth of disciplinary society as a whole. He also reveals that the comparison between a school and a prison is not purely facetious --- prisons, schools, factories, barracks and hospitals all share a common organization, in which it is possible to control the use of an individual's time and space hour by hour.
文明史的演進路嚮始終呈現齣放射的態勢,為積極自由的抗爭與為消極自由的籌措是其中確然存在的一條。無論是尋求個人權利抑或製度保障,一以貫之的形態終不過是專製君主與黎民黔首、知識精英與普羅大眾、權力階層與弱勢群體之間的博弈。 在這種以權力為核心的博弈中,治理與被治...
評分覺得福柯所有的論證就是為瞭說明全景敞視主義世界的到來,而世界確實如此。兩個地方可以證明 一是監控攝像頭;而是社交網絡。 我們不自願的處在全景敞視社會中——因為有無處不在的監控攝像頭(它的大量存在以緻使其迷失瞭原始的目的——是控製犯罪還是監視每一個人,讓隱私無...
評分我說為“主要”的部分並不是說該書的絕大部分,所以是指核心部分。那本書雖然是福科的第一部成熟的作品,可是其中觀點卻極大的收到其他人的影響,比如馬剋思、伊波利特和康吉蘭,而這些人給與福科的影響最主要的就是體現在該書內容的“絕大部分”,同時構成瞭該書的主體—...
評分很愛這本書,裏麵有些關於社會和Panopticon的說法特彆特彆精彩!終於讓我喜歡上福柯瞭。
评分很愛這本書,裏麵有些關於社會和Panopticon的說法特彆特彆精彩!終於讓我喜歡上福柯瞭。
评分思想的震撼
评分討論裏倒是發現瞭兩個問題,福柯多大程度上在說institution,還是彌散的權力和知識;如果說power is exercised, not owned,那知識呢?另外,可以說福柯是apolitical的嗎?
评分panopticism的想法很有趣!!
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有