Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America

出版者:Longman

作者:Morris P. Fiorina

页数:296

出版时间:2010-1-24

价格:USD 34.20

装帧:Paperback

isbn号码:9780205779888

具体描述

Updated in a new 3rd edition and part of the"Great Questions in Politics" series, Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America combines polling data with a compelling narrative to debunk commonly-believed myths about American politics—particularly the claim that Americans are deeply divided in their fundamental political views.

Authored by one of the most respected political scientists in America, this brief, trade-like text looks at controversial and hot topic issues (such as homosexuality, abortion, etc.) and argues that most Americans are not polarized in relation to them.

目录信息

Preface to the Third Edition
Preface to the Second Edition
Preface to the First Edition
1. Culture War?
2. If America is not Polarized, Why Do So Many Americans Think it is?
3. A 50:50 Nation? Red and Blue State People are Not That Different.
4. A 50:50 Nation? Beyond the Red and the Blue States.
5. A Closer Look at Abortion.
6. A Closer Look at Homosexuality.
7. Have Electoral Cleavages Shifted?
8. The 2004 Election and Beyond.
9. Reconciling Micro and Macro.
10. How Did It Come to This and Where Do We Go From Here?
Epilogue. The Road to and from 2008
· · · · · · (收起)

读后感

On Nov 9th, Hillary Clinton gave her concession speech after a surprising loss to Donald Trump. She said "We have seen that our nation is more deeply divided than we thought". Is American people more divided now? It certainly appears so, as numerous polls s...

On Nov 9th, Hillary Clinton gave her concession speech after a surprising loss to Donald Trump. She said "We have seen that our nation is more deeply divided than we thought". Is American people more divided now? It certainly appears so, as numerous polls s...

On Nov 9th, Hillary Clinton gave her concession speech after a surprising loss to Donald Trump. She said "We have seen that our nation is more deeply divided than we thought". Is American people more divided now? It certainly appears so, as numerous polls s...

On Nov 9th, Hillary Clinton gave her concession speech after a surprising loss to Donald Trump. She said "We have seen that our nation is more deeply divided than we thought". Is American people more divided now? It certainly appears so, as numerous polls s...

On Nov 9th, Hillary Clinton gave her concession speech after a surprising loss to Donald Trump. She said "We have seen that our nation is more deeply divided than we thought". Is American people more divided now? It certainly appears so, as numerous polls s...

用户评价

这本书的行文风格可以说是相当的学术化，但又巧妙地避开了那种令人望而却步的晦涩。作者大量引用了社会学、政治学和历史学的经典理论框架，使得论证的基础无比坚实。我发现自己时不时会停下来，去查阅一下那些被提及但未详细展开的概念，这让我感觉自己不只是在被动地接收信息，而是在积极地参与一场知识的重构。尤其在分析某些文化冲突的根源时，它并没有停留在当代媒体的喧嚣之上，而是将时间线拉得很长，追溯到更深层次的社会变迁和经济基础的变化。这种历史纵深感，使得那些我们今天看来水火不容的阵营，其对立的逻辑变得可以理解，甚至在某种程度上是结构性的必然。对我个人而言，这种深入骨髓的解析，极大地缓解了我对于当前社会环境的一些焦虑，因为它告诉我，我们所见的“混乱”并非偶然，而是有迹可循的“秩序”的另一种表现形式。读完这部分，我感觉自己对“理解”这件事有了更深刻的体会。

这本书的封面设计简洁而有力，那种略带复古的字体排版，一下子就抓住了我的眼球。我通常对这种探讨社会宏大叙事的书籍抱有一种谨慎的期待，因为太多时候，它们最终沦为观点输出的平台，缺乏扎实的论据支撑。然而，这本书在开篇就展现出一种令人信服的冷静和细致入微的观察力。它不像那些情绪化的作品那样，上来就用耸人听闻的标题试图说服你。相反，作者似乎更倾向于像一个考古学家那样，一层层剥开表象，试图挖掘出那些被我们习以为常的“常识”背后的复杂结构。我特别欣赏它在处理一些敏感议题时所展现出的那种不偏不倚的态度。它不是在急于给你一个“是”或“否”的答案，而是不断地引导你去思考，去质疑那些看似坚不可摧的二元对立。阅读过程就像是在进行一次智力上的攀登，每翻过一页，都能感受到视野的拓展。这种行文的节奏感拿捏得恰到好处，既不至于让你感到沉闷，也不会因为信息量过大而让人应接不暇，让人忍不住想一口气读完，看看它究竟要把我们带向何方。

