保羅·利科(Paul Ricoeur),法國著名哲學傢、當代最重要的解釋學傢之一。曾任法國斯特拉斯堡大學、巴黎大學、南特大學教授,並為美國芝加哥大學、耶魯大學,加拿大濛特利爾大學等大學客座教授。
1913年2月27日,利科生於法國南部小鎮Valence的一個新教傢庭。他一生頗為坎坷,幾乎曆經20世紀所有重大事件。一戰中,他成瞭戰爭孤兒;二戰中,他成瞭波蘭戰俘營裏的囚徒。二戰結束後,利科迴到巴黎繼續求學,在高校任教不久,他又被捲入1968年法國著名的“五月風暴”。他心灰意冷,辭去教職,遠走異鄉,長期在美國芝加哥大學任職,且在歐洲本土之外聲譽鵲起。直到上世紀80年代法國知識界纔意識到他們錯過瞭一位大哲,開始給予利科以一個思想傢應有的地位:他先後被授予利奧波德·盧卡斯奬、斯圖加特的黑格爾奬、法國的學術奬、道德與政治科學院奬。利科擔任瞭巴黎現象學詮釋學研究中心主任和法國國際哲學學會會長。退休之後,他還獲瑞士的巴爾贊奬(1999),日本的京都奬(2000),保羅四世教皇奬(2003)等等,尤其是2004年被美國國會圖書館授予有人文學科領域的諾貝爾奬之稱的剋魯格人文與社會科學終身成就奬。評委會認為:利科的成就在於“汲取瞭西方哲學的全部傳統來探索和解釋普遍的問題:什麼是自我?記憶是如何被運用和濫用的?責任的本質是什麼?”
盡管利科一生著述頗豐,但有人說,他的寫作和思考始終在迴應一個古老的命題:一個人如何在倫理生活中有確信地去行動。
2005年5月20日,利科在睡夢中安詳辭世。
Why do major historical events such as the Holocaust occupy the forefront of the collective consciousness, while profound moments such as the Armenian genocide, the McCarthy era, and France's role in North Africa stand distantly behind? Is it possible that history "overly remembers" some events at the expense of others? A landmark work in philosophy, Paul Ricoeur's Memory, History, Forgetting examines this reciprocal relationship between remembering and forgetting, showing how it affects both the perception of historical experience and the production of historical narrative.
Memory, History, Forgetting, like its title, is divided into three major sections. Ricoeur first takes a phenomenological approach to memory and mnemonical devices. The underlying question here is how a memory of present can be of something absent, the past. The second section addresses recent work by historians by reopening the question of the nature and truth of historical knowledge. Ricoeur explores whether historians, who can write a history of memory, can truly break with all dependence on memory, including memories that resist representation. The third and final section is a profound meditation on the necessity of forgetting as a condition for the possibility of remembering, and whether there can be something like happy forgetting in parallel to happy memory. Throughout the book there are careful and close readings of the texts of Aristotle and Plato, of Descartes and Kant, and of Halbwachs and Pierre Nora.
A momentous achievement in the career of one of the most significant philosophers of our age, Memory, History, Forgetting provides the crucial link between Ricoeur's Time and Narrative and Oneself as Another and his recent reflections on ethics and the problems of responsibility and representation.
?His success in revealing the internal relations between recalling and forgetting, and how this dynamic becomes problematic in light of events once present but now past, will inspire academic dialogue and response but also holds great appeal to educated general readers in search of both method for and insight from considering the ethical ramifications of modern events. . . . It is indeed a master work, not only in Ricoeur?s own vita but also in contemporary European philosophy.??Library Journal
?Ricoeur writes the best kind of philosophy?critical, economical, and clear.?? New York Times Book Review
發表於2024-11-27
Memory, History, Forgetting 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
Eikon和tupos的對位。Phantasma和blasphamy的詞源學聯絡。Pharmatika的隱喻:治療學和規範理論(康吉萊姆的病態範疇學)。德 塞爾托:曆史編纂學、神秘主義和神意曆史的關係,承續沃格林、潘諾夫斯基,秩序主義誕生於此岸和彼岸的自明性居間狀態(metaxy),Nous則是諸種神啓的符...
評分Eikon和tupos的對位。Phantasma和blasphamy的詞源學聯絡。Pharmatika的隱喻:治療學和規範理論(康吉萊姆的病態範疇學)。德 塞爾托:曆史編纂學、神秘主義和神意曆史的關係,承續沃格林、潘諾夫斯基,秩序主義誕生於此岸和彼岸的自明性居間狀態(metaxy),Nous則是諸種神啓的符...
評分Eikon和tupos的對位。Phantasma和blasphamy的詞源學聯絡。Pharmatika的隱喻:治療學和規範理論(康吉萊姆的病態範疇學)。德 塞爾托:曆史編纂學、神秘主義和神意曆史的關係,承續沃格林、潘諾夫斯基,秩序主義誕生於此岸和彼岸的自明性居間狀態(metaxy),Nous則是諸種神啓的符...
評分Eikon和tupos的對位。Phantasma和blasphamy的詞源學聯絡。Pharmatika的隱喻:治療學和規範理論(康吉萊姆的病態範疇學)。德 塞爾托:曆史編纂學、神秘主義和神意曆史的關係,承續沃格林、潘諾夫斯基,秩序主義誕生於此岸和彼岸的自明性居間狀態(metaxy),Nous則是諸種神啓的符...
評分Eikon和tupos的對位。Phantasma和blasphamy的詞源學聯絡。Pharmatika的隱喻:治療學和規範理論(康吉萊姆的病態範疇學)。德 塞爾托:曆史編纂學、神秘主義和神意曆史的關係,承續沃格林、潘諾夫斯基,秩序主義誕生於此岸和彼岸的自明性居間狀態(metaxy),Nous則是諸種神啓的符...
圖書標籤: 哲學 Ricoeur 思想史 Philosophy 記憶、曆史與遺忘 記憶 曆史 記憶與曆史
already the Nietzschean banner is posted in the title. an exponential growth of the second essay in the Untimely Meditations
評分already the Nietzschean banner is posted in the title. an exponential growth of the second essay in the Untimely Meditations
評分羅裏吧嗦
評分既然被刪瞭,就再寫一次: 利柯講到寬恕這一概念的底端是作惡之人對過錯的供認,頂端是寬恕者的頌歌,二者之間存在著一種縱嚮不對稱。而橫嚮上來看,如果把寬恕納入一種交換關係的話,隻有當一方請求寬恕,另一方纔有可能給予寬恕(此處利柯引瞭一個問題:我們能夠寬恕不承認自己過錯的人嗎?)。不妨問一句:真正作惡之人何時悔過,又可會有受害者對這樣的惡予以寬恕?
評分already the Nietzschean banner is posted in the title. an exponential growth of the second essay in the Untimely Meditations
Memory, History, Forgetting 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載