发表于2024-11-19
Justice in Robes 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
算不上书评。该说的实证主义者们在批评《法律帝国》时已经说够了。一句话就是,哪怕针对莱特等人的自然种类法哲学扩展了语义学之刺的论域,仍然没有改变语义学之刺根本上的谬误之处。 书店今天刚开始铺货。事前翻译了一篇米歇尔.斯蒂芬.格林对此书的回应,试着校对了引文里的...
评分《身披法袍的正义》一书买来,看了有看得出的结论就是:可能是个人水品有限,个人觉得翻译的不好,象一段话上谷歌翻译,自己改了改的样子~~晦涩难懂,不推荐买。但从另一方面,本书也是治疗睡眠的特效药如果你睡眠不好,建议赶紧入手。
评分算不上书评。该说的实证主义者们在批评《法律帝国》时已经说够了。一句话就是,哪怕针对莱特等人的自然种类法哲学扩展了语义学之刺的论域,仍然没有改变语义学之刺根本上的谬误之处。 书店今天刚开始铺货。事前翻译了一篇米歇尔.斯蒂芬.格林对此书的回应,试着校对了引文里的...
评分《身披法袍的正义》一书买来,看了有看得出的结论就是:可能是个人水品有限,个人觉得翻译的不好,象一段话上谷歌翻译,自己改了改的样子~~晦涩难懂,不推荐买。但从另一方面,本书也是治疗睡眠的特效药如果你睡眠不好,建议赶紧入手。
评分算不上书评。该说的实证主义者们在批评《法律帝国》时已经说够了。一句话就是,哪怕针对莱特等人的自然种类法哲学扩展了语义学之刺的论域,仍然没有改变语义学之刺根本上的谬误之处。 书店今天刚开始铺货。事前翻译了一篇米歇尔.斯蒂芬.格林对此书的回应,试着校对了引文里的...
图书标签: Dworkin 法哲学 自然法 法理 法律 法学 Ronald_Dworkin 美国
How should a judge's moral convictions bear on his judgments about what the law is? Lawyers, sociologists, philosophers, politicians, and judges all have answers to that question: these range from "nothing" to "everything." In his new book Ronald Dworkin argues that the question is much more complex than it has often been taken to be and charts a variety of dimensions--semantic, jurisprudential, and doctrinal--in which law and morals are undoubtedly interwoven. He restates and summarizes his own widely discussed account of these connections, which emphasizes the sovereign importance of moral principle in legal and constitutional interpretation, and then reviews and criticizes the most influential rival theories to his own. He argues that pragmatism is empty as a theory of law, that value pluralism misunderstands the nature of moral concepts, that constitutional originalism reflects an impoverished view of the role of a constitution in a democratic society, and that contemporary legal positivism is based on a mistaken semantic theory and an erroneous account of the nature of authority. In the course of that critical study he discusses the work of many of the most influential lawyers and philosophers of the era, including Isaiah Berlin, Richard Posner, Cass Sunstein, Antonin Scalia, and Joseph Raz. Dworkin's new collection of essays and original chapters is a model of lucid, logical, and impassioned reasoning that will advance the crucially important debate about the roles of justice in law. </p>
导言、哈特后记、三十年来、法律概念以及罗尔斯等篇澄清了埋藏在诸多讨论中德沃金不易被把握的论点。整全性在导言中被具体化为合法性,柔性实证主义被判为背离初衷与不切题。隐约闪现既不认同形而上学又不认同怀疑论的融贯论真理观,通往刺猬正义第一部分。
评分clearly, Dworkin is in a discourse w/ a bunch of hard-core legal philosophers here. he knows for sure that he can get credits and critics on this position, which is why he has fabricated a systematic starter as an index. as for the left part, it's a suffer.
评分clearly, Dworkin is in a discourse w/ a bunch of hard-core legal philosophers here. he knows for sure that he can get credits and critics on this position, which is why he has fabricated a systematic starter as an index. as for the left part, it's a suffer.
评分clearly, Dworkin is in a discourse w/ a bunch of hard-core legal philosophers here. he knows for sure that he can get credits and critics on this position, which is why he has fabricated a systematic starter as an index. as for the left part, it's a suffer.
评分导言、哈特后记、三十年来、法律概念以及罗尔斯等篇澄清了埋藏在诸多讨论中德沃金不易被把握的论点。整全性在导言中被具体化为合法性,柔性实证主义被判为背离初衷与不切题。隐约闪现既不认同形而上学又不认同怀疑论的融贯论真理观,通往刺猬正义第一部分。
Justice in Robes 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书