"The thesis is radical," writes Marshall Sahlins of this landmark text inanthropology and political science. "We conventionally define the state as theregulation of violence; it may be the origin of it. Clastres's thesis is thateconomic expropriation and political coercion are inconsistent with the character oftribal society - which is to say, with the greater part of human history."Can therebe a society that is not divided into oppressors and oppressed, or that refusescoercive state apparatuses? In this beautifully written book, Pierre Clastres offersexamples of South American Indian groups that, although without hierarchicalleadership, were both affluent and complex. In so doing he refutes the usualnegative definition of tribal society and poses its order as a radical critique ofour own Western state of power.Born in 1934, Pierre Clastres was educated at theSorbonne; throughout the 1960s he lived with Indian groups in Paraguay andVenezuela. From 1971 until his death in 1979 he was Director of Studies at the fifthsection of the Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes in Paris and held the Chair ofReligion and Societies of the South American Indians there.Robert Hurley is thetranslator of the History of Sexuality by Michel Foucault and cotranslator ofAnti-Oedipus by Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari.
發表於2024-12-19
Society Against the State 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
(我原計劃齣版這本書的中文版,但是選題被公司否決,因此發在這裏,如若它對看到的人有微弱的幫助,我也就感到欣慰瞭。) 社會反對國傢 原始社會是沒有國傢的社會。這一事實論斷本身準確無誤,而實際上隱含著一種想法,一種會立刻質疑政治人類學是否是一門嚴格科學的價值判斷...
評分(我原計劃齣版這本書的中文版,但是選題被公司否決,因此發在這裏,如若它對看到的人有微弱的幫助,我也就感到欣慰瞭。) 社會反對國傢 原始社會是沒有國傢的社會。這一事實論斷本身準確無誤,而實際上隱含著一種想法,一種會立刻質疑政治人類學是否是一門嚴格科學的價值判斷...
評分(我原計劃齣版這本書的中文版,但是選題被公司否決,因此發在這裏,如若它對看到的人有微弱的幫助,我也就感到欣慰瞭。) 社會反對國傢 原始社會是沒有國傢的社會。這一事實論斷本身準確無誤,而實際上隱含著一種想法,一種會立刻質疑政治人類學是否是一門嚴格科學的價值判斷...
評分(我原計劃齣版這本書的中文版,但是選題被公司否決,因此發在這裏,如若它對看到的人有微弱的幫助,我也就感到欣慰瞭。) 社會反對國傢 原始社會是沒有國傢的社會。這一事實論斷本身準確無誤,而實際上隱含著一種想法,一種會立刻質疑政治人類學是否是一門嚴格科學的價值判斷...
評分(我原計劃齣版這本書的中文版,但是選題被公司否決,因此發在這裏,如若它對看到的人有微弱的幫助,我也就感到欣慰瞭。) 社會反對國傢 原始社會是沒有國傢的社會。這一事實論斷本身準確無誤,而實際上隱含著一種想法,一種會立刻質疑政治人類學是否是一門嚴格科學的價值判斷...
圖書標籤:
The book criticized the western political power, arguing it is only one model of state, but not the only one. The author holds against the 'common knowledge' that our modern state form is the ultimate or superior political configuration.
評分The book criticized the western political power, arguing it is only one model of state, but not the only one. The author holds against the 'common knowledge' that our modern state form is the ultimate or superior political configuration.
評分The book criticized the western political power, arguing it is only one model of state, but not the only one. The author holds against the 'common knowledge' that our modern state form is the ultimate or superior political configuration.
評分The book criticized the western political power, arguing it is only one model of state, but not the only one. The author holds against the 'common knowledge' that our modern state form is the ultimate or superior political configuration.
評分The book criticized the western political power, arguing it is only one model of state, but not the only one. The author holds against the 'common knowledge' that our modern state form is the ultimate or superior political configuration.
Society Against the State 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載