Visions of Politics (Vol. III) pdf epub mobi txt 電子書下載2025

簡體網頁||繁體網頁

☆☆☆☆☆

Quentin Skinner is Regius Professor of Modern History in the University of Cambridge and a Fellow of Christ's College.

出版者:Cambridge University Press

作者:Quentin Skinner

出品人:

頁數:404

译者:

出版時間:2002-09-16

價格:USD 29.99

裝幀:Paperback

isbn號碼:9780521890601

叢書系列:

圖書標籤:

思想史
劍橋學派
Quentin_Skinner
政治哲學
霍布斯
英文原版
英文
英國

下載連結在頁面底部

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 複製連結

想要找書就要到本本書屋

onlinetoolsland.com

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁

你會得到大驚喜!!

The third of three volumes of essays by Quentin Skinner, one of the world's leading intellectual historians. This collection includes some of his most important essays on Thomas Hobbes, each of which has been carefully revised for publication in this form. In a series of writings spanning the past four decades Professor Skinner examines, with his customary perspicuity, the evolution and character of Hobbes's political thought. An indispensable work in its own right, this volume also serves as a demonstration of those methodological theories propounded in Volume I, and as an appositional commentary on the Renaissance values of civic virtue treated in Volume II. All of Professor Skinner's work is characterised by philosophical power, limpid clarity, and elegance of exposition; these essays, many of which are now recognised classics, provide a fascinating and convenient digest of the development of his thought. Professer Skinner has been awarded the Balzan Prize Life Time Achievement Award for Political Thought, History and Theory. Full details of this award can be found at http://www.balzan.it/News_eng.aspx?ID=2474

具體描述

讀後感

評分☆☆☆☆☆

斯金納這本關於方法論的書，我關注兩個主題。一，社會意義和對社會行為的解釋我過去理解的韋伯和塗爾乾之爭，斯金納將其解釋為anti-naturalists對naturalists。韋伯的Verstehen或塗爾乾的positivism，爭論主要在社會科學領域。斯金納是曆史學傢，在曆史哲學中，也存在狄爾...

評分☆☆☆☆☆

用戶評價

评分☆☆☆☆☆

就讀瞭第三捲（霍布斯那捲）。發現很多國內“學者”都是照抄此書。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

就讀瞭第三捲（霍布斯那捲）。發現很多國內“學者”都是照抄此書。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

“我也想寫成這樣”

评分☆☆☆☆☆

讀瞭可能需要用到幾篇論文，斯金納的功底自不必說，哲學深度和曆史視野兼具，文本分析方麵相當有啓發性，不過也有很大的拓展空間。最後一篇論文將霍布斯歸類為de facto派，就個人的閱讀來看倒不能說錯，在政治學方麵確實有這樣的體會，但是問題在於斯金納忽視霍布斯的宗教批判是否閤適，如果關注到這部分內容，可能會發現霍布斯並不是de facto派那麼簡單，他的野心其實更大，不過對霍布斯的思想定位還是挺高的。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

就讀瞭第三捲（霍布斯那捲）。發現很多國內“學者”都是照抄此書。