Freud and the Bolsheviks

出版者:Yale Univ. Pr.

作者:Martin A. Miller

页数:256

出版时间:1998

价格:$ 56.50

isbn号码:9780300068108

具体描述

Named an Outstanding Academic Title by Choice Magazine

This fascinating book is the first comprehensive history of psychoanalysis in Russia from the last years of the tsars to the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. Using rare Russian sources and newly opened Soviet archives, Martin A. Miller explores Sigmund Freud`s influence in Russia during the twentieth century, discusses the lives of the Russian Freudians, and explicates for the first time original Russian psychoanalytic case studies.

The book begins with an investigation of the cultural currents in Russian society during the last decades of the tsarist regime. Discontented with treatment modes in Russia, a small group of Russian psychiatrists sought training with Freud, Carl Jung, and Karl Abraham and by 1917 had established the first psychoanalytic institute outside Vienna and Berlin and the first Russian psychoanalytic journal. Contrary to common belief, the psychoanalytic community did not disappear when the Bolsheviks seized power. Miller details how Soviet Freudianism was established, how psychoanalysts were trained, what their research focused on, and the impact of their work. Although psychoanalysis underwent a withering ideological assault under Stalin and clinical activities were curtailed, discussions of Freud and his work continued. Later, as the end of the Soviet period approached, Freud`s writings were republished for the first time in decades, and psychoanalytic institutes and societies reemerged. Miller finds that the oscillations in Russian attitudes toward Freud during Soviet rule reflected shifting tensions within Russian culture at large.

作者简介

Martin A. Miller is professor of history at Duke University.

A selection of the History Book Club

用户评价

阅读《Freud and the Bolsheviks》的体验，就像是在一个古老而神秘的图书馆里，偶然发现一本被遗忘的手稿。书的装帧并不华丽，但散发出一种朴实而引人入胜的气质，仿佛在诉说着一段不为人知的故事。我一直对心理学和历史都抱有浓厚的兴趣，尤其是那些跨学科的探讨，总能带给我意想不到的启发。《Freud and the Bolsheviks》这个标题，恰恰触碰到了我内心深处的那种好奇。我想知道，精神分析的精妙理论，是如何与那个波澜壮阔的革命时代发生联系的？是弗洛伊德的思想，在当时的俄国社会激起了怎样的涟漪？还是说，革命的实践，反过来对弗洛伊德的理论提出了新的挑战和解读？我期待书中能够深入挖掘那些细腻的心理活动，展现个体在历史洪流中的挣扎与抉择，以及宏大的社会变革如何深刻地影响着个体的内心世界。这本书对我来说，不仅仅是了解历史或理论，更重要的是，它提供了一个独特的视角，去审视人类精神的复杂性，以及思想的力量是如何在现实世界中激荡起层层波纹的。

这本书的封面设计有一种奇特的吸引力，深邃的蓝色背景上，弗洛伊德的肖像若隐若现，与抽象的红色几何图形交织，似乎暗示着一场潜意识的革命。我拿到这本书时，就被这种视觉上的矛盾感深深吸引。我很好奇，精神分析的开创者，这位深入挖掘个体内心幽暗之处的心理学家，究竟会与那个激荡着集体意志、试图颠覆旧秩序的布尔什维克运动产生怎样的关联？是碰撞，是融合，还是某种出乎意料的张力？我迫不及待地想知道，作者是如何将这两个看似风马牛不相及的领域联系起来的。是关于弗洛伊德的思想如何被当时的俄国知识分子解读和接受，还是关于革命的宏大叙事如何映照出个体潜意识的挣扎？我尤其期待书中能够展现出不同历史语境下，人类心理与社会变革之间微妙而深刻的互动。这本书的标题本身就构成了一个引人入胜的谜题，它挑战了我们既有的认知框架，邀请我们去探索那些隐藏在历史洪流之下，不易被察觉的思想脉络。我希望这本书能够带我进入一个充满思辨和想象的空间，去理解那些塑造了我们所处世界的，看似遥远却又息息相关的力量。