这本书的叙事逻辑如同精密的瑞士钟表，每一个齿轮——每一个论点、每一个案例——都严丝合缝地啮合在一起，推动着整体论述向前发展。最令我印象深刻的是，作者非常擅长运用反直觉的例子来打破读者的固有认知。它不会堆砌大量我们已经耳熟能详的政治口号或新闻片段，而是会深入到一些相对边缘但极具代表性的社区或群体中去，进行田野式的观察，然后将这些微观的叙事提炼升华，作为支撑宏大理论的有效证据。这种“由小及大”的论证手法，使得整本书读起来非常接地气，充满了生命力。它不像那些高高在上的理论著作，这本书仿佛在邀请你一同走进那些被标签化的角落，亲身感受那里人们的真实困境与诉求。我发现自己对那些我原本持保留意见的群体，产生了更多的同理心，不是因为这本书在为他们辩护，而是因为它清晰地展示了他们所处的“环境”，理解环境，才能真正理解行为。

这本书给我带来的最大收获，是重新审视了“两极化”这个词本身的定义。在很多流行语境中，这个词似乎已经变成了一个情绪化的标签，代表着不可调和的对立。但这本书却像一把手术刀，精准地剖开了这个概念的肌理，揭示了其背后可能存在的统计学误区、媒体放大效应以及结构性惰性。它没有否认社会中存在着显著的分歧和冲突，这一点是毋庸置疑的，但它挑战的是我们对这些冲突的**程度**和**性质**的理解。书中对于不同群体间信息获取渠道的差异化分析，让我茅塞顿开，明白了为什么双方似乎生活在同一个物理空间，却在认知上相距万里。它提供的不是简单的安慰剂，而是一种清醒的诊断书。读完后，我看待新闻报道和日常争论的视角都变得更加审慎和多维了，不再轻易地被简单的“红蓝”划分所束缚，转而开始寻找那些潜藏在对立表象之下的共同基础或潜在的融合点。这是一本真正能改变你看待世界方式的书。

从纯粹的阅读体验来看，这本书的语言组织有一种独特的韵律感，仿佛作者在每一个句子中都经过了深思熟虑，力求用最精准的词汇去描绘最复杂的社会现象。它的句子结构常常是长短句交替出现的，保证了阅读的流畅性，避免了长篇大论带来的疲惫感。而且，作者在引用数据和统计图表时，处理得非常高明，它们不是为了炫技而存在，而是像精准的定位标一样，帮助读者在复杂的论证链条中找到明确的参照点。我尤其欣赏它在总结观点时的那种克制和留白。它不会把话说得太满，总是在关键的转折处留出思考的空间，让读者自行去完成最后一步的逻辑推导。这种“邀请式”的写作风格，极大地增强了读者的参与感和代入感，让人感觉自己不是在被说服，而是在共同完成一次探索。这种精巧的文字功力，在严肃的非虚构作品中，是相当难得的。

What this book is about: those who think us Americans are so polarized that we are practically two nations under God are either exaggerating for their own interests or talking bullshit cuz we aren't. The end.

What this book is about: those who think us Americans are so polarized that we are practically two nations under God are either exaggerating for their own interests or talking bullshit cuz we aren't. The end.

政治就是bullshit

What this book is about: those who think us Americans are so polarized that we are practically two nations under God are either exaggerating for their own interests or talking bullshit cuz we aren't. The end.

What this book is about: those who think us Americans are so polarized that we are practically two nations under God are either exaggerating for their own interests or talking bullshit cuz we aren't. The end.