How might the pornographic be associated with Brecht’s and Benjamin’s media theories? How are Foucault’s and Deleuze’s writings on visibilities “postcolonial”? What happens when Rancière’s discussions of art are juxtaposed with cultural anthropology? What does a story by Lao She about collecting reveal about political collectivism in modern China? How does Girard’s notion of mimetic violence speak to identity politics? How might Arendt’s and Derrida’s reflections on forgiveness be supplemented by a film by Lee Chang-dong? What can Akira Kurosawa’s films about Japan say about American Studies? How is Asia framed transnationally, with what consequences for those who self-identify as Asian?
These questions are dispersively heterologous yet mutually implicated. This paradoxical character of their discursive relations is what Rey Chow intends with the word “entanglements,” by which she means, first, an enmeshment of topics: the mediatized image in modernist reflexivity; captivation and identification; victimhood; the place of East Asia in globalized Western academic study. Beyond enmeshment, she asks, can entanglements be phenomena that are not defined by affinity or proximity? Might entanglements be about partition and disparity rather than about conjunction and similarity?
Across medial forms (including theater, film, narrative, digitization, and photographic art), and against more popular trends of declaring things and people to be in flux, Chow proposes conceptual frames that foreground instead aesthetic, ontological, and sentient experiences of force, dominance, submission, fidelity, antagonism, masochism, letting-go, and the attraction to self-annihilation. Boundary, trap, capture, captivation, sacrifice, and mimesis: these riveting terms serve as analytic pressure points in her readings, articulating perversity, madness, and terror to pursuits of freedom.
發表於2024-12-29
Entanglements, or Transmedial Thinking about Capture 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: Rey_Chow 文化研究、哲學理論 論文集 暑假 實物 媒體 媒介研究 theory
很喜歡周蕾對後殖民對福柯的批評(歐洲中心主義)的反思,認為後殖民學者中的repressive-liberatory model對the visibility of the non-West的理解正是福柯的理論試圖problematize的。
評分語言簡單明快,引用夠豐富,例證雖是被常掛在嘴邊的例子,但另闢蹊徑從後殖民和全球化角度齣發,最後把色戒和第五代等量齊觀,被驚艷到。||第一次完整地讀完學術讀物吧,真丟人。
評分語言簡單明快,引用夠豐富,例證雖是被常掛在嘴邊的例子,但另闢蹊徑從後殖民和全球化角度齣發,最後把色戒和第五代等量齊觀,被驚艷到。||第一次完整地讀完學術讀物吧,真丟人。
評分很喜歡周蕾對後殖民對福柯的批評(歐洲中心主義)的反思,認為後殖民學者中的repressive-liberatory model對the visibility of the non-West的理解正是福柯的理論試圖problematize的。
評分語言簡單明快,引用夠豐富,例證雖是被常掛在嘴邊的例子,但另闢蹊徑從後殖民和全球化角度齣發,最後把色戒和第五代等量齊觀,被驚艷到。||第一次完整地讀完學術讀物吧,真丟人。
Entanglements, or Transmedial Thinking about Capture 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載