How Institutions Think

How Institutions Think pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025

玛丽·道格拉斯(Mary Douglas)英国社会人类学家1921年3月25日出生于意大利圣雷莫。从大学到博士毕业一直就读于牛津大学。她早年曾受国际非洲协会(International African Institute)的资助,在比利时治下的刚果工作。她做过牛津大学和伦敦大学学院(University College of London)的人类学讲师,在伦敦大学学习人类学并在其后成为该大学的社会人类学教授。1977年,她作为罗素贤人基金会(Russell Sage Foundation)的文化研究部主任前往美国。1981年她作为艾瓦隆基金(Avalon Foundation)赞助的人文学教授赴美国西北大学教学,1986年任普林斯顿大学的客座教授,她于2007年5月16日在英国伦敦去世。

出版者:Syracuse University Press
作者:Mary Douglas
出品人:
页数:146
译者:
出版时间:1986-7
价格:$19.95
装帧:
isbn号码:9781033663752
丛书系列:
图书标签:
  • 人类学 
  • 社会人类学 
  • 社会学 
  • 理论 
  • 玛丽道格拉斯 
  • 求书 
  • 11 
  •  
想要找书就要到 本本书屋
立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页
你会得到大惊喜!!

First published in 1986 Mary Douglas’ theory of institutions uses the sociological theories of Emile Durkheim and Ludwig Fleck to determine not only how institutions think, but also the extent to which thinking itself is dependent upon institutions. Different kinds of institutions allow individuals to think different kinds of thoughts and to respond to different emotions. It is just as difficult to explain how individuals come to share the categories of their thought as to explain how they ever manage to sink their private interests for a common good.

Douglas forewarns us that institutions do not think independently, nor do they have purposes, nor do they build themselves. As we construct our institutions, we are squeezing each other’s ideas into a common shape in order to prove their legitimacy by sheer numbers. She admonishes us not to take comfort in the thought that primitives may think through institutions, but moderns decide on important issues individually. Our legitimated institutions make major decisions, and these decisions always involve ethical principles.

具体描述

读后感

评分

想像这样一个情形:一组五位探险者困陷在石洞中,他们已知洞外救援工作正在紧张进行,但需要十余日方能打通。而此时他们食粮已尽,无法维持到救援成功的时刻。惟一生存下去的希望是牺牲成员之一,食其肉以延生,以一死拯救四条生命。这一组成员会如何解决这一困境呢? 在《制度...

评分

想像这样一个情形:一组五位探险者困陷在石洞中,他们已知洞外救援工作正在紧张进行,但需要十余日方能打通。而此时他们食粮已尽,无法维持到救援成功的时刻。惟一生存下去的希望是牺牲成员之一,食其肉以延生,以一死拯救四条生命。这一组成员会如何解决这一困境呢? 在《制度...

评分

想像这样一个情形:一组五位探险者困陷在石洞中,他们已知洞外救援工作正在紧张进行,但需要十余日方能打通。而此时他们食粮已尽,无法维持到救援成功的时刻。惟一生存下去的希望是牺牲成员之一,食其肉以延生,以一死拯救四条生命。这一组成员会如何解决这一困境呢? 在《制度...

评分

想像这样一个情形:一组五位探险者困陷在石洞中,他们已知洞外救援工作正在紧张进行,但需要十余日方能打通。而此时他们食粮已尽,无法维持到救援成功的时刻。惟一生存下去的希望是牺牲成员之一,食其肉以延生,以一死拯救四条生命。这一组成员会如何解决这一困境呢? 在《制度...

评分

想像这样一个情形:一组五位探险者困陷在石洞中,他们已知洞外救援工作正在紧张进行,但需要十余日方能打通。而此时他们食粮已尽,无法维持到救援成功的时刻。惟一生存下去的希望是牺牲成员之一,食其肉以延生,以一死拯救四条生命。这一组成员会如何解决这一困境呢? 在《制度...

用户评价

评分

道格拉斯太涂尔干了,不过似乎她不同意solidarity and institution have minds of their own…An answer is only seen to be the right one if it sustains the institutional thinking that is already in the minds of individuals as they try to decide.

评分

道格拉斯太涂尔干了,不过似乎她不同意solidarity and institution have minds of their own…An answer is only seen to be the right one if it sustains the institutional thinking that is already in the minds of individuals as they try to decide.

评分

道格拉斯太涂尔干了,不过似乎她不同意solidarity and institution have minds of their own…An answer is only seen to be the right one if it sustains the institutional thinking that is already in the minds of individuals as they try to decide.

评分

道格拉斯太涂尔干了,不过似乎她不同意solidarity and institution have minds of their own…An answer is only seen to be the right one if it sustains the institutional thinking that is already in the minds of individuals as they try to decide.

评分

道格拉斯太涂尔干了,不过似乎她不同意solidarity and institution have minds of their own…An answer is only seen to be the right one if it sustains the institutional thinking that is already in the minds of individuals as they try to decide.

本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度google,bing,sogou

© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有