Quentin Skinner is Regius Professor of Modern History in the University of Cambridge and a Fellow of Christ's College.
The third of three volumes of essays by Quentin Skinner, one of the world's leading intellectual historians. This collection includes some of his most important essays on Thomas Hobbes, each of which has been carefully revised for publication in this form. In a series of writings spanning the past four decades Professor Skinner examines, with his customary perspicuity, the evolution and character of Hobbes's political thought. An indispensable work in its own right, this volume also serves as a demonstration of those methodological theories propounded in Volume I, and as an appositional commentary on the Renaissance values of civic virtue treated in Volume II. All of Professor Skinner's work is characterised by philosophical power, limpid clarity, and elegance of exposition; these essays, many of which are now recognised classics, provide a fascinating and convenient digest of the development of his thought. Professer Skinner has been awarded the Balzan Prize Life Time Achievement Award for Political Thought, History and Theory. Full details of this award can be found at http://www.balzan.it/News_eng.aspx?ID=2474
發表於2024-11-22
Visions of Politics (Vol. III) 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
斯金納這本關於方法論的書,我關注兩個主題。 一, 社會意義和對社會行為的解釋 我過去理解的韋伯和塗爾乾之爭,斯金納將其解釋為anti-naturalists對naturalists。韋伯的Verstehen或塗爾乾的positivism,爭論主要在社會科學領域。斯金納是曆史學傢,在曆史哲學中,也存在狄爾...
評分斯金納這本關於方法論的書,我關注兩個主題。 一, 社會意義和對社會行為的解釋 我過去理解的韋伯和塗爾乾之爭,斯金納將其解釋為anti-naturalists對naturalists。韋伯的Verstehen或塗爾乾的positivism,爭論主要在社會科學領域。斯金納是曆史學傢,在曆史哲學中,也存在狄爾...
評分斯金納這本關於方法論的書,我關注兩個主題。 一, 社會意義和對社會行為的解釋 我過去理解的韋伯和塗爾乾之爭,斯金納將其解釋為anti-naturalists對naturalists。韋伯的Verstehen或塗爾乾的positivism,爭論主要在社會科學領域。斯金納是曆史學傢,在曆史哲學中,也存在狄爾...
評分斯金納這本關於方法論的書,我關注兩個主題。 一, 社會意義和對社會行為的解釋 我過去理解的韋伯和塗爾乾之爭,斯金納將其解釋為anti-naturalists對naturalists。韋伯的Verstehen或塗爾乾的positivism,爭論主要在社會科學領域。斯金納是曆史學傢,在曆史哲學中,也存在狄爾...
評分斯金納這本關於方法論的書,我關注兩個主題。 一, 社會意義和對社會行為的解釋 我過去理解的韋伯和塗爾乾之爭,斯金納將其解釋為anti-naturalists對naturalists。韋伯的Verstehen或塗爾乾的positivism,爭論主要在社會科學領域。斯金納是曆史學傢,在曆史哲學中,也存在狄爾...
圖書標籤: 思想史 劍橋學派 Quentin_Skinner 政治哲學 霍布斯 英文原版 英文 英國
“我也想寫成這樣”
評分就讀瞭第三捲(霍布斯那捲)。發現很多國內“學者”都是照抄此書。
評分就讀瞭第三捲(霍布斯那捲)。發現很多國內“學者”都是照抄此書。
評分讀瞭可能需要用到幾篇論文,斯金納的功底自不必說,哲學深度和曆史視野兼具,文本分析方麵相當有啓發性,不過也有很大的拓展空間。最後一篇論文將霍布斯歸類為de facto派,就個人的閱讀來看倒不能說錯,在政治學方麵確實有這樣的體會,但是問題在於斯金納忽視霍布斯的宗教批判是否閤適,如果關注到這部分內容,可能會發現霍布斯並不是de facto派那麼簡單,他的野心其實更大,不過對霍布斯的思想定位還是挺高的。
評分前半本書基本是炒reason and rheteric的冷飯,第七章基本是republican liberty,後半本書討論英國內戰後的意識形態背景,多少還算有點意思。搞笑的是,斯金納自己最後得齣結論說,霍布斯的貢獻不在於他的立場,而在於他基於自然人性來論證這個立場,完全摒棄瞭神意論證的方式,然後,就沒有然後瞭……把霍布斯歸於de fecto派,未免太小看他瞭。
Visions of Politics (Vol. III) 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載