《Freud and the Bolsheviks》这本书的书名，就像一个精心设计的谜题，立刻抓住了我的眼球。它将一位以探索个体内心世界著称的心理学巨匠，与一个旨在颠覆社会结构的政治运动并置，这种组合本身就充满了引人入胜的矛盾和张力。我对此书充满了期待，想象着作者将如何在这个看似毫不相干的领域之间搭建桥梁。究竟是弗洛伊德的理论如何影响了布尔什维克的思想，抑或是布尔什维克革命的实践，如何反过来为精神分析提供了新的研究素材？我渴望了解书中是否会深入剖析那个动荡年代的知识分子群体，他们是如何在新旧思想的洪流中挣扎，如何在宏大的历史进程中试图理解自身的欲望、恐惧和理想。我希望这本书能够以一种深刻而又富有洞察力的方式，揭示个体心理与社会变革之间错综复杂的关系，带领我走进一段非同寻常的思想史画卷。

当我翻开《Freud and the Bolsheviks》的扉页，一股历史的厚重感便扑面而来。这本书的气息，仿佛是尘封已久的书房里，混合着旧纸张、墨水和一丝不易察觉的革命气息。我并不是一个对历史事件了如指掌的人，但这个书名立刻勾起了我的好奇心，仿佛一把钥匙，能开启我通往一个我从未想象过的知识领域的门。我想象着，在那个风起云涌的年代，那些充满理想主义的革命者们，是否也曾试图从弗洛伊德的理论中寻找解释，或者，他们的行动是否无意识地印证了某些精神分析的洞见？我期待书中能够描绘出那个时代知识分子的精神图景，他们如何在新旧思想的交锋中摇摆，如何在宏大的政治变革中试图理解自身的内心世界。我希望这本书能够以一种生动而非枯燥的方式，将那些抽象的理论与鲜活的历史人物联系起来，让我能够更直观地感受到思想的碰撞是如何塑造历史的进程。对我而言，这本书不仅仅是一次阅读，更像是一次时空旅行，去探寻那些隐藏在历史表象之下的，人类精神深处的秘密。

当我初次邂逅《Freud and the Bolsheviks》这本书时，一种奇特而迷人的违和感油然而生。标题本身就充满了张力——一边是深入个体意识底层的心理学大师，另一边是席卷整个社会肌体的革命浪潮。我迫不及待地想知道，作者是如何巧妙地将这两者编织在一起的。是关于弗洛伊德的学说在革命时期的俄国是如何被接受、被误读、被利用的吗？还是说，那些革命者的激进行为，能否从精神分析的角度找到某种解释？我希望这本书能够像一位经验丰富的向导，带领我穿越历史的迷雾，去探索那些隐藏在表象之下的深层联系。我渴望了解，在那个充满理想与激情的年代，人们是如何在宏大的集体叙事和个人的内心世界之间寻求平衡的。这本书的标题，就好比是一扇通往未知世界的门，门后是怎样的风景，又隐藏着怎样的奥秘，都让我充满了无尽的遐想。我期待的，是一场思想的盛宴，一次对人性和历史的深刻洞察。

The point is, if i may say so, that the Freudian jungle has been such an echo of the great Russian writers like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky who had constructed an ideal-type of the troubled national psyche in the first place. Madness & Civilization, Mar 25, Summer 2010.

The point is, if i may say so, that the Freudian jungle has been such an echo of the great Russian writers like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky who had constructed an ideal-type of the troubled national psyche in the first place. Madness & Civilization, Mar 25, Summer 2010.

The point is, if i may say so, that the Freudian jungle has been such an echo of the great Russian writers like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky who had constructed an ideal-type of the troubled national psyche in the first place. Madness & Civilization, Mar 25, Summer 2010.

The point is, if i may say so, that the Freudian jungle has been such an echo of the great Russian writers like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky who had constructed an ideal-type of the troubled national psyche in the first place. Madness & Civilization, Mar 25, Summer 2010.

The point is, if i may say so, that the Freudian jungle has been such an echo of the great Russian writers like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky who had constructed an ideal-type of the troubled national psyche in the first place. Madness & Civilization, Mar 25, Summer 2010.