"The Fate of Reason" is the first general history devoted to the period between Kant and Fichte, one of the most revolutionary and fertile in modern philosophy. The philosophers of this time broke with the two central tenets of the modem Cartesian tradition: the authority of reason and the primacy of epistemology. They also witnessed the decline of the Aufkldrung, the completion of Kant's philosophy, and the beginnings of post-Kantian idealism. Thanks to Beiser we can newly appreciate the influence of Kant's critics on the development of his philosophy. Beiser brings the controversies, and the personalities who engaged in them, to life and tells a story that has uncanny parallels with the debates of the present.
具體描述
讀後感
用戶評價
Kant, Hamann:Kant, Hamann, and the Optimism Controversy and Aesthetica in nuce and Eighteenth-Century Aesthetics;Jacobi:Jacobi's First Critique of Reason and Jacobi's Second Critique of Reason
评分康德認為Jacobi是enthusiasm，而Jacobi其實比門德爾鬆更為理性，也是理性將他帶到speculative reason的邊界，在那裏若要前進隻能訴諸final cause，在這一點上Jacobi深刻地理解瞭康德；不過Jacobi能夠承認斯賓諾莎的洞見，康德卻沒能迴應Jacobi對他的質疑，估計他也沒認真讀Jacobi關於他的章節0.0，隻在實踐哲學中進行瞭規定；萊辛是最美好的，坦率而且堅定；可見Spinozism在當時多麼誘人。
评分Kant, Hamann:Kant, Hamann, and the Optimism Controversy and Aesthetica in nuce and Eighteenth-Century Aesthetics;Jacobi:Jacobi's First Critique of Reason and Jacobi's Second Critique of Reason
评分研究泛神論爭論和費希特之前的康德評論最好的一本書瞭。導言和雅可比那一章清晰有力。但到門德爾鬆這章令人失望，比如對康德的批判這段評論是不公正的，對他的泛神論解讀也沒有給予充分的重視。總的來說，看看國內研究的空白，這絕對是論文灌水大殺器！
评分研究泛神論爭論和費希特之前的康德評論最好的一本書瞭。導言和雅可比那一章清晰有力。但到門德爾鬆這章令人失望，比如對康德的批判這段評論是不公正的，對他的泛神論解讀也沒有給予充分的重視。總的來說，看看國內研究的空白，這絕對是論文灌水大殺器！
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有