Karen Ferree is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at University of California, San Diego. She has traveled extensively in Africa, particularly South Africa. Her research focuses on elections in Africa's new and consolidating democracies, and she has published research articles in a variety of journals, including American Political Science Review, British Journal of Political Science, Journal of Politics, and Political Analysis.
Post-apartheid South African elections have borne an unmistakable racial imprint: Africans vote for one set of parties, whites support a different set of parties, and with few exceptions, there is no crossover voting between groups. These voting tendencies have solidified the dominance of the ruling African National Congress (ANC) over South African politics and turned South African elections into 'racial censuses'. This book explores the political sources of these outcomes. It argues that although the beginnings of these patterns lie in South Africa's past, in the effects apartheid had on voters' beliefs about race and destiny and the reputations parties forged during this period, the endurance of the census reflects the ruling party's ability to use the powers of office to prevent the opposition from evolving away from its apartheid-era party label.
像这种一党优位制下非法化反对党的研究从70年代开始就有了。大概是因为觉得这种建构主义的路径不容易找到系统性实证的证据?印象里这方面的文献一直比较迟滞。虽然这本书感觉也是まあまあ的感觉吧。不过能进Cambridge比较政治系列本身就是挺不错的。最开始还觉得,就这十几,二十年的时间段也还真敢写啊。。。嘛,人家Harvard的博士生就是这么腻害~~
评分像这种一党优位制下非法化反对党的研究从70年代开始就有了。大概是因为觉得这种建构主义的路径不容易找到系统性实证的证据?印象里这方面的文献一直比较迟滞。虽然这本书感觉也是まあまあ的感觉吧。不过能进Cambridge比较政治系列本身就是挺不错的。最开始还觉得,就这十几,二十年的时间段也还真敢写啊。。。嘛,人家Harvard的博士生就是这么腻害~~
评分像这种一党优位制下非法化反对党的研究从70年代开始就有了。大概是因为觉得这种建构主义的路径不容易找到系统性实证的证据?印象里这方面的文献一直比较迟滞。虽然这本书感觉也是まあまあ的感觉吧。不过能进Cambridge比较政治系列本身就是挺不错的。最开始还觉得,就这十几,二十年的时间段也还真敢写啊。。。嘛,人家Harvard的博士生就是这么腻害~~
评分像这种一党优位制下非法化反对党的研究从70年代开始就有了。大概是因为觉得这种建构主义的路径不容易找到系统性实证的证据?印象里这方面的文献一直比较迟滞。虽然这本书感觉也是まあまあ的感觉吧。不过能进Cambridge比较政治系列本身就是挺不错的。最开始还觉得,就这十几,二十年的时间段也还真敢写啊。。。嘛,人家Harvard的博士生就是这么腻害~~
评分像这种一党优位制下非法化反对党的研究从70年代开始就有了。大概是因为觉得这种建构主义的路径不容易找到系统性实证的证据?印象里这方面的文献一直比较迟滞。虽然这本书感觉也是まあまあ的感觉吧。不过能进Cambridge比较政治系列本身就是挺不错的。最开始还觉得,就这十几,二十年的时间段也还真敢写啊。。。嘛,人家Harvard的博士生就是这么腻害~~
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有