The Chomsky-Foucault Debate

Noam Chomsky is Professor of Linguistics at MIT and a world-renowned political thinker and activist. The author of numerous books, including On Language and Understanding Power (both available from The New Press), he lives in Cambridge, Massachusetts.Michel Foucault (1926-84) held a chair in the History of Systems of Thought at the Collège de France. The New Press has published three previous volumes of his work as well as a collection, The Essential Foucault.John Rajchman is a professor of philosophy at Columbia University and author of Michel Foucault. He lives in New York City.

出版者:New Press, The

作者:Noam Chomsky

页数:213

出版时间:2006-9-1

价格:USD 15.95

装帧:Paperback

isbn号码:9781595581341

图书标签:ChomskyFoucault哲学福柯语言学社会理论乔姆斯基思想

承接 住宅 自建房 室内改造 装修设计 免费咨询 QQ：624617358 一级注册建筑师 亲自为您回答、经验丰富，价格亲民。无论项目大小，都全力服务。期待合作，欢迎咨询！QQ：624617358

Two of the twentieth century's most influential thinkers debate a perennial question.

In 1971, at the height of the Vietnam War and at a time of great political and social instability, two of the world's leading intellectuals, Noam Chomsky and Michel Foucault, were invited by Dutch philosopher Fons Edlers to debate an age-old question: is there such a thing as "innate" human nature independent of our experiences and external influences?

The resulting dialogue is one of the most original, provocative, and spontaneous exchanges to have occurred between contemporary philosophers, and above all serves as a concise introduction to their basic theories. What begins as a philosophical argument rooted in linguistics (Chomsky) and the theory of knowledge (Foucault), soon evolves into a broader discussion encompassing a wide range of topics, from science, history, and behaviorism to creativity, freedom, and the struggle for justice in the realm of politics.

In addition to the debate itself, this volume features a newly written introduction by noted Foucault scholar John Rajchman and includes additional text by Noam Chomsky.

读后感

读这个对话录，内容倒先不讲。我起码觉得上得了台面的人辩证思维能力要发展得很好。两个人交流观点，其实是在补充同一个命题的不同方面，首先得有这种概念，并不是“你对我错”这种对立式的搏杀。人当然有主观倾向，prefer to 完全可以理解，都是情结在作怪。重要的是不是所有...  

看《福柯的生死爱欲》又想起这书，谈到的好像就是这场世纪辩论。摘两段乔对福柯的评价，原书见第六章，p266&p268： 一边读一边发笑。我也不确定我读懂福柯多少，大概很少很少，但他真是个对我意义重大的哲学家（可能因为我们同一天生日，他就在我心里比较特别，哈哈）；在...  

看《福柯的生死爱欲》又想起这书，谈到的好像就是这场世纪辩论。摘两段乔对福柯的评价，原书见第六章，p266&p268： 一边读一边发笑。我也不确定我读懂福柯多少，大概很少很少，但他真是个对我意义重大的哲学家（可能因为我们同一天生日，他就在我心里比较特别，哈哈）；在...  

碰到跟福柯有关的书总是想唠叨两笔，也不知为什么。 这个辩论很早在youtube就传得很火，现在终于整理出了文字版，方便大家阅读。书的篇幅不长，两个小时读完足矣，不过内容却讨论的是社会科学乃至哲学的一些基本问题。所以我觉得这本书不要叫目前这个标题，还是应该叫原先那个...  

此书是1971年乔姆斯基与福柯论辩的产物，根据访谈者方斯.厄尔德斯的描述，“两位大师的外貌和内心大相径庭”，这恐怕是读后最粗浅的印象之一，乔姆斯基温婉而客气地滔滔不绝，时而蹦出些想象和比喻用以解释，而福柯这家伙学理性的话语缜密而透彻，丝毫不用多说，一点点就已经...  

用户评价

这说的就是被别人完爆了还不自知继续blablabla……鸡同鸭讲

赫赫，卖萌。 乔姆斯基在这里就是纳伊夫的代言人。。。福柯就自顾自卖萌

原来这个我没有标过（。

人的本质是虐恋和掠念，操

原来这个我没有标过（。