Baldness

出版者:McFarland & Company

作者:Kerry Segrave

页数:216

出版时间:2008-12-17

价格:USD 29.95

装帧:Paperback

isbn号码:9780786440795

具体描述

Ever feel like doing something really nasty to someone who makes a crack about your shining pate? According to Kerry Segrave, author of Baldness: A Social History (1996, McFarland), you’re not alone.

In the opening paragraph of the first chapter, Segrave relates the Old Testament story of the prophet Elisha, whose “overreaction” to taunting by a group of little children was to curse them in the name of the Lord, after which a she-bear came out of the woods and destroyed 42 of the little tykes.

Segrave also informs us that Elisha then went out and applied bear grease to his head, a supposed cure for baldness that remained popular all the way into the 16th century. Since there’s no more mention of him being mocked, Elisha surmises that the cure must have worked, although it could also be argued that maybe potential taunters just decided they could control their tongues rather than risk disembowelment by bear.

Baldness_bookcoverBecause it was written 14 years ago, Segrave’s book is not always au courant on all matters, but it’s an entertaining and informative read. The subject is strictly male pattern baldness, and in 170 pages (plus 23 pages of notes and a 14-page bibliography), Segrave delves into baldness in ancient times; baldness in current times; causes of and cures for baldness; head coverings; hair loss among celebrities and politicians; attitudes about baldness and, in one chapter all to itself, Rogaine.

That’s a lot of ground to cover, but Segrave does it well. That said, much of the book, while entertaining, does tend to come across somewhat like a list, albeit a detailed one. For example, in the chapter on celebrities and politicians, too much space is taken up telling us that certain actors or officials were bald and proud of it, or bald and ashamed of it, and not enough space is devoted to giving us a greater variety of information about each individual.

When Segrave does give the reader that kind of information, it produces memorable moments, such as Sen. Jake Garn’s comment that “every man is given a certain amount of hormones and if some want to waste theirs growing hair, that’s their business.” The author also gains points for his use of an alternative name for the comb-over: “illusion styling.”

Not unexpectedly, one of the most enjoyable parts of the book is that which deals with bogus causes and cures. While all can sympathize with the desire to understand why one man is bald and another isn’t, it nevertheless is amusing to read the opinion from 1909 of a certain Dr. J. O. Cobb, one of a surprising many who believed that hats caused baldness. Cobb believed specifically that the straw hat was the worst offender in the baldness game. (Why? Because it was easier to blow away, and so a man would force it down on his head harder and tighter, damaging the hair and cutting off circulation to the head.)

Some proponents of “interesting” theories were quite well known. Charles Dickens, for example, argued that thicker, longer beards resulted in baldness, basically because there was only so much hair to go around on the head and growing it on the chin deprived it from growing on the skull.

Arguably the most entertaining theory pertaining to the cause of baldness comes from Dr. Delos Parker, who in 1901 announced that hairlessness was a result of breathing. Not just any breathing, mind you, but abdominal breathing, in which the diaphragm was used to a great extent. His reasoning seems to have been that women, because of their tight corsets, didn’t use their diaphragms as much and therefore retained their hair.

The most depressing chapter in this social history is that titled “Bald Attitude,” which is largely devoted to the negative connotations that are largely applied to baldness by both those who experience it personally on their own crowns and those who judgmentally comment on the crowns of others. It’s no secret that despite advances society still has a tendency to view baldness in fairly negative terms. Segrave doesn’t concentrate solely on the negative, as he provides examples of men (and women) who have positive attitudes toward and experiences of baldness; but overwhelmingly those with a negative opinion are given far more space.

Although the chapter on Rogaine is titled “This Is Not Snake Oil,” Segrave intends that title satirically. By the end of this section, the author lays out numerous examples of the iffy circumstances under which Rogaine produces the desired results and takes joy in stating that the drug has not turned out to be the cash cow it was intended to be, implying that this is because a man who may be missing his hair is not necessarily missing his brain and won’t get taken to the cleaners solely on the off chance that he might grow a little bit of hair.

Baldness: A Social History ends rather abruptly with the Rogaine chapter. One wishes that Segrave had provided a summing-up chapter. At the very least, one would have welcomed a closing quote, to mirror the quotes that open each of the chapters. Since Segrave neglected to do this, I will instead end this review with the amusing quote (from a 1959 issue of Newsweek) that opens chapter 3:

“Say, you know, Irving, your hair is getting thin?”

“So who likes fat hair?”

目录信息

Bald facts and fictions --
hats, ivory domes, razors, and dangerous barbers --
Everything under the sun --
Rubbing, blistering, and electrifying --
Desperately seeking hair --
Wigs and weaving --
Implants --
Transplants, flaps, and scalp reductions --
Celebrities and politicians --
Bald attitude --
This is not snake oil.
· · · · · · (收起)

用户评价

我必须说，这部作品的语言风格极其独特，充满了后现代主义的疏离感和一种近乎冷峻的观察视角。它似乎并不急于给你一个明确的答案或清晰的道德指引，而是将碎片化的信息和意识流的叙述抛给你，让你自己去拼凑和解读。叙事者像一个冷眼旁观的记录者，用极其精准和克制的词汇，描绘着现代都市生活中那种难以言喻的焦虑和异化感。我特别欣赏作者在结构上进行的大胆尝试，时间线被故意打乱，不同的视角和文体（比如插入的学术摘录、广告语，甚至是一份遗失的清单）相互碰撞，营造出一种梦境般的逻辑。这需要读者投入极大的专注力，但一旦你适应了它的“语境”，那种智力上的满足感是无与伦比的。它探讨的议题非常前沿，关乎身份认同在信息洪流中的消解，以及个体在宏大系统面前的无力感。说实话，阅读过程是挑战性的，但这种挑战性恰恰是其魅力所在，它拒绝平庸，迫使你跳出舒适区去思考。对于那些厌倦了传统线性叙事，追求更深层次文本探索的读者来说，这本书无疑是一剂强心针。

