In one of the most detailed and powerfully argued books published on American intervention in Vietnam, Fredrik Logevall examines the last great unanswered question on the war: Could the tragedy have been averted? His answer: a resounding yes. Challenging the prevailing myth that the outbreak of large-scale fighting in 1965 was essentially unavoidable, "Choosing War" argues that the Vietnam War was unnecessary, not merely in hindsight but in the context of its time. Why, then, did major war break out? Logevall shows it was partly because of the timidity of the key opponents of U.S. involvement, and partly because of the staunch opposition of the Kennedy and Johnson administrations to early negotiations. His superlative account shows that U.S. officials chose war over disengagement despite deep doubts about the war's prospects and about Vietnam's importance to U.S. security and over the opposition of important voices in the Congress, in the press, and in the world community. They did so because of concerns about credibility - not so much America's or the Democratic party's credibility, but their own personal credibility. Based on six years of painstaking research, this book is the first to place American policymaking on Vietnam in 1963-65 in its wider international context using multiarchival sources, many of them recently declassified. Here we see for the first time how the war played in the key world capitals - not merely in Washington, Saigon, and Hanoi, but also in Paris and London, in Tokyo and Ottawa, in Moscow and Beijing. "Choosing War" is a powerful and devastating account of fear, favor, and hypocrisy at the highest echelons of American government, a book that will change forever our understanding of the tragedy that was the Vietnam War.
發表於2024-11-19
Choosing War 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: 越戰 美國
範式規整,時間軸拉得極細,關於the long 1964的敘述幾乎麵麵俱到。 “個人信譽說”對約翰遜戰爭升級動機的理解略顯狹隘,沒有考慮到避免共和黨阻殺民權立法的國內政策因素。 作為1999年完成,寫作曆時六年的博士論文,充分應用瞭當時新解密的美國檔案材料,對法國、加拿大、英國檔案也有所涉及,可惜的是對印支三國及中方“抗美援越”史料無法做到直接引用,限製瞭其跨國史視角的展開。
評分範式規整,時間軸拉得極細,關於the long 1964的敘述幾乎麵麵俱到。 “個人信譽說”對約翰遜戰爭升級動機的理解略顯狹隘,沒有考慮到避免共和黨阻殺民權立法的國內政策因素。 作為1999年完成,寫作曆時六年的博士論文,充分應用瞭當時新解密的美國檔案材料,對法國、加拿大、英國檔案也有所涉及,可惜的是對印支三國及中方“抗美援越”史料無法做到直接引用,限製瞭其跨國史視角的展開。
評分範式規整,時間軸拉得極細,關於the long 1964的敘述幾乎麵麵俱到。 “個人信譽說”對約翰遜戰爭升級動機的理解略顯狹隘,沒有考慮到避免共和黨阻殺民權立法的國內政策因素。 作為1999年完成,寫作曆時六年的博士論文,充分應用瞭當時新解密的美國檔案材料,對法國、加拿大、英國檔案也有所涉及,可惜的是對印支三國及中方“抗美援越”史料無法做到直接引用,限製瞭其跨國史視角的展開。
評分範式規整,時間軸拉得極細,關於the long 1964的敘述幾乎麵麵俱到。 “個人信譽說”對約翰遜戰爭升級動機的理解略顯狹隘,沒有考慮到避免共和黨阻殺民權立法的國內政策因素。 作為1999年完成,寫作曆時六年的博士論文,充分應用瞭當時新解密的美國檔案材料,對法國、加拿大、英國檔案也有所涉及,可惜的是對印支三國及中方“抗美援越”史料無法做到直接引用,限製瞭其跨國史視角的展開。
評分範式規整,時間軸拉得極細,關於the long 1964的敘述幾乎麵麵俱到。 “個人信譽說”對約翰遜戰爭升級動機的理解略顯狹隘,沒有考慮到避免共和黨阻殺民權立法的國內政策因素。 作為1999年完成,寫作曆時六年的博士論文,充分應用瞭當時新解密的美國檔案材料,對法國、加拿大、英國檔案也有所涉及,可惜的是對印支三國及中方“抗美援越”史料無法做到直接引用,限製瞭其跨國史視角的展開。
Choosing War 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載