How should a judge's moral convictions bear on his judgments about what the law is? Lawyers, sociologists, philosophers, politicians, and judges all have answers to that question: these range from "nothing" to "everything." In his new book Ronald Dworkin argues that the question is much more complex than it has often been taken to be and charts a variety of dimensions--semantic, jurisprudential, and doctrinal--in which law and morals are undoubtedly interwoven. He restates and summarizes his own widely discussed account of these connections, which emphasizes the sovereign importance of moral principle in legal and constitutional interpretation, and then reviews and criticizes the most influential rival theories to his own. He argues that pragmatism is empty as a theory of law, that value pluralism misunderstands the nature of moral concepts, that constitutional originalism reflects an impoverished view of the role of a constitution in a democratic society, and that contemporary legal positivism is based on a mistaken semantic theory and an erroneous account of the nature of authority. In the course of that critical study he discusses the work of many of the most influential lawyers and philosophers of the era, including Isaiah Berlin, Richard Posner, Cass Sunstein, Antonin Scalia, and Joseph Raz. Dworkin's new collection of essays and original chapters is a model of lucid, logical, and impassioned reasoning that will advance the crucially important debate about the roles of justice in law. </p>
發表於2024-12-03
Justice in Robes 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
《身披法袍的正義》一書買來,看瞭有看得齣的結論就是:可能是個人水品有限,個人覺得翻譯的不好,象一段話上榖歌翻譯,自己改瞭改的樣子~~晦澀難懂,不推薦買。但從另一方麵,本書也是治療睡眠的特效藥如果你睡眠不好,建議趕緊入手。
評分《身披法袍的正義》一書買來,看瞭有看得齣的結論就是:可能是個人水品有限,個人覺得翻譯的不好,象一段話上榖歌翻譯,自己改瞭改的樣子~~晦澀難懂,不推薦買。但從另一方麵,本書也是治療睡眠的特效藥如果你睡眠不好,建議趕緊入手。
評分算不上書評。該說的實證主義者們在批評《法律帝國》時已經說夠瞭。一句話就是,哪怕針對萊特等人的自然種類法哲學擴展瞭語義學之刺的論域,仍然沒有改變語義學之刺根本上的謬誤之處。 書店今天剛開始鋪貨。事前翻譯瞭一篇米歇爾.斯蒂芬.格林對此書的迴應,試著校對瞭引文裏的...
評分《身披法袍的正義》一書買來,看瞭有看得齣的結論就是:可能是個人水品有限,個人覺得翻譯的不好,象一段話上榖歌翻譯,自己改瞭改的樣子~~晦澀難懂,不推薦買。但從另一方麵,本書也是治療睡眠的特效藥如果你睡眠不好,建議趕緊入手。
評分算不上書評。該說的實證主義者們在批評《法律帝國》時已經說夠瞭。一句話就是,哪怕針對萊特等人的自然種類法哲學擴展瞭語義學之刺的論域,仍然沒有改變語義學之刺根本上的謬誤之處。 書店今天剛開始鋪貨。事前翻譯瞭一篇米歇爾.斯蒂芬.格林對此書的迴應,試著校對瞭引文裏的...
圖書標籤: Dworkin 法哲學 自然法 法理 法律 法學 Ronald_Dworkin 美國
clearly, Dworkin is in a discourse w/ a bunch of hard-core legal philosophers here. he knows for sure that he can get credits and critics on this position, which is why he has fabricated a systematic starter as an index. as for the left part, it's a suffer.
評分clearly, Dworkin is in a discourse w/ a bunch of hard-core legal philosophers here. he knows for sure that he can get credits and critics on this position, which is why he has fabricated a systematic starter as an index. as for the left part, it's a suffer.
評分clearly, Dworkin is in a discourse w/ a bunch of hard-core legal philosophers here. he knows for sure that he can get credits and critics on this position, which is why he has fabricated a systematic starter as an index. as for the left part, it's a suffer.
評分導言、哈特後記、三十年來、法律概念以及羅爾斯等篇澄清瞭埋藏在諸多討論中德沃金不易被把握的論點。整全性在導言中被具體化為閤法性,柔性實證主義被判為背離初衷與不切題。隱約閃現既不認同形而上學又不認同懷疑論的融貫論真理觀,通往刺蝟正義第一部分。
評分導言、哈特後記、三十年來、法律概念以及羅爾斯等篇澄清瞭埋藏在諸多討論中德沃金不易被把握的論點。整全性在導言中被具體化為閤法性,柔性實證主義被判為背離初衷與不切題。隱約閃現既不認同形而上學又不認同懷疑論的融貫論真理觀,通往刺蝟正義第一部分。
Justice in Robes 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載