Moses and Monotheism

弗洛伊德·西格蒙德（Freud Sigmund， 1856-1939）：奥地利精神科、神经科医生、心理学家，精神分析学派的创始人。1856年5月6日出生于摩拉维亚一犹太商人之家，是其父母八个子女中的长子。他4岁时随家人迁居维也纳。17岁考入维也纳大学医学院，1881年获医学博士学位。后开业行医，担任临床神经专科医生，终生从事精神病的临床治疗工作。在探寻精神病病源方面，弗洛伊德抛弃了当时占主流的生理病因说，逐步走向了心理病因说，创立了心理分析学说（Psychoanalysis，又译精神分析），认为精神病起源于心理内部动机的冲突。他思考敏锐、分析精细、推断循回递进、构思步步趋入，探讨问题中，往往引述文学、历史、医学、哲学、宗教等材料，揭示出人们心灵的底层。主要著作有：《梦的解释》（1900年）、《性学三论》（1905年）、《心理分析导论》（1910年）、《文明及其缺陷》（1929年）。1886年与马莎·伯莱斯结婚，育有三男三女，女儿Ａ·弗洛伊德后来也成为著名的心理学家。

出版者:Vintage

作者:Sigmund Freud

页数:192

出版时间:1955-01-12

价格:USD 9.95

装帧:Paperback

isbn号码:9780394700144

图书标签:FreudPsychoanalysis心理学弗洛伊德哲学psychoanalysis精神分析Psychology

Freud's speculations on various aspects of religion where he explains various characteristics of the Jews in their relations with the Christians.

读后感

俺在书架上找书看时，发现了这本老书：摩西与一神教。黄色的封皮，大32开的开本，三联出版，弗洛伊德晚期作品。俺上大学时有一段时期迷恋弗洛伊德老先生，几乎把能找到的他的书都看了，甚至他的传记也看了好几个版本。最后去了趟三联书店，买了这本老弗83岁才出版的《摩西与...  

“所谓英雄，乃是大丈夫似的挺身而起反抗他的父亲并取得胜利的人。”这里体现了弗洛伊德一直以来的恋母仇父的思想。 弗洛伊德把被放在箱子中遗弃在水中的婴儿形容成一个全新的诞生的过程：“遗弃在箱子里的婴儿明显的是生育的象征，箱子代表子宫，河水则代表羊水。”婴儿在被...

这个弗洛伊德就是那个《梦的解析》的弗洛伊德，这本小书就是可能因为杀伤力太大了，反倒悄悄咪咪的做了伪装，看似泯然众人。 摩西是个革命家，称得上革命家的，弗洛伊德定了标准:一是建立宗教；二是立法（律法）。弗洛伊德考证，摩西极大可能是个古埃及的革命领袖，带着一干人...  

用户评价

This is precisely what Freud had in mind: an explicit analogy between individual and collective experience, and an implicit, valuefree analogy between aggression and victimhood. Consequently, in order to use trauma as a prop, he was to define it in such a way that would enable him to apply it to all these different aspects of traumatic experiences.

学术性和政治性得以两全需要的恐怕是一个流亡他国的理论家。考据部分很依赖其他学者的研究，但弗洛伊德自己的分析还挺有说服力的。如果要写副标题，大概可以写Father and Greatness吧。

This is precisely what Freud had in mind: an explicit analogy between individual and collective experience, and an implicit, valuefree analogy between aggression and victimhood. Consequently, in order to use trauma as a prop, he was to define it in such a way that would enable him to apply it to all these different aspects of traumatic experiences.

This is precisely what Freud had in mind: an explicit analogy between individual and collective experience, and an implicit, valuefree analogy between aggression and victimhood. Consequently, in order to use trauma as a prop, he was to define it in such a way that would enable him to apply it to all these different aspects of traumatic experiences.

This is precisely what Freud had in mind: an explicit analogy between individual and collective experience, and an implicit, valuefree analogy between aggression and victimhood. Consequently, in order to use trauma as a prop, he was to define it in such a way that would enable him to apply it to all these different aspects of traumatic experiences.