Manufacturing Consent

Edward S. Herman is Professor Emeritus of Finance at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.Noam Chomsky is Professor, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

出版者:Pantheon

作者:Edward S. Herman

页数:480

出版时间:2002-1-15

价格:USD 19.95

装帧:Paperback

isbn号码:9780375714498

图书标签:Chomsky传播美国媒体政治NoamHerman思维

承接 住宅 自建房 室内改造 装修设计 免费咨询 QQ：624617358 一级注册建筑师 亲自为您回答、经验丰富，价格亲民。无论项目大小，都全力服务。期待合作，欢迎咨询！QQ：624617358

In this pathbreaking work, now with a new introduction, Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky show that, contrary to the usual image of the news media as cantankerous, obstinate, and ubiquitous in their search for truth and defense of justice, in their actual practice they defend the economic, social, and political agendas of the privileged groups that dominate domestic society, the state, and the global order.

Based on a series of case studies—including the media’s dichotomous treatment of “worthy” versus “unworthy” victims, “legitimizing” and “meaningless” Third World elections, and devastating critiques of media coverage of the U.S. wars against Indochina—Herman and Chomsky draw on decades of criticism and research to propose a Propaganda Model to explain the media’s behavior and performance. Their new introduction updates the Propaganda Model and the earlier case studies, and it discusses several other applications. These include the manner in which the media covered the passage of the North American Free Trade Agreement and subsequent Mexican financial meltdown of 1994-1995, the media’s handling of the protests against the World Trade Organization, World Bank, and International Monetary Fund in 1999 and 2000, and the media’s treatment of the chemical industry and its regulation. What emerges from this work is a powerful assessment of how propagandistic the U.S. mass media are, how they systematically fail to live up to their self-image as providers of the kind of information that people need to make sense of the world, and how we can understand their function in a radically new way.

读后感

不同于早期的施拉姆(Schramm)式的御用文人大肆抨击苏联共产主义媒体制度的缺陷，也不同于哈林和曼奇尼（Hallin and Mancini)将polarised pluralist model视为至差的媒体类型，赫尔曼和乔姆斯基将矛头指向了美国这个世界上言论最自由的国家（乔姆斯基语）。 如果你对乔姆斯基...

不同于早期的施拉姆(Schramm)式的御用文人大肆抨击苏联共产主义媒体制度的缺陷，也不同于哈林和曼奇尼（Hallin and Mancini)将polarised pluralist model视为至差的媒体类型，赫尔曼和乔姆斯基将矛头指向了美国这个世界上言论最自由的国家（乔姆斯基语）。 如果你对乔姆斯基...

不同于早期的施拉姆(Schramm)式的御用文人大肆抨击苏联共产主义媒体制度的缺陷，也不同于哈林和曼奇尼（Hallin and Mancini)将polarised pluralist model视为至差的媒体类型，赫尔曼和乔姆斯基将矛头指向了美国这个世界上言论最自由的国家（乔姆斯基语）。 如果你对乔姆斯基...

不同于早期的施拉姆(Schramm)式的御用文人大肆抨击苏联共产主义媒体制度的缺陷，也不同于哈林和曼奇尼（Hallin and Mancini)将polarised pluralist model视为至差的媒体类型，赫尔曼和乔姆斯基将矛头指向了美国这个世界上言论最自由的国家（乔姆斯基语）。 如果你对乔姆斯基...

不同于早期的施拉姆(Schramm)式的御用文人大肆抨击苏联共产主义媒体制度的缺陷，也不同于哈林和曼奇尼（Hallin and Mancini)将polarised pluralist model视为至差的媒体类型，赫尔曼和乔姆斯基将矛头指向了美国这个世界上言论最自由的国家（乔姆斯基语）。 如果你对乔姆斯基...

用户评价

Chomsky打开了新世界的大门，自由言论国家的自我反思。

2.16-2.29 | wanna say the media is only as good as the people it serves but then it begs the question who is responsible of educating the people and who is guilty of manipulating our minds

This is when I realized every media is controlled by parties with mutual interests.

Intro + Chap 1 + Conclusion. Propaganda Model (5 filters): ownership, information-dependency, advertisement, flak, anti-communism. 分析框架不错，但并不方便照搬，该模型批判的是二战后尤其是越战时期的美国媒体，或许老乔可以写一部后9·11时期的宣传模型？

2.16-2.29 | wanna say the media is only as good as the people it serves but then it begs the question who is responsible of educating the people and who is guilty of manipulating our minds