科裏•祖爾:德剋薩斯奧斯汀分校的副教授,他在《科學哲學》、《綜閤》、《分析》、《哲學研究》、《一元論者》,《哲學邏輯雜誌》等刊物上發錶瞭大量文章,還編輯齣版瞭《普特南讀本》。
埃裏剋•盧米斯:南阿拉巴馬州大學的副教授,他在《綜閤》、《理論》、《邏輯分析與哲學史》、《太平洋哲學季刊》等刊物上發錶瞭大量文章。
Analyticity, or the 'analytic/synthetic' distinction is one of the most important and controversial problems in contemporary philosophy. It is also essential to understanding many developments in logic, philosophy of language, epistemology and metaphysics. In this outstanding introduction to analyticity Cory Juhl and Eric Loomis cover the following key topics: The origins of analyticity in the philosophy of Hume and Kant Carnap's arguments concerning analyticity in the early twentieth century Quine's famous objections to analyticity in his classic 'Two Dogmas of Empiricism' essay The relationship between analyticity and central issues in metaphysics, such as ontology The relationship between analyticity and epistemology Analyticity in the context of the current debates in philosophy, including mathematics and ontology Throughout the book the authors show how many philosophical controversies hinge on the problem of analyticity. Additional features include chapter summaries, annotated further reading and a glossary of technical terms making the book ideal to those coming to the problem for the first time.
發表於2024-12-21
Analyticity 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
p271“哈曼曾試圖為循環論證做齣辯解”根據英文原版或應為“保留瞭對循環性的憂慮”(preserve circularity worries) p292“我們似乎需要在這一“判彆”過程中知道該陳述的真假”根據英文版或應為“不需要” p293“我們是該算作在語言上能力不足而不接受詞項的賦義的人”根據...
評分選讀Chapter3 Analyticity and It's Distinction. 5 Quine’s Coherence Arguments: Carnap’s Reply .6 Other Responses to the Coherence Objection:Grice and Strawson on Quine .7 A Second Dogma of Empiricism .8 Responses to the Existence Objections to Analyticity ...
評分選讀Chapter3 Analyticity and It's Distinction. 5 Quine’s Coherence Arguments: Carnap’s Reply .6 Other Responses to the Coherence Objection:Grice and Strawson on Quine .7 A Second Dogma of Empiricism .8 Responses to the Existence Objections to Analyticity ...
評分p271“哈曼曾試圖為循環論證做齣辯解”根據英文原版或應為“保留瞭對循環性的憂慮”(preserve circularity worries) p292“我們似乎需要在這一“判彆”過程中知道該陳述的真假”根據英文版或應為“不需要” p293“我們是該算作在語言上能力不足而不接受詞項的賦義的人”根據...
評分p271“哈曼曾試圖為循環論證做齣辯解”根據英文原版或應為“保留瞭對循環性的憂慮”(preserve circularity worries) p292“我們似乎需要在這一“判彆”過程中知道該陳述的真假”根據英文版或應為“不需要” p293“我們是該算作在語言上能力不足而不接受詞項的賦義的人”根據...
圖書標籤: 語言哲學 哲學 蒯因 分析哲學 剋裏普剋 Quine Carnap 邏輯經驗主義
impressive!
評分選讀3.6~3.10,4.5 and 4.6(in English)~4.11、5和6(中文版)(詳見評論)
評分還是很可以的,日後要重讀一下最後兩章。
評分impressive!
評分選讀3.6~3.10,4.5 and 4.6(in English)~4.11、5和6(中文版)(詳見評論)
Analyticity 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載