The Religious and the Political

Bryan S. Turner is the Presidential Professor of Sociology and the Director of the Committee on Religion at the Graduate Center, the City University of New York, and the Director of the Center for Religion and Society at the University of Western Sydney. He is the author of Religion and Modern Society and the editor of The Cambridge Dictionary of Sociology .

出版者:Cambridge University Press

作者:Bryan S. Turner

页数:290

出版时间:2013-7

价格:$ 37.28

装帧:平装

isbn号码:9780521675314

图书标签:statesociologyreligion

While the relationships between ethics and religion, and violence and politics, are of enduring interest, the interface between religion and violence is one of the most problematic features of the contemporary world. Following in the tradition of Max Weber's historical and comparative study of religions, this book explores the many ways in which religion and politics are both combined and separated across different world religions and societies. Through a variety of case studies including the monarchy, marriage, law and conversion, Bryan S. Turner explores different manifestations of secularization, and how the separation of church and state is either compromised or abandoned. He considers how different states manage religion in culturally and religiously diverse societies and concludes with a discussion of the contemporary problems facing the liberal theory of freedom of religion. The underlying theoretical issue is the conditions for legitimacy of rule in modern societies experiencing global changes.

用户评价

一般。每一章都是先沿着韦伯的思路进行讨论，相关分析也比较浅尝辄止。只有威斯特伐利亚体系这个角度一直贯穿始终，对于欧美当代问题的分析比较正常，到了亚洲，尤其是中国，许多地方错乱的厉害。我觉得也说不上歧视，其实就是不会，随便抄抄、看别人写的然后构建一个架子。总体上不出韦伯的分析。

一般。每一章都是先沿着韦伯的思路进行讨论，相关分析也比较浅尝辄止。只有威斯特伐利亚体系这个角度一直贯穿始终，对于欧美当代问题的分析比较正常，到了亚洲，尤其是中国，许多地方错乱的厉害。我觉得也说不上歧视，其实就是不会，随便抄抄、看别人写的然后构建一个架子。总体上不出韦伯的分析。

一般。每一章都是先沿着韦伯的思路进行讨论，相关分析也比较浅尝辄止。只有威斯特伐利亚体系这个角度一直贯穿始终，对于欧美当代问题的分析比较正常，到了亚洲，尤其是中国，许多地方错乱的厉害。我觉得也说不上歧视，其实就是不会，随便抄抄、看别人写的然后构建一个架子。总体上不出韦伯的分析。

一般。每一章都是先沿着韦伯的思路进行讨论，相关分析也比较浅尝辄止。只有威斯特伐利亚体系这个角度一直贯穿始终，对于欧美当代问题的分析比较正常，到了亚洲，尤其是中国，许多地方错乱的厉害。我觉得也说不上歧视，其实就是不会，随便抄抄、看别人写的然后构建一个架子。总体上不出韦伯的分析。

一般。每一章都是先沿着韦伯的思路进行讨论，相关分析也比较浅尝辄止。只有威斯特伐利亚体系这个角度一直贯穿始终，对于欧美当代问题的分析比较正常，到了亚洲，尤其是中国，许多地方错乱的厉害。我觉得也说不上歧视，其实就是不会，随便抄抄、看别人写的然后构建一个架子。总体上不出韦伯的分析。