In this book, the noted intellectual historian Frank Ankersmit provides a systematic account of the problems of reference, truth, and meaning in historical writing. He works from the conviction that the historicist account of historical writing, associated primarily with Leopold von Ranke and Wilhelm von Humboldt, is essentially correct but that its original idealist and romanticist idiom needs to be translated into more modern terms. Rehabilitating historicism for the contemporary philosophy of history, he argues, "reveals the basic truths about the nature of the past itself, how we relate to it, and how we make sense of the past in historical writing."
At the heart of Ankersmit's project is a sharp distinction between interpretation and representation. The historical text, he holds, is first and foremost a representation of some part of the past, not an interpretation. The book's central chapters address the concept of historical representation from the perspectives of reference, truth, and meaning. Ankersmit then goes on to discuss the possible role of experience in the history writing, which leads directly to a consideration of subjectivity and ethics in the historian’s practice. Ankersmit concludes with a chapter on political history, which he maintains is the "basis and condition of all other variants of historical writing." Ankersmit’s rehabilitation of historicism is a powerfully original and provocative contribution to the debate about the nature of historical writing.
發表於2024-11-12
Meaning, Truth, and Reference in Historical Representation 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: 曆史 Ankersmit 理論 歷史編纂學 歷史學理論 歷史再現 新歷史主義 史學理論
很好,很清晰,很開闊,很剋製,很有啓發!沒想到在如今的狀況下,還有人擁有重建理論的氣魄和耐心。文史哲藝皆能各取所需,視野開闊而又不失深刻,長跪不止,五星奉上。
評分也算他的集大成作?極好極好,開闊而清晰,盤鏇在一些最基本的問題上。開篇直言自己站在蘭剋和洪堡的曆史主義一邊的,他們的Historical ideas的概念,一個時代/國傢的獨特性,曆史現象隻要在和其進行聯係時纔能被解釋,就像解釋人的行為會聯係到“性格”。但是和蘭剋們不一樣,他認為這種“觀念”不是內在於曆史本身,而在曆史學傢關於過去的言說裏。核心的再現理論,正如符號有denotation和connotation,他將再現也看作三重的,representation, represented reality和representation's presented,警告不能弄混後兩者的關係,涉及這樣的再現的真理性問題時,套海德格爾認為再現的真理就是現實在再現中嚮我們顯露的。
評分很好,很清晰,很開闊,很剋製,很有啓發!沒想到在如今的狀況下,還有人擁有重建理論的氣魄和耐心。文史哲藝皆能各取所需,視野開闊而又不失深刻,長跪不止,五星奉上。
評分很好,很清晰,很開闊,很剋製,很有啓發!沒想到在如今的狀況下,還有人擁有重建理論的氣魄和耐心。文史哲藝皆能各取所需,視野開闊而又不失深刻,長跪不止,五星奉上。
評分也算他的集大成作?極好極好,開闊而清晰,盤鏇在一些最基本的問題上。開篇直言自己站在蘭剋和洪堡的曆史主義一邊的,他們的Historical ideas的概念,一個時代/國傢的獨特性,曆史現象隻要在和其進行聯係時纔能被解釋,就像解釋人的行為會聯係到“性格”。但是和蘭剋們不一樣,他認為這種“觀念”不是內在於曆史本身,而在曆史學傢關於過去的言說裏。核心的再現理論,正如符號有denotation和connotation,他將再現也看作三重的,representation, represented reality和representation's presented,警告不能弄混後兩者的關係,涉及這樣的再現的真理性問題時,套海德格爾認為再現的真理就是現實在再現中嚮我們顯露的。
Meaning, Truth, and Reference in Historical Representation 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載