Dr. Stanley Milgram (August 15, 1933 – December 20, 1984) was a social psychologist at Yale University, Harvard University and the City University of New York. While at Harvard, he conducted the small-world experiment (the source of the six degrees of separation concept), and while at Yale, he conducted the Milgram experiment on obedience to authority. He also introduced the concept of familiar strangers.
The Milgram experiment was a series of seminal social psychology experiments conducted by Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram, which measured the willingness of study participants to obey an authority figure who instructed them to perform acts that conflicted with their personal conscience. Milgram first described his research in 1963 in an article published in the Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,and later discussed his findings in greater depth in his 1974 book, Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View.
The experiments began in July 1961, three months after the start of the trial of Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann in Jerusalem. Milgram devised the experiments to answer this question: "Could it be that Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders? Could we call them all accomplices?"
在瞭解自己之後,我對人”性本善“是持懷疑態度的,因為很多時候自己的想法和行為都在暴露齣你不是一個好人,雖然沒有做齣什麼傷天害理的行為,但以小窺大,從0到1的跨越其實並不是特彆睏難,在沒有知道“艾希曼”這個名字和”米爾格拉姆實驗“,”斯坦福監獄實驗“之前,我也...
評分讀完瞭,發現在人性中有許多我們未曾注意卻深深影響我們一生的東西,比如,順從,追求自由等,米爾格拉姆的實驗讓普通人站在瞭天平的中間,一邊是順從權威,遵守紀律,一邊是保護彆人,自我犧牲。本來兩方麵都是互不衝突的美好品性,但是通過實驗的設置,使得矛盾齣現,天平不...
評分後麵的介紹是從從維基上扒過來的,看瞭一遍,很多是從書上翻譯的,大體準確。 在學校圖書館裏還有很老的黑白紀錄片,就是他們當時拍攝的,看得真是毛骨悚然。實驗者身強體壯,明明心中緊張萬分,卻還要故作鎮定的按下按鈕,不停的迴望白大褂的實驗員,實驗員隻是幾句冷冰冰的“...
評分1.納粹劊子手在公審時為自己大屠殺猶太人辯護:執行上級命令無罪。 2.這引發瞭作者思考:上級下達的命令是傷天害理的反人道的,應該服從嗎?正常人在權威指示下,會做齣什麼程度的惡行?道德和良知能否抵抗權威的指令? 3.作者設計瞭這樣的實驗:對外宣稱,研究體罰是否可以提...
執手相看淚眼。
评分Can human nature be changed in such a way that man will forget his longing for freedom, for dignity, for integrity, for love—that is to say, can man forget he is human? Or does human nature have a dynamism which will react to the violation of these basic human needs by attempting to change an inhuman society into a human one?
评分Can human nature be changed in such a way that man will forget his longing for freedom, for dignity, for integrity, for love—that is to say, can man forget he is human? Or does human nature have a dynamism which will react to the violation of these basic human needs by attempting to change an inhuman society into a human one?
评分第一次一天讀完一本英文書,也是讀過最負能量的一本書。我個人更傾嚮於服從是個人道德感中的個體層麵讓步於集體層麵的一個例子。從進化的觀念講,這種群體道德感也是有利於群體延續的。下一步應該思考的是權威的服從者應該承擔多少責任?另外,我不太認同作者的實驗倫理。他認為這種情感壓力是被者的個人選擇的結果,而我認為這種壓力恰恰在於被試者需要做齣選擇本身。真是既無beneficiary也無consentment。
评分執手相看淚眼。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有