这本书的魅力在于它对历史的重构和对民间传说的奇妙融合。它讲述的是一个架空王朝的故事，但其内核却充满了对真实历史中权力运作的深刻洞察。作者没有采用宏大的史诗叙事，而是通过几个不同阶层人物——一个失意的文官、一个身负秘密的刺客、以及一位深居宫中的太后——的视角，来展现朝堂斗争的阴谋诡谲。我最欣赏的是作者构建的那个世界的细节，无论是服饰、礼仪，还是哲学思想，都显得考究而真实，显示了作者在资料搜集上的巨大投入。特别是关于那个神秘教派的描绘，充满了东方奇幻的色彩，将武侠的飘逸与政治的残酷巧妙地结合在一起。情节设计上，反转接连不断，每一次你以为看清了真相时，作者总能抛出新的证据，颠覆你的认知。这本书节奏紧凑，信息量爆炸，读起来让人有种停不下来的感觉，仿佛自己也置身于那刀光剑影的宫廷之中，每一步都如履薄冰。对于喜欢历史架空、权谋斗争以及精妙世界设定的爱好者来说，这是一本不容错过的杰作。

这部科幻小说无疑是近年来最富想象力的作品之一。它没有沉溺于传统的太空歌剧式描写，而是将焦点集中在哲学思辨和认知科学的交叉领域。故事设定在一个人类文明已经高度依赖某种虚拟现实共生系统的未来，探讨的核心问题是：当感官输入可以被完美模拟时，我们如何定义“真实”？作者构建了一个极其复杂的系统逻辑，涉及的理论知识储备非常扎实，但表达起来却出乎意料地清晰易懂。角色的驱动力更多来源于对知识的好奇和对“世界真相”的探索欲，而非简单的生存或战斗。我尤其佩服作者在构建“反乌托邦”图景时的精妙之处——这个社会表面上极度舒适和高效，但其代价却是对人类自由意志的微妙侵蚀。阅读过程中，我的思维被不断地拉伸和重组，不停地在书中的“现实”和我们自己的“现实”之间进行比对和审视。这本书的结构也非常巧妙，采用了多层嵌套的叙事，每一层揭示都将我们推向更深的谜团。这是一部需要读者全神贯注，并且读完后会久久不散，让你开始怀疑自己周遭世界的“硬核”科幻，绝对是智力上的盛宴。

这是一个极其温馨且感人的成长故事，充满了对童年纯真年代的怀旧与追忆。故事的焦点集中在一个夏日，一群住在同一条街上的孩子，因为一个共同的秘密，建立了一种超越年龄的友谊。作者的笔触极其细腻温柔，擅长捕捉那些稍纵即逝的情感瞬间：比如夕阳下追逐嬉闹的汗水味，比如偷偷分享零食时的那种默契，以及面对成长中第一次分离时的那种懵懂的伤感。这本书的优点在于它对“小”事物的重视，它没有惊天动地的事件，但每一个细节都闪耀着人性的光辉。我特别喜欢作者处理家庭关系的方式，那些不完美的父母，那些充满爱意的唠叨，都显得那么真实可信。阅读这本书的过程，就像是翻看自己旧相册一样，让人忍不住微笑，又偶尔泛起一丝对逝去时光的惆怅。它像一杯温暖的牛奶，在忙碌和喧嚣的生活中，提供了一个完美的避风港。它提醒我们，生命中最珍贵的部分，往往存在于那些最简单、最纯粹的人际连接之中。读完后，感觉心灵被洗涤了一遍，对身边的人和事都多了一份珍惜。

这本小说读起来真是让人眼前一亮，作者的叙事功力简直是炉火纯青。故事围绕着一个偏远的渔村展开，那里的人们过着日复一日的平静生活，直到一场突如其来的风暴打破了所有的宁静。我尤其喜欢作者对环境细致入微的描写，那咸湿的海风、摇曳的船帆，仿佛都能透过文字扑面而来。主人公的内心挣扎和成长线刻画得极其深刻，他并非传统意义上的英雄，而是一个充满了人性弱点和矛盾的普通人。每一次重大的决定，都伴随着巨大的情感代价，这让角色的真实感倍增。情节推进上，节奏把握得非常到位，张弛有度，既有令人屏息的悬念，也有让人会心一笑的温情瞬间。尽管故事背景设定在这样一个封闭的环境，但探讨的主题却是普世的：关于责任、失去与救赎。书中的配角群像也塑造得非常成功，每个人都有自己鲜明的个性和复杂的背景故事，共同编织了一幅丰富立体的生活画卷。读完之后，心中久久不能平静，那种余韵悠长，让人忍不住想重新翻开书页，去体会那些被自己可能忽略的微妙之处。这绝对是一部值得反复阅读的佳作，它不仅仅是一个故事，更像是一次深入人心的生命体验。