Noam Chomsky is Professor of Linguistics at MIT and a world-renowned political thinker and activist. The author of numerous books, including On Language and Understanding Power (both available from The New Press), he lives in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Michel Foucault (1926-84) held a chair in the History of Systems of Thought at the Collège de France. The New Press has published three previous volumes of his work as well as a collection, The Essential Foucault.
John Rajchman is a professor of philosophy at Columbia University and author of Michel Foucault. He lives in New York City.
Two of the twentieth century's most influential thinkers debate a perennial question.
In 1971, at the height of the Vietnam War and at a time of great political and social instability, two of the world's leading intellectuals, Noam Chomsky and Michel Foucault, were invited by Dutch philosopher Fons Edlers to debate an age-old question: is there such a thing as "innate" human nature independent of our experiences and external influences?
The resulting dialogue is one of the most original, provocative, and spontaneous exchanges to have occurred between contemporary philosophers, and above all serves as a concise introduction to their basic theories. What begins as a philosophical argument rooted in linguistics (Chomsky) and the theory of knowledge (Foucault), soon evolves into a broader discussion encompassing a wide range of topics, from science, history, and behaviorism to creativity, freedom, and the struggle for justice in the realm of politics.
In addition to the debate itself, this volume features a newly written introduction by noted Foucault scholar John Rajchman and includes additional text by Noam Chomsky.
發表於2025-04-11
The Chomsky-Foucault Debate 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
碰到跟福柯有關的書總是想嘮叨兩筆,也不知為什麼。 這個辯論很早在youtube就傳得很火,現在終於整理齣瞭文字版,方便大傢閱讀。書的篇幅不長,兩個小時讀完足矣,不過內容卻討論的是社會科學乃至哲學的一些基本問題。所以我覺得這本書不要叫目前這個標題,還是應該叫原先那個...
評分莫尤 【早些時候用小號寫過的一篇書評,偶然看到,納悶怎麼這麼眼熟。。。。】 此書是1971年喬姆斯基與福柯論辯的産物,根據訪談者方斯.厄爾德斯的描述,“兩位大師的外貌和內心大相徑庭”,這恐怕是讀後最粗淺的印象之一,喬姆斯基溫婉而客氣地滔...
評分莫尤 【早些時候用小號寫過的一篇書評,偶然看到,納悶怎麼這麼眼熟。。。。】 此書是1971年喬姆斯基與福柯論辯的産物,根據訪談者方斯.厄爾德斯的描述,“兩位大師的外貌和內心大相徑庭”,這恐怕是讀後最粗淺的印象之一,喬姆斯基溫婉而客氣地滔...
評分莫尤 【早些時候用小號寫過的一篇書評,偶然看到,納悶怎麼這麼眼熟。。。。】 此書是1971年喬姆斯基與福柯論辯的産物,根據訪談者方斯.厄爾德斯的描述,“兩位大師的外貌和內心大相徑庭”,這恐怕是讀後最粗淺的印象之一,喬姆斯基溫婉而客氣地滔...
評分莫尤 【早些時候用小號寫過的一篇書評,偶然看到,納悶怎麼這麼眼熟。。。。】 此書是1971年喬姆斯基與福柯論辯的産物,根據訪談者方斯.厄爾德斯的描述,“兩位大師的外貌和內心大相徑庭”,這恐怕是讀後最粗淺的印象之一,喬姆斯基溫婉而客氣地滔...
圖書標籤: Chomsky Foucault 哲學 福柯 語言學 社會理論 喬姆斯基 思想
赫赫,賣萌。 喬姆斯基在這裏就是納伊夫的代言人。。。福柯就自顧自賣萌
評分The Foucault-Chomsky Debate on Human Nature
評分The Foucault-Chomsky Debate on Human Nature
評分喬姆斯基:人性.. 福柯:沒有人性。 C:要去中心化 .. F:醒醒吧沒有人性這種東西。C:要戰鬥 .. F:但是你知道並沒有人性 C:為瞭公義 .. F:不可能的因為沒有人性 ..
評分原來這個我沒有標過(。
The Chomsky-Foucault Debate 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載