About the Author
Eric Voegelin (1901-1985) was one of the most original and influential philosophers of our time. Born in Cologne, Germany, he studied at the University of Vienna, where he became a professor of political science in the Faculty of Law. In 1938, he and his wife, fleeing Hitler, immigrated to the United States. They became American citizens in 1944. Voegelin spent much of his career at Louisiana State University, the University of Munich, and the Hoover Institution at Stanford University. During his lifetime he published many books and more than one hundred articles. The Collected Works of Eric Voegelin will make available in a uniform edition all of Voegelin's major writings.
About the Editor
David Walsh is Professor of Politics at the Catholic University of America in Washington, D.C. He is the author of The Growth of the Liberal Soul and the editor of Eric Voegelin's History of Political Ideas, Volume III, The Later Middle Ages and Volume VIII, Crisis and the Apocalypse of Man.
Volume 6 of The Collected Works of Eric Voegelin offers the first translation of the full German text of Anamnesis published in 1966. The previous English edition, translated by Gerhart Niemeyer, focused largely on the sections of Anamnesis dealing directly with Voegelin's philosophy of consciousness. It omitted some of the extensive historical studies on which the philosophy of consciousness was based. To properly understand Voegelin's work, however, it is essential to give equal weight to the empirical as well as the philosophical aspects. This complete version of Anamnesis captures the full integrity of his vision. It is at once scientific, in the sense of fidelity to the demands of historiographic scholarship, and philosophical, in exploring the significance of the texts for the meaning of human existence in society and history.
Anamnesis is a pivotal work within Voegelin's intellectual odyssey. Alone among Voegelin's books, it reveals an author looking back and taking stock of his growth rather than customarily forging ahead into new regions and new problems. This critical work is both a recollection of Voegelin's own development, reaching back even to his infant memories, and a demonstration of the anamnetic method as applied to a wide range of historically remembered materials.
Written as more than just a collection of essays, Anamnesis is the volume in which Voegelin works out for himself the reconceptualization of what Order and History, and by definition his central philosophical approach, is going to be. By revisiting his previous work—a departure from Voegelin's usual scholarly habits—he found at last the literary form for the kind of empirical philosophical meditation that had long absorbed his labors.
Parts I and III contain biographical and meditative reflections written by Voegelin in 1943 and 1965, respectively. The first part details the breakthrough by which Voegelin recovered consciousness from the current theories of consciousness. Part III begins as a rethinking of the Aristotelian exegesis of consciousness, and then expands into new areas of awareness that had not come within the knowledge of classic philosophy. Between these two meditative selections are eight studies that demonstrate how the historical phenomena of order gave rise to the type of analysis which culminates in the meditative exploration of consciousness.
發表於2024-11-27
Anamnesis 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
在What is Political Reality?(《何為政治實在?》)一文中,沃格林通過追溯ousia一詞的變遷考察瞭現代性。如果說現代性引發瞭“神性的內在化”,怪誰?在這篇文章中,沃格林覺得亞裏士多德難咎其責。 據沃格林分析,由於亞裏士多德不僅對各種being進行瞭分類,而且用ousia來...
評分在What is Political Reality?(《何為政治實在?》)一文中,沃格林通過追溯ousia一詞的變遷考察瞭現代性。如果說現代性引發瞭“神性的內在化”,怪誰?在這篇文章中,沃格林覺得亞裏士多德難咎其責。 據沃格林分析,由於亞裏士多德不僅對各種being進行瞭分類,而且用ousia來...
評分在What is Political Reality?(《何為政治實在?》)一文中,沃格林通過追溯ousia一詞的變遷考察瞭現代性。如果說現代性引發瞭“神性的內在化”,怪誰?在這篇文章中,沃格林覺得亞裏士多德難咎其責。 據沃格林分析,由於亞裏士多德不僅對各種being進行瞭分類,而且用ousia來...
評分在What is Political Reality?(《何為政治實在?》)一文中,沃格林通過追溯ousia一詞的變遷考察瞭現代性。如果說現代性引發瞭“神性的內在化”,怪誰?在這篇文章中,沃格林覺得亞裏士多德難咎其責。 據沃格林分析,由於亞裏士多德不僅對各種being進行瞭分類,而且用ousia來...
評分在What is Political Reality?(《何為政治實在?》)一文中,沃格林通過追溯ousia一詞的變遷考察瞭現代性。如果說現代性引發瞭“神性的內在化”,怪誰?在這篇文章中,沃格林覺得亞裏士多德難咎其責。 據沃格林分析,由於亞裏士多德不僅對各種being進行瞭分類,而且用ousia來...
圖書標籤: 沃格林 默默打勾 史學研究 Voegelin Historicism&Science外文
沃格林學術生涯中最重要的著作之一。憑這本書和《秩序與曆史》,沃格林和柏拉圖、亞裏士多德、奧古斯丁等人站在一個階梯上。(4分打給英譯文,5分打給內容)
評分沃格林學術生涯中最重要的著作之一。憑這本書和《秩序與曆史》,沃格林和柏拉圖、亞裏士多德、奧古斯丁等人站在一個階梯上。(4分打給英譯文,5分打給內容)
評分沃格林學術生涯中最重要的著作之一。憑這本書和《秩序與曆史》,沃格林和柏拉圖、亞裏士多德、奧古斯丁等人站在一個階梯上。(4分打給英譯文,5分打給內容)
評分沃格林學術生涯中最重要的著作之一。憑這本書和《秩序與曆史》,沃格林和柏拉圖、亞裏士多德、奧古斯丁等人站在一個階梯上。(4分打給英譯文,5分打給內容)
評分沃格林學術生涯中最重要的著作之一。憑這本書和《秩序與曆史》,沃格林和柏拉圖、亞裏士多德、奧古斯丁等人站在一個階梯上。(4分打給英譯文,5分打給內容)
Anamnesis 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載