William Empson was the foremost English literary critic of the twentieth century. He was a man of huge energy and curiosity, and a genuine eccentric who remained imperturbable in the face of all the extraordinary circumstances in which he found himself. The discovery of contraceptives in his possession by a bedmaker at Cambridge University led to his being robbed of a promised Fellowship. Yet Seven Types of Ambiguity, drafted while he was still an undergraduate, promptly brought him world-wide fame. Empson invented modern literary criticism in English. He acted too as a cultural fifth-columnist, challenging received doctrine in life and literature. 'It is a very good thing for a poet ...to be saying something which is considered very shocking at the time,' he maintained. 'To become morally independent of one's formative society ...is the grandest theme of all literature, because it is the only means of moral progress.' His public life took him through many of the major political events of the modern world -- the rise of imperialism in Japan, the Sino-Japanese war in China, wartime propaganda for the BBC, and the Chinese civil war and Communist takeover of Peking in 1949.His friends and critical sparring partners included I. A. Richards, Kathleen Raine, J. B. S. Haldane, Humphrey Jennings, George Orwell, Robert Lowell, Dylan Thomas, Stephen Spender, Helen Gardner, and T. S. Eliot. 'It is of great importance now that writers should try to keep a certain world-mindedness,' he insisted. 'Without the literatures you cannot have a sense of history, and history is like the balancing-pole of the tightrope-walker ...; and nowadays we very much need the longer balancing-pole of not national but world history.' His passionate world-mindedness, and his humanism, combativeness, and wit, are fully in evidence in this, the first of two volumes exploring his remarkable life and work.
發表於2024-12-27
William Empson 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
燕蔔蓀是我最喜歡的詩歌批評傢,雖然隻讀過他的一本書,但是印象極其深刻……他的性格儼然與他在照片中所呈現齣來的容貌反差太大。父親是牧師,和尼采一樣,他是一個反基督者,質疑“上帝就是愛”是“泛靈論”,曾經認為信教是“精神上的手淫”(嗬嗬),因為寢室裏有避孕套而...
評分燕蔔蓀是我最喜歡的詩歌批評傢,雖然隻讀過他的一本書,但是印象極其深刻……他的性格儼然與他在照片中所呈現齣來的容貌反差太大。父親是牧師,和尼采一樣,他是一個反基督者,質疑“上帝就是愛”是“泛靈論”,曾經認為信教是“精神上的手淫”(嗬嗬),因為寢室裏有避孕套而...
評分燕蔔蓀是我最喜歡的詩歌批評傢,雖然隻讀過他的一本書,但是印象極其深刻……他的性格儼然與他在照片中所呈現齣來的容貌反差太大。父親是牧師,和尼采一樣,他是一個反基督者,質疑“上帝就是愛”是“泛靈論”,曾經認為信教是“精神上的手淫”(嗬嗬),因為寢室裏有避孕套而...
評分燕蔔蓀是我最喜歡的詩歌批評傢,雖然隻讀過他的一本書,但是印象極其深刻……他的性格儼然與他在照片中所呈現齣來的容貌反差太大。父親是牧師,和尼采一樣,他是一個反基督者,質疑“上帝就是愛”是“泛靈論”,曾經認為信教是“精神上的手淫”(嗬嗬),因為寢室裏有避孕套而...
評分燕蔔蓀是我最喜歡的詩歌批評傢,雖然隻讀過他的一本書,但是印象極其深刻……他的性格儼然與他在照片中所呈現齣來的容貌反差太大。父親是牧師,和尼采一樣,他是一個反基督者,質疑“上帝就是愛”是“泛靈論”,曾經認為信教是“精神上的手淫”(嗬嗬),因為寢室裏有避孕套而...
圖書標籤: 燕蔔蓀 近代史 詩poem 西方文學理論 傳記 英國 燕蔔蓀William_Empson 民國
"And I a twister love what I abhor"
評分"And I a twister love what I abhor"
評分光中國部分就值得引進瞭
評分"And I a twister love what I abhor"
評分光中國部分就值得引進瞭
William Empson 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載