发表于2024-12-27
The Path of the Law 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
图书标签: Law USA 法理学 法律 Harvard 法律原版 OliverHolmes 法学
Oliver Wendell Holmes served on the U S Supreme Court from 1902 to 1932. He is considered to be one of the most influential judges ever to serve on the court. His wit and concise writing style make his opinions some of the best-written documents to come out of the Supreme Court. Holmes considered law to be the barometer of our moral life. The history of law is also the history of man's moral development. The practice of law makes for better citizens and good men.
“我们学习法律,不是去研究一个秘密,而是去研讨一个众所周知的职业。” 1.基于预测论的法律实用主义与道德怀疑论 有用即真理的实践哲学投射于法律之中,形成霍姆斯的法律实用主义:法律研究的目的就是预测,即预测公共权力通过法院这一工具对人们影响的范围和程度;认识法律应当以坏人的目光,即分离道德的目光审视法律,不祈求某种公理,而只关注法院实际将做什么。 2.历史和社会利益决定了法律的内容与发展 霍姆斯并不是反逻辑的,但至少逻辑(尤其是形式主义法学的)并不是其解决疑难案件的方案;法官应当是填补孔隙的立法者,而非法律机器或用中立姿态伪装道德、政治立场。 任何一个时期的法律内容都大致与当时被认为适宜的条件相应;但是它的形式和机能及它达到理想结果的程度,则多半取决于历史。 3.法理学作为一种法律人的必备知识
评分1)the purpose of law is to make prediction thus better use 2) bad man assumption rather than internal moral disposition 3)written-fact based contract; rely on what has been said than meant4)development of law is logical but incalculable thus both certainty&repose r impossible5)history matters most relevant to the determination of present _now+here
评分短小精悍,揭开了法律的两层面纱:1.道德和法律混同的危害;2.逻辑演绎的谎言。既然法律背后是利益的博弈,那么不如好好思考啥目标是最平衡利益的,所以给出的方法也是功利主义的。霍姆斯果真是彻底的怀疑主义,批判法学派的祖师爷。但是为啥批判逻辑就不用逻辑论证了,说明一个道理全是举例子举例子...#2019.31
评分法律与逻辑之间的关系的始祖论证
评分1)the purpose of law is to make prediction thus better use 2) bad man assumption rather than internal moral disposition 3)written-fact based contract; rely on what has been said than meant4)development of law is logical but incalculable thus both certainty&repose r impossible5)history matters most relevant to the determination of present _now+here
The Path of the Law 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书