The Turn of the Screw

亨利•詹姆斯（Henry James,1843-1916），著名小说家、文艺评论家，心理分析小说的开创者。詹姆斯偏爱“国际小说”的题材，尤其擅长描写清白、丰富、民主的美国与古老、腐朽、堕落的欧洲之间的矛盾。他对人物的内心世界的刻画使他成为20世纪意识流运动的先驱。亨利•詹姆斯的创作生涯无疑是美国文学史上最长、最多产、最有影响的，他是19世纪至20世纪最伟大的散文作家与文体家之一，也被公认为运用小说艺术最巧妙的大师。

作者:James, Henry, Jr.

页数:172

价格:$ 14.63

isbn号码:9781592243112

图书标签:驚悚HenryJames20世纪

承接 住宅 自建房 室内改造 装修设计 免费咨询 QQ：624617358 一级注册建筑师 亲自为您回答、经验丰富，价格亲民。无论项目大小，都全力服务。期待合作，欢迎咨询！QQ：624617358

THE TURN OF THE SCREW is the greatest and most subtle of all English-language ghost stories. H.P. Lovecraft praised its "truly potent air of sinister menace" and "mounting tide of fright" and subsequent critics have argued long and hard over the central "problem" of the story: if the motifs of the traditional ghost story, in the hands of a master, are used to probe the deepest depths of the human psyche, do the resultant terrors spring from the objective return of the spirits of the dead, or from the fears, memories, and guilt the expectation of such apparitions may evoke? Are there any ghosts in this story at all? James himself might have been puzzled by that question. His own remarks make it clear that what he had in mind was a "sinister romance," inspired by a ghostly story he had heard from an Archbishop of Canterbury. He wrote of the "portentous evil" of the "demon-spirits" in the story, but it was his genius to make them so profoundly mysterious that THE TURN OF THE SCREW will survive any number of interpretations, and go on to chill and delight readers for centuries to come. THE TURN OF THE SCREW was memorably filmed as THE INNOCENTS (1961), arguably the finest cinematic ghost story of all time.

读后感

1、可能并没有鬼，女家庭教师精神有问题，鬼是她臆造的，证据之一就是其中一次她和小女孩，女管家同时在场的时候，身边两位都没有看到。女管家是个迷信心理很重的人，所以一听女家庭教师说见鬼了就附和也是有的。 2、女家庭教师和小男孩有暧昧吧？也许有实质性的性关系发生也...  

#读书.12月.05.113#2019年12月26日，在微信读书花了3小时17分钟看完了《螺丝在拧紧》。译文经典系列，但是我却很不喜欢这个译者的风格了，他为了模拟乡村女教师的那种古典的文字，结果搞得不伦不类的。而且阅读起来十分的不通畅，不知道詹姆斯同志的原文就是如此的不容易理解。...  

这是亨利詹姆斯的大作。 阅读过程几乎没有快感，但却是一本奇特的小说。它的奇特在于，给予了读者不同的阅读走向。 如，女家庭教师究竟有没有看到鬼？鬼魂是否只是出于她的想象？等等。这里很容易产生一些阴谋论的想法。 我不敢说完全看懂了，尤其是它的结局。讲故事的道格...  

用户评价

Too many adverbial modifiers, too much fussy meditation and ambiguous reflection and overdone clumsy suspenses. Don't see why it's among James' well-received works. I side with critics who consider the narrator insane...

Too many adverbial modifiers, too much fussy meditation and ambiguous reflection and overdone clumsy suspenses. Don't see why it's among James' well-received works. I side with critics who consider the narrator insane...

Too many adverbial modifiers, too much fussy meditation and ambiguous reflection and overdone clumsy suspenses. Don't see why it's among James' well-received works. I side with critics who consider the narrator insane...

Too many adverbial modifiers, too much fussy meditation and ambiguous reflection and overdone clumsy suspenses. Don't see why it's among James' well-received works. I side with critics who consider the narrator insane...

Too many adverbial modifiers, too much fussy meditation and ambiguous reflection and overdone clumsy suspenses. Don't see why it's among James' well-received works. I side with critics who consider the narrator insane...