Quentin Skinner is Regius Professor of Modern History in the University of Cambridge and a Fellow of Christ's College.
The first of three volumes of essays by Quentin Skinner, one of the world's leading intellectual historians. This collection includes some of his most important philosophical and methodological statements written over the past four decades, each carefully revised for publication in this form. In a series of seminal essays Professor Skinner sets forth the intellectual principles that inform his work. Writing as a practising historian, he considers the theoretical difficulties inherent in the pursuit of knowledge and interpretation, and elucidates the methodology which finds its expression in his two successive volumes. All of Professor Skinner's work is characterised by philosophical power, limpid clarity, and elegance of exposition; these essays, many of which are now recognised classics, provide a fascinating and convenient digest of the development of his thought. Professor Skinner has been awarded the Balzan Prize Life Time Achievement Award for Political Thought, History and Theory. Full details of this award can be found at http://www.balzan.it/News_eng.aspx?ID=2474
斯金納這本關於方法論的書,我關注兩個主題。 一, 社會意義和對社會行為的解釋 我過去理解的韋伯和塗爾乾之爭,斯金納將其解釋為anti-naturalists對naturalists。韋伯的Verstehen或塗爾乾的positivism,爭論主要在社會科學領域。斯金納是曆史學傢,在曆史哲學中,也存在狄爾...
評分斯金納這本關於方法論的書,我關注兩個主題。 一, 社會意義和對社會行為的解釋 我過去理解的韋伯和塗爾乾之爭,斯金納將其解釋為anti-naturalists對naturalists。韋伯的Verstehen或塗爾乾的positivism,爭論主要在社會科學領域。斯金納是曆史學傢,在曆史哲學中,也存在狄爾...
評分斯金納這本關於方法論的書,我關注兩個主題。 一, 社會意義和對社會行為的解釋 我過去理解的韋伯和塗爾乾之爭,斯金納將其解釋為anti-naturalists對naturalists。韋伯的Verstehen或塗爾乾的positivism,爭論主要在社會科學領域。斯金納是曆史學傢,在曆史哲學中,也存在狄爾...
評分斯金納這本關於方法論的書,我關注兩個主題。 一, 社會意義和對社會行為的解釋 我過去理解的韋伯和塗爾乾之爭,斯金納將其解釋為anti-naturalists對naturalists。韋伯的Verstehen或塗爾乾的positivism,爭論主要在社會科學領域。斯金納是曆史學傢,在曆史哲學中,也存在狄爾...
評分斯金納這本關於方法論的書,我關注兩個主題。 一, 社會意義和對社會行為的解釋 我過去理解的韋伯和塗爾乾之爭,斯金納將其解釋為anti-naturalists對naturalists。韋伯的Verstehen或塗爾乾的positivism,爭論主要在社會科學領域。斯金納是曆史學傢,在曆史哲學中,也存在狄爾...
This is a must-read for those who are interested in how to do intellectual history. Skinner explains what his historical contexualism is. He propounded an interesting explanation on the difference between intention and motivation. Intention is what one has in his/her mind when one does something. Motivation is the preceding event.
评分寫法略嫌重復,四和八精彩。基於contextualization、speech act以及更廣義的語言學/修辭學討論的方法論一種。斯金納健筆如椽,條分縷析的功夫、尤其是辨析他人多有所混淆的地方非常厲害。Intro結尾太有力,簡直是對語言、甚至對書寫最深情的告白。"The plea is to recognise that the pen is a mighty sword...We may be freer than we sometimes suppose."至於某個朝令夕改的國度,大約充斥著“paradiastolic redescription”吧。
评分Quentin Skinner, “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas”, History and Theory;57-89 (二十餘歲發錶)
评分10.3 1-7 27-144 “Seeing things their Way”, “Interpretation, Rationality, and Truth”, “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas”
评分pdf 方法論神作,打算再補充點日常語言哲學知識再讀。我讀完瞭,實在喜歡,
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有