具体描述
This is the first environmental history of Russia's steppes. From the early-eighteenth century, settlers moved to the semi-arid but fertile grasslands from wetter, forested regions in central and northern Russia and Ukraine, and from central Europe. By the late-nineteenth century, they had turned the steppes into the bread basket of the Russian Empire and parts of Europe. But there was another side to this story. The steppe region was hit by recurring droughts, winds from the east whipped up dust storms, the fertile black earth suffered severe erosion, crops failed, and in the worst years there was famine.
David Moon analyses how naturalists and scientists came to understand the steppe environment, including the origins of the fertile black earth. He also analyses how scientists tried to understand environmental change, including climate change. Farmers, and the scientists who advised them, tried different ways to deal with the recurring droughts: planting trees, irrigation, and cultivating the soil. More sustainable, however, were techniques of cultivation to retain scarce moisture in the soil. Among the pioneers were Mennonite settlers. Such approaches aimed to work with the environment, rather than trying to change it by planting trees or supplying more water artificially.
The story is similar to the Dust Bowl on the Great Plains of the USA, which share a similar environment and environmental history. David Moon places the story of the steppes in the wider context of the environmental history of European colonialism around the globe.
作者简介
David Moon, Anniversary Professor, Department of History, University of York
David Moon is a specialist on Russian history. In recent years his research has focused on environmental history in a transnational context. He combines conventional historical research in archives and libraries with field work in the environments he studies. He has spent much of his career teaching at universities in the north of England and Scotland. He also has extensive experience of both Russia and the USA. He studied for a year at Leningrad State University in what was then the Soviet Union, and makes regular visits to Russia and Ukraine, including the steppe region, for research and field work.
目录信息
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
这本书的叙事节奏把握得极其精妙，它就像一条蜿蜒流淌的河流，时而平静舒缓，让你有时间去品味那些细腻的情感描写和环境渲染；时而又猛然加速，将你卷入那些决定历史走向的关键冲突与转折点中。我特别欣赏作者在处理人物塑造上的功力。那些生活在特定历史背景下的小人物，他们的喜怒哀乐、他们的挣扎与成就，都被赋予了鲜活的生命力。你不会觉得他们只是历史的符号，而是有血有肉、真实存在的个体。比如那位坚持记录星象的隐士，以及那位试图平衡部落间利益的年轻领袖，他们的故事线索交织在一起，共同构建了一幅复杂而真实的社会图景。这种将宏大历史背景与微观个体命运紧密结合的叙事手法，极大地增强了阅读的代入感和情感共鸣。
评分从纯粹的学术角度来看，这本书展现了令人惊叹的跨学科整合能力。作者显然在地理学、人类学乃至气候变迁的研究上投入了巨大的心血。书中引用了大量的考古发现和地质学证据来支撑其论点，使得整部作品的论证逻辑无懈可击。然而，最可贵的是，作者并没有让这些严谨的学术内容变得枯燥乏味。相反，他将这些数据和理论巧妙地融入到故事的肌理之中，让知识的传递变成了一种自然的学习过程。例如，在探讨某个区域农业发展瓶颈时，作者会详细解释土壤成分的变化如何直接影响了作物的适应性，这些信息既是学术性的，又是情节推进所必需的背景。对于那些对知识深度有要求的读者来说，这本书无疑是一座知识的宝库，但它不是冷冰冰的教科书，而是热烈而充满激情的探索之旅。
评分这本书的语言风格带有一种独特的美感，充满了对自然力量的敬畏。我尤其钟爱作者用来描绘景观的词汇——那种既精确又充满诗意的表达方式，让人仿佛能闻到空气中的泥土气息，感受到风吹过草原的力度。书中对光影变化的捕捉，对季节更迭的细致描摹，都显示出作者深厚的文学底蕴。读到描绘大迁徙的部分时，那种磅礴的气势和无边的苍凉感交织在一起，令人心潮澎湃。它让人反思人类在宇宙中的渺小，但同时也赞颂了人类为了生存所展现出的非凡创造力。这种将文学的抒情性与历史的严谨性完美融合的文风，使得这本书在众多历史著作中脱颖而出，成为了一部真正值得反复品味的文学作品。
评分看完这本书，我内心产生了一种强烈的“时间感”的重新校准。它迫使我跳脱出日常生活的琐碎，去思考更深层次的问题：我们从何处来？我们所依赖的文明基础是如何建立起来的？书中对早期社区决策模式的分析尤其发人深省，它揭示了集体智慧和个体权威之间复杂而微妙的平衡，这种平衡的建立，远比我们想象的要艰难和充满妥协。这本书并没有提供简单的答案，而是提出了更多深刻的问题，激发读者进行更深层次的哲学思考。它不仅仅是一部历史著作，更像是一面映照我们当代社会运作逻辑的古老镜子。合上书页后，那种对人类生存状态的沉思并未停止，这本书的价值，正在于它能持续地在你脑海中回响，久久不散。
评分翻开这本书的扉页，我立刻被它那种宏大叙事的气场所吸引。作者以一种近乎史诗般的笔触，描绘了人类在广袤无垠的土地上，如何与自然搏斗，又如何被自然塑形的过程。书中对于早期文明的社会结构、迁徙路线以及技术革新的细致考量，让我仿佛置身于那个充满未知与原始力量的时代。它不仅仅是在记录历史事件，更是在探索一种精神——那种面对严酷环境时，人类不屈的韧性和对未知世界的渴望。阅读过程中，我常常会停下来，凝视着那些描绘早期工具和耕作方法的段落，想象着先人们是如何依靠智慧和汗水，将荒芜之地变为可以供养生命的家园。这种对人类起源和早期生存智慧的深刻洞察，无疑是这本书最引人入胜之处。那种跨越千年的对话感，让这本书读起来有一种厚重却又充满希望的力量。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有