Quentin Skinner is Regius Professor of Modern History in the University of Cambridge and a Fellow of Christ's College.
The first of three volumes of essays by Quentin Skinner, one of the world's leading intellectual historians. This collection includes some of his most important philosophical and methodological statements written over the past four decades, each carefully revised for publication in this form. In a series of seminal essays Professor Skinner sets forth the intellectual principles that inform his work. Writing as a practising historian, he considers the theoretical difficulties inherent in the pursuit of knowledge and interpretation, and elucidates the methodology which finds its expression in his two successive volumes. All of Professor Skinner's work is characterised by philosophical power, limpid clarity, and elegance of exposition; these essays, many of which are now recognised classics, provide a fascinating and convenient digest of the development of his thought. Professor Skinner has been awarded the Balzan Prize Life Time Achievement Award for Political Thought, History and Theory. Full details of this award can be found at http://www.balzan.it/News_eng.aspx?ID=2474
發表於2025-03-23
Visions of Politics (Volume 1) 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
斯金納這本關於方法論的書,我關注兩個主題。 一, 社會意義和對社會行為的解釋 我過去理解的韋伯和塗爾乾之爭,斯金納將其解釋為anti-naturalists對naturalists。韋伯的Verstehen或塗爾乾的positivism,爭論主要在社會科學領域。斯金納是曆史學傢,在曆史哲學中,也存在狄爾...
評分斯金納這本關於方法論的書,我關注兩個主題。 一, 社會意義和對社會行為的解釋 我過去理解的韋伯和塗爾乾之爭,斯金納將其解釋為anti-naturalists對naturalists。韋伯的Verstehen或塗爾乾的positivism,爭論主要在社會科學領域。斯金納是曆史學傢,在曆史哲學中,也存在狄爾...
評分斯金納這本關於方法論的書,我關注兩個主題。 一, 社會意義和對社會行為的解釋 我過去理解的韋伯和塗爾乾之爭,斯金納將其解釋為anti-naturalists對naturalists。韋伯的Verstehen或塗爾乾的positivism,爭論主要在社會科學領域。斯金納是曆史學傢,在曆史哲學中,也存在狄爾...
評分斯金納這本關於方法論的書,我關注兩個主題。 一, 社會意義和對社會行為的解釋 我過去理解的韋伯和塗爾乾之爭,斯金納將其解釋為anti-naturalists對naturalists。韋伯的Verstehen或塗爾乾的positivism,爭論主要在社會科學領域。斯金納是曆史學傢,在曆史哲學中,也存在狄爾...
評分斯金納這本關於方法論的書,我關注兩個主題。 一, 社會意義和對社會行為的解釋 我過去理解的韋伯和塗爾乾之爭,斯金納將其解釋為anti-naturalists對naturalists。韋伯的Verstehen或塗爾乾的positivism,爭論主要在社會科學領域。斯金納是曆史學傢,在曆史哲學中,也存在狄爾...
圖書標籤: 劍橋學派 政治思想史 政治哲學 Quentin_Skinner 斯金納 方法論 思想史 政治學
寫法略嫌重復,四和八精彩。基於contextualization、speech act以及更廣義的語言學/修辭學討論的方法論一種。斯金納健筆如椽,條分縷析的功夫、尤其是辨析他人多有所混淆的地方非常厲害。Intro結尾太有力,簡直是對語言、甚至對書寫最深情的告白。"The plea is to recognise that the pen is a mighty sword...We may be freer than we sometimes suppose."至於某個朝令夕改的國度,大約充斥著“paradiastolic redescription”吧。
評分This is a must-read for those who are interested in how to do intellectual history. Skinner explains what his historical contexualism is. He propounded an interesting explanation on the difference between intention and motivation. Intention is what one has in his/her mind when one does something. Motivation is the preceding event.
評分寫法略嫌重復,四和八精彩。基於contextualization、speech act以及更廣義的語言學/修辭學討論的方法論一種。斯金納健筆如椽,條分縷析的功夫、尤其是辨析他人多有所混淆的地方非常厲害。Intro結尾太有力,簡直是對語言、甚至對書寫最深情的告白。"The plea is to recognise that the pen is a mighty sword...We may be freer than we sometimes suppose."至於某個朝令夕改的國度,大約充斥著“paradiastolic redescription”吧。
評分《政治學視域:方法篇》乃選輯斯大師有關思想史研究的精華之作,劍橋學派思想的能從幾篇典型的論文中找到原型,如《思想史研究的意蘊與理解》、《動機、意圖、及闡釋》等,文章結構清晰易懂,所要錶達的內容也能從作者所舉的現實例子中得到理解;其次,大師成文方法也很值得後輩學習,即文章通過與之思想相異者進行再辯論而成,從對方的觀點入手,提齣異議,進而提齣自己的觀點再加以論證最後總結厚實觀點;有些文章讀之,還有些無厘頭之感,但為瞭錶達他的意圖與動機,搬齣馬基雅維利或霍布斯作為擋箭也為嘗不可,這也算是一種成文的方法。本書對思想史晚輩的寫作、思考、邏輯性的培養具有很好的指導及方嚮性意義;文字樸素,錶達靈活,觀點鮮明乃本書一大特色,不愧是大師之作。
評分10.3 1-7 27-144 “Seeing things their Way”, “Interpretation, Rationality, and Truth”, “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas”
Visions of Politics (Volume 1) 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載