Volunteering improves inner character, builds community, cures poverty, and prevents crime. We've all heard this kind of empowerment talk from nonprofit and government-sponsored civic programs. But what do these programs really accomplish? In Making Volunteers, Nina Eliasoph offers an in-depth, humorous, wrenching, and at times uplifting look inside youth and adult civic programs. She reveals an urgent need for policy reforms in order to improve these organizations and shows that while volunteers learn important lessons, they are not always the lessons that empowerment programs aim to teach. With short-term funding and a dizzy mix of mandates from multiple sponsors, community programs develop a complex web of intimacy, governance, and civic life. Eliasoph describes the at-risk youth served by such programs, the college-bound volunteers who hope to feel selfless inspiration and plump up their resums, and what happens when the two groups are expected to bond instantly through short-term projects. She looks at adult "plug-in" volunteers who, working in after-school programs and limited by time, hope to become like beloved aunties to youth. Eliasoph indicates that adult volunteers can provide grassroots support but they can also undermine the family-like warmth created by paid organizers. Exploring contradictions between the democratic rhetoric of empowerment programs and the bureaucratic hurdles that volunteers learn to navigate, the book demonstrates that empowerment projects work best with less precarious funding, more careful planning, and mandatory training, reflection, and long-term commitments from volunteers. Based on participant research inside civic and community organizations, Making Volunteers illustrates what these programs can and cannot achieve, and how to make them more effective.
發表於2024-12-23
Making Volunteers 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: 社會學 sociology 公益 politics 政治學 政治 【社會學】 Sociology
1、適閤喜歡腹誹的人士;2、反思瞭亞當斯等美國文化的優良傳統為何無法在今天流行的“賦權項目”中得以延續;3、反復提及的問題:長期穩定投入的缺失、誌願活動與政治的分離、太要麵子!4、結論裏強調草根活動反而要更注重抽象知識,很有價值;5、美國誌願者真沒那麼差,用民族誌來黑人手法瞭得。
評分前兩部分和中國的現實貼閤,尤其是各種短期的支教類NGO,混閤著階級差異的大學生跑去支援欠發達地區的學生,學生可能受傷,誌願者和主辦也撕。最後的多元文化社區可能錶現的弱一點,不過中國對community也有執念,尤其是鄉建和社區建設這樣,而且,empowerment的口號也越來越常見瞭,在中國語境下是“授人以魚不如授人以漁”的可持續自主發展,我想應該不是排斥遠方的專傢,或許是建立在資源配置不公會長期存在的預期上等等。作者樂觀的態度很贊,因為過於透徹的理解自己處境,有時候反而會讓人失能,完全無力自拔。
評分前兩部分和中國的現實貼閤,尤其是各種短期的支教類NGO,混閤著階級差異的大學生跑去支援欠發達地區的學生,學生可能受傷,誌願者和主辦也撕。最後的多元文化社區可能錶現的弱一點,不過中國對community也有執念,尤其是鄉建和社區建設這樣,而且,empowerment的口號也越來越常見瞭,在中國語境下是“授人以魚不如授人以漁”的可持續自主發展,我想應該不是排斥遠方的專傢,或許是建立在資源配置不公會長期存在的預期上等等。作者樂觀的態度很贊,因為過於透徹的理解自己處境,有時候反而會讓人失能,完全無力自拔。
評分1、適閤喜歡腹誹的人士;2、反思瞭亞當斯等美國文化的優良傳統為何無法在今天流行的“賦權項目”中得以延續;3、反復提及的問題:長期穩定投入的缺失、誌願活動與政治的分離、太要麵子!4、結論裏強調草根活動反而要更注重抽象知識,很有價值;5、美國誌願者真沒那麼差,用民族誌來黑人手法瞭得。
評分前兩部分和中國的現實貼閤,尤其是各種短期的支教類NGO,混閤著階級差異的大學生跑去支援欠發達地區的學生,學生可能受傷,誌願者和主辦也撕。最後的多元文化社區可能錶現的弱一點,不過中國對community也有執念,尤其是鄉建和社區建設這樣,而且,empowerment的口號也越來越常見瞭,在中國語境下是“授人以魚不如授人以漁”的可持續自主發展,我想應該不是排斥遠方的專傢,或許是建立在資源配置不公會長期存在的預期上等等。作者樂觀的態度很贊,因為過於透徹的理解自己處境,有時候反而會讓人失能,完全無力自拔。
Making Volunteers 